Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PCLA vs GILT vs SHEN vs VSAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Telecommunications Services
Communication Equipment
PCLA vs GILT vs SHEN vs VSAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Communication Equipment | Telecommunications Services | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $44M | $1.38B | $898M | $8.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $759M | $452M | $266M | $4.62B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-478M | $21M | $-36M | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 29.5% | 37.9% | 48.8% |
| Operating Margin | -55.5% | 3.6% | -10.3% | -1.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 37.7x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $557M | $11M | $642M | $7.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $457M | $169M | $27M | $1.61B |
PCLA vs GILT vs SHEN vs VSAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| Gilat Satellite Net… (GILT) | 100 | 263.5 | +163.5% |
| Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN) | 100 | 150.3 | +50.3% |
| Viasat, Inc. (VSAT) | 100 | 689.5 | +589.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PCLA vs GILT vs SHEN vs VSAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PCLA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.69, current ratio 2.18x
- Beta 1.69, current ratio 2.18x
GILT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 47.9%, EPS growth -22.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
- 358.8% 10Y total return vs SHEN's 21.6%
- 47.9% revenue growth vs VSAT's 5.5%
- 4.6% margin vs PCLA's -63.1%
SHEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.7%
- Beta 0.89 vs VSAT's 2.92, lower leverage
- 0.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
VSAT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +6.1% vs PCLA's -87.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 47.9% revenue growth vs VSAT's 5.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.6% margin vs PCLA's -63.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs VSAT's 2.92, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.1% vs PCLA's -87.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs PCLA's -52.0%, ROIC 5.7% vs -68.8% |
PCLA vs GILT vs SHEN vs VSAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PCLA vs GILT vs SHEN vs VSAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GILT leads in 3 of 6 categories
SHEN leads 1 • PCLA leads 0 • VSAT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GILT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VSAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.6B annually — 17.3x SHEN's $266M. GILT is the more profitable business, keeping 4.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PCLA's -63.1%. On growth, GILT holds the edge at +75.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $759M | $452M | $266M | $4.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$398M | $40M | $104M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$478M | $21M | -$36M | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$348M | $10M | -$276M | $907M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +29.5% | +37.9% | +48.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -55.5% | +3.6% | -10.3% | -1.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -63.1% | +4.6% | -13.7% | -4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -45.9% | +2.2% | -103.5% | +19.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.3% | +75.3% | -100.0% | +3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.1% | -38.1% | -18.2% | +173.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SHEN and VSAT each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, VSAT's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GILT's 27.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $44M | $1.4B | $898M | $8.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $45M | $1.2B | $1.5B | $14.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.48x | 55.41x | -22.86x | -14.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 37.68x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.81x | 13.80x | 11.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.86x | 3.05x | 2.51x | 1.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 19.58x | 2.27x | 0.92x | 1.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 150.06x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GILT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GILT delivers a 4.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-106 for PCLA. GILT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VSAT's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCLA scores 5/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -106.3% | +4.1% | -3.7% | -4.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -52.0% | +2.8% | -2.0% | -3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -68.8% | +5.7% | -1.1% | -0.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -56.5% | +4.7% | -1.3% | -0.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.57x | 0.02x | 0.66x | 1.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $100M | -$158M | $614M | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $457M | $169M | $27M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $557M | $11M | $642M | $7.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.41x | 5.18x | -0.65x | 6.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GILT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GILT five years ago would be worth $19,503 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $211 for PCLA. Over the past 12 months, VSAT leads with a +614.8% total return vs PCLA's -87.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GILT at 51.4% vs PCLA's -72.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -80.6% | +40.5% | +43.5% | +76.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.1% | +186.3% | +41.3% | +614.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | +247.0% | -13.6% | +80.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | +95.0% | -27.9% | +33.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | +358.8% | +21.6% | -12.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -72.4% | +51.4% | -4.8% | +21.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SHEN and VSAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VSAT's 2.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VSAT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs PCLA's 1.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 2.09x | 0.89x | 2.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $112.20 | $20.56 | $17.34 | $68.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.17 | $5.43 | $9.66 | $8.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.6% | +91.6% | +93.6% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.7 | 63.1 | 55.2 | 67.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 650K | 300K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
SHEN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GILT as "Buy", SHEN as "Buy", VSAT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs -62.8% for GILT (target: $7). SHEN is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 | $29.00 | $57.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 8 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.12 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
GILT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SHEN leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
PCLA vs GILT vs SHEN vs VSAT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PCLA or GILT or SHEN or VSAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is the stronger pick with 47. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 5% for Viasat, Inc. (VSAT). Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT) offers the better valuation at 55. 4x trailing P/E (37. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PCLA or GILT or SHEN or VSAT?
Over the past 5 years, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) delivered a total return of +95. 0%, compared to -97. 9% for PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GILT returned +358. 8% versus PCLA's -97. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PCLA or GILT or SHEN or VSAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus Viasat, Inc. 's 2. 92β — meaning VSAT is approximately 230% more volatile than SHEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 162% for Viasat, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PCLA or GILT or SHEN or VSAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is pulling ahead at 47. 9% versus 5. 5% for Viasat, Inc. (VSAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viasat, Inc. grew EPS 50. 9% year-over-year, compared to -120. 1% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, GILT leads at 23. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PCLA or GILT or SHEN or VSAT?
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -61. 2% for PicoCELA Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GILT leads at 4. 5% versus -57. 0% for PCLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PCLA leads at 54. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PCLA or GILT or SHEN or VSAT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 78.
7% to $29. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — PCLA or GILT or SHEN or VSAT?
In this comparison, SHEN (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. PCLA, GILT, VSAT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is PCLA or GILT or SHEN or VSAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 7% yield). Viasat, Inc. (VSAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHEN: +21. 6%, VSAT: -12. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PCLA and GILT and SHEN and VSAT?
These companies operate in different sectors (PCLA (Communication Services) and GILT (Technology) and SHEN (Communication Services) and VSAT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PCLA is a small-cap high-growth stock; GILT is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VSAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SHEN pays a dividend while PCLA, GILT, VSAT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.