Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PBA vs TRP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
PBA vs TRP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $26.06B | $68.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.81B | $15.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.69B | $3.52B |
| Gross Margin | 39.5% | 49.8% |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 44.0% |
| Forward P/E | 15.1x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $13.31B | $60.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $106M | $261M |
PBA vs TRP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pembina Pipeline Co… (PBA) | 100 | 179.1 | +79.1% |
| TC Energy Corporati… (TRP) | 100 | 159.7 | +59.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PBA vs TRP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PBA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.00, yield 5.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.00, Low D/E 79.4%, current ratio 0.61x
- Beta 0.00, yield 5.0%, current ratio 0.61x
TRP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth -26.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.3%
- 148.2% 10Y total return vs PBA's 125.0%
- 10.3% revenue growth vs PBA's 5.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.3% revenue growth vs PBA's 5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.1x vs 17.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.2% margin vs PBA's 21.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.00 vs TRP's 0.01, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs TRP's 3.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.5% vs PBA's +20.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs TRP's 3.0%, ROIC 6.9% vs 5.2% |
PBA vs TRP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PBA vs TRP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRP is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.1B annually — 1.9x PBA's $7.8B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 23.2% (TRP) to 21.7% (PBA). On growth, TRP holds the edge at +199.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.8B | $15.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.8B | $9.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | $3.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.3B | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.5% | +49.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.0% | +44.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +23.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.8% | +199.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.2% | +1.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PBA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.9x trailing earnings, PBA trades at a 16% valuation discount to TRP's 27.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PBA's 12.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRP's 16.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26.1B | $68.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $35.8B | $112.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.90x | 27.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.05x | 17.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.80x | 16.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.55x | 6.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.11x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.22x | 44.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PBA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PBA delivers a 9.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $9 for TRP. PBA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.79x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRP's 1.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRP scores 6/9 vs PBA's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.9% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.9% | +5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.79x | 1.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13.2B | $60.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $106M | $261M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.3B | $60.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.76x | 2.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRP five years ago would be worth $17,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,008 for PBA. Over the past 12 months, TRP leads with a +34.5% total return vs PBA's +20.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRP at 24.3% vs PBA's 16.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.6% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.3% | +34.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.9% | +92.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.1% | +70.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.0% | +148.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.2% | +24.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PBA and TRP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PBA is the less volatile stock with a 0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRP's 0.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.00x | 0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.73 | $67.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.45 | $46.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.9% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.9 | 66.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
PBA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PBA as "Buy" and TRP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -5.3% upside for TRP (target: $62) vs -13.5% for PBA (target: $39). For income investors, PBA offers the higher dividend yield at 5.00% vs TRP's 3.79%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.76 | $62.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.0% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.04 | $3.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
PBA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TRP leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
PBA vs TRP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PBA or TRP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TC Energy Corporation (TRP) is the stronger pick with 10.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA). Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) offers the better valuation at 22. 9x trailing P/E (15. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PBA or TRP?
On trailing P/E, Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) is the cheapest at 22.
9x versus TC Energy Corporation at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Pembina Pipeline Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PBA or TRP?
Over the past 5 years, TC Energy Corporation (TRP) delivered a total return of +70.
5%, compared to +70. 1% for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRP returned +148. 2% versus PBA's +125. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PBA or TRP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
00β versus TC Energy Corporation's 0. 01β — meaning TRP is approximately 109% more volatile than PBA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 79% versus 165% for TC Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PBA or TRP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TC Energy Corporation (TRP) is pulling ahead at 10.
3% versus 5. 3% for Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pembina Pipeline Corporation grew EPS -11. 3% year-over-year, compared to -26. 2% for TC Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRP leads at 7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PBA or TRP?
TC Energy Corporation (TRP) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
2% net margin versus 21. 8% for Pembina Pipeline Corporation — meaning it keeps 23. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRP leads at 44. 2% versus 36. 1% for PBA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRP leads at 50. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PBA or TRP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) trades at 15.
1x forward P/E versus 17. 5x for TC Energy Corporation — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRP: -5. 3% to $62. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PBA or TRP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) offers the highest yield at 5. 0%, versus 3. 8% for TC Energy Corporation (TRP).
09Is PBA or TRP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TC Energy Corporation (TRP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
01), 3. 8% yield, +148. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRP: +148. 2%, PBA: +125. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PBA and TRP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.