PATK
Patrick Industries, Inc.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$3.17B
5Y Perf.+175.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PATK vs THO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
THO
Thor Industries, Inc.
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Market Cap$4.06B
5Y Perf.-10.8%
PATK vs THO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PATK | THO |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Auto - Recreational Vehicles |
| Market Cap | $3.17B | $4.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.94B | $9.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $136M | $300M |
| Gross Margin | 22.5% | 14.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.0% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | 18.2x | 18.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.64B | $923M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26M | $587M |
PATK vs THO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PATK
THO
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Industries,… (PATK) | 100 | 275.8 | +175.8% |
| Thor Industries, In… (THO) | 100 | 89.2 | -10.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PATK vs THO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PATK leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Thor Industries, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PATK
Patrick Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play
PATK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.3%, EPS growth -5.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
- 395.2% 10Y total return vs THO's 43.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, current ratio 2.51x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
THO
Thor Industries, Inc.
The Income Pick
THO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.23, yield 2.6%
- 2.6% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs PATK's 1.7%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PATK | 6.3% revenue growth vs THO's -4.6% |
| Value | PATK | Lower P/E (18.2x vs 18.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | PATK | 3.5% margin vs THO's 3.0% |
| Stability / Safety | PATK | Beta 0.93 vs THO's 1.23 |
| Dividends | THO | 2.6% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs PATK's 1.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | PATK | +19.6% vs THO's +7.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PATK | 4.4% ROA vs THO's 4.3%, ROIC 7.6% vs 6.7% |
PATK vs THO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2020
PATK vs THO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPATKLAGGINGTHO
THOThor Industries, Inc.
2leads
PATKPatrick Industries, I…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs THOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
PATK4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
THO5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
PATK6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
PATK2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
THO2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PATK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
THO is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.9B annually — 2.5x PATK's $3.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.5% (PATK) to 3.0% (THO). On growth, THO holds the edge at +5.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PATKPatrick Industrie… | THOThor Industries, … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.9B | $9.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $445M | $714M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $136M | $300M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $194M | $228M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +14.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.6% | +5.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.9% | +35.0% |
PATK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
THO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.9x trailing earnings, THO trades at a 35% valuation discount to PATK's 24.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, THO's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PATK's 10.7x.
| Metric | PATKPatrick Industrie… | THOThor Industries, … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.8B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.45x | 15.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.24x | 18.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.72x | 6.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.80x | 0.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.79x | 0.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.86x | 8.93x |
THO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PATK and THO each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PATK delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for THO. THO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PATK's 1.39x.
| Metric | PATKPatrick Industrie… | THOThor Industries, … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.6% | +7.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.4% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.2% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.39x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $336M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26M | $587M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $923M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.40x | 9.82x |
Evenly matched — PATK and THO each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PATK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PATK five years ago would be worth $15,662 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,916 for THO. Over the past 12 months, PATK leads with a +19.6% total return vs THO's +7.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PATK at 31.7% vs THO's 0.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PATKPatrick Industrie… | THOThor Industries, … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.2% | -26.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.6% | +7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.2% | +0.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.6% | -40.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +395.2% | +43.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.7% | +0.1% |
PATK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PATK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PATK is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than THO's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | PATKPatrick Industrie… | THOThor Industries, … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $148.50 | $122.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.35 | $73.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.2% | +62.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.8 | 44.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 469K | 768K |
PATK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
THO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PATK as "Buy" and THO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 48.6% upside for THO (target: $114) vs 32.7% for PATK (target: $127). For income investors, THO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.58% vs PATK's 1.67%.
| Metric | PATKPatrick Industrie… | THOThor Industries, … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $126.50 | $114.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.60 | $1.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +1.3% |
THO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
PATK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). THO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Best OverallPatrick Industries, Inc. (PATK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PATK vs THO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PATK or THO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Patrick Industries, Inc.
(PATK) is the stronger pick with 6. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 6% for Thor Industries, Inc. (THO). Thor Industries, Inc. (THO) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (18. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PATK or THO?
On trailing P/E, Thor Industries, Inc.
(THO) is the cheapest at 15. 9x versus Patrick Industries, Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, Patrick Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PATK or THO?
Over the past 5 years, Patrick Industries, Inc.
(PATK) delivered a total return of +56. 6%, compared to -40. 8% for Thor Industries, Inc. (THO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PATK returned +395. 2% versus THO's +43. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PATK or THO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Patrick Industries, Inc.
(PATK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus Thor Industries, Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning THO is approximately 32% more volatile than PATK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Thor Industries, Inc. (THO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 139% for Patrick Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PATK or THO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Patrick Industries, Inc.
(PATK) is pulling ahead at 6. 3% versus -4. 6% for Thor Industries, Inc. (THO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Thor Industries, Inc. grew EPS -2. 0% year-over-year, compared to -5. 1% for Patrick Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PATK leads at -6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PATK or THO?
Patrick Industries, Inc.
(PATK) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 4% net margin versus 2. 7% for Thor Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PATK leads at 7. 0% versus 4. 4% for THO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PATK leads at 23. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PATK or THO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Patrick Industries, Inc.
(PATK) trades at 18. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 5x for Thor Industries, Inc. — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for THO: 48. 6% to $114. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — PATK or THO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Thor Industries, Inc. (THO) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 7% for Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK).
09Is PATK or THO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Patrick Industries, Inc.
(PATK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 1. 7% yield, +395. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PATK: +395. 2%, THO: +43. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PATK and THO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PATK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; THO is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PATK: -0.6% · THO: 5.3%)Net Margin>
%
(PATK: 3.5% · THO: 3.0%)P/E Ratio<
x
(PATK: 24.5x · THO: 15.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.