PAVS
Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd.
Packaged Foods
Market Cap$70K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PAVS vs TAOP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TAOP
Taoping Inc.
Software - Infrastructure
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-99.8%
PAVS vs TAOP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PAVS | TAOP |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $70K | $1M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $36M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27M | $-7M |
| Gross Margin | 11.1% | 14.9% |
| Operating Margin | -10.3% | -15.7% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $261K | $2M |
PAVS vs TAOP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PAVS
TAOP
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paranovus Entertain… (PAVS) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Taoping Inc. (TAOP) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAVS vs TAOP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TAOP leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PAVS
Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd.
The Income Pick
PAVS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.51
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 8.1%, current ratio 1.12x
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 1.12x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
TAOP
Taoping Inc.
The Growth Play
TAOP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -16.0%, EPS growth -18.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.3%
- -99.9% 10Y total return vs PAVS's -100.0%
- -16.0% revenue growth vs PAVS's -98.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TAOP | -16.0% revenue growth vs PAVS's -98.9% |
| Quality / Margins | TAOP | -19.6% margin vs PAVS's -211.2% |
| Stability / Safety | PAVS | Beta 1.51 vs TAOP's 2.30, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TAOP | -78.3% vs PAVS's -99.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TAOP | -21.7% ROA vs PAVS's -94.4%, ROIC -27.1% vs -27.1% |
PAVS vs TAOP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
PAVS vs TAOP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTAOPLAGGINGPAVS
PAVSParanovus Entertainme…
1leads
TAOPTaoping Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PAVSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TAOP2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PAVS6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TAOP6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TAOP1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PAVS and TAOP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TAOP is the larger business by revenue, generating $36M annually — 2.8x PAVS's $13M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -19.6% (TAOP) to -2.1% (PAVS). On growth, PAVS holds the edge at +180.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | TAOPTaoping Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $36M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $531,773 | -$4M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$27M | -$7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +14.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.3% | -15.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -19.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.5% | -8.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +180.3% | -2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.9% | -51.7% |
Evenly matched — PAVS and TAOP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TAOP leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | TAOPTaoping Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $70,061 | $1M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $9M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -0.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.00x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.98x | 0.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
TAOP leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAVS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TAOP delivers a -46.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-47 in annual profit, vs $-116 for PAVS. PAVS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TAOP's 0.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PAVS scores 5/9 vs TAOP's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | TAOPTaoping Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -116.2% | -46.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -94.4% | -21.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.1% | -27.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -39.5% | -38.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $261,355 | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.83x | -52.63x |
PAVS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TAOP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TAOP five years ago would be worth $7 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for PAVS. Over the past 12 months, TAOP leads with a -78.3% total return vs PAVS's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TAOP at -80.9% vs PAVS's -93.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | TAOPTaoping Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -94.8% | -6.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | -78.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -93.2% | -80.9% |
TAOP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PAVS and TAOP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAVS is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TAOP's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TAOP currently trades 6.4% from its 52-week high vs PAVS's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | TAOPTaoping Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 2.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1488.00 | $20.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.02 | $1.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.1% | +6.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.9 | 53.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 20K |
Evenly matched — PAVS and TAOP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TAOP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | PAVSParanovus Enterta… | TAOPTaoping Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TAOP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
TAOP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). PAVS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Best OverallTaoping Inc. (TAOP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PAVS vs TAOP: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAVS or TAOP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Taoping Inc.
(TAOP) is the stronger pick with -16. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 9% for Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PAVS or TAOP?
Over the past 5 years, Taoping Inc.
(TAOP) delivered a total return of -99. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TAOP returned -99. 9% versus PAVS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PAVS or TAOP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd.
(PAVS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Taoping Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning TAOP is approximately 52% more volatile than PAVS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 50% for Taoping Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PAVS or TAOP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Taoping Inc.
(TAOP) is pulling ahead at -16. 0% versus -98. 9% for Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. (PAVS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. grew EPS 96. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1870. 0% for Taoping Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TAOP leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PAVS or TAOP?
Taoping Inc.
(TAOP) is the more profitable company, earning -32. 7% net margin versus -110. 3% for Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd. — meaning it keeps -32. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TAOP leads at -29. 0% versus -94. 8% for PAVS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAVS leads at 12. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PAVS or TAOP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is PAVS or TAOP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Paranovus Entertainment Technology Ltd.
(PAVS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Taoping Inc. (TAOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAVS: -100. 0%, TAOP: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PAVS and TAOP?
These companies operate in different sectors (PAVS (Consumer Defensive) and TAOP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PAVS: 18033.4% · TAOP: -2.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.