Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PDFS vs PRGS vs ONTO vs GWRE vs COHU

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PDFS
PDF Solutions, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.06B
5Y Perf.+202.6%
PRGS
Progress Software Corporation

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.26B
5Y Perf.-26.1%
ONTO
Onto Innovation Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$14.16B
5Y Perf.+815.9%
GWRE
Guidewire Software, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$11.70B
5Y Perf.+35.0%
COHU
Cohu, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.33B
5Y Perf.+229.0%

PDFS vs PRGS vs ONTO vs GWRE vs COHU — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PDFS logoPDFS
PRGS logoPRGS
ONTO logoONTO
GWRE logoGWRE
COHU logoCOHU
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSemiconductorsSoftware - ApplicationSemiconductors
Market Cap$2.06B$1.26B$14.16B$11.70B$2.33B
Revenue (TTM)$231M$978M$1.03B$1.34B$481M
Net Income (TTM)$7M$73M$106M$189M$-56M
Gross Margin72.5%80.8%48.8%63.8%25.7%
Operating Margin6.8%15.7%10.0%6.8%-10.6%
Forward P/E44.4x5.0x39.9x39.4x85.0x
Total Debt$77M$851M$17M$716M$359M
Cash & Equiv.$42M$95M$346M$699M$227M

PDFS vs PRGS vs ONTO vs GWRE vs COHULong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PDFS
PRGS
ONTO
GWRE
COHU
StockMay 20May 26Return
PDF Solutions, Inc. (PDFS)100302.6+202.6%
Progress Software C… (PRGS)10073.9-26.1%
Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO)100915.9+815.9%
Guidewire Software,… (GWRE)100135.0+35.0%
Cohu, Inc. (COHU)100329.0+229.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PDFS vs PRGS vs ONTO vs GWRE vs COHU

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PRGS and GWRE are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Guidewire Software, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. COHU also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PDFS
PDF Solutions, Inc.
The Growth Angle

PDFS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
PRGS
Progress Software Corporation
The Income Pick

PRGS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 0.1%
  • Rev growth 29.8%, EPS growth 7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.5%
  • 29.8% revenue growth vs ONTO's 1.8%
  • Lower P/E (5.0x vs 85.0x)
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
ONTO
Onto Innovation Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ONTO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 14.9% 10Y total return vs PDFS's 299.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
GWRE
Guidewire Software, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

GWRE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 49.1%, current ratio 2.77x
  • Beta 0.50, current ratio 2.77x
  • 14.1% margin vs COHU's -11.5%
  • Beta 0.50 vs ONTO's 2.60
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
COHU
Cohu, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

COHU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +206.4% vs PRGS's -51.6%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPRGS logoPRGS29.8% revenue growth vs ONTO's 1.8%
ValuePRGS logoPRGSLower P/E (5.0x vs 85.0x)
Quality / MarginsGWRE logoGWRE14.1% margin vs COHU's -11.5%
Stability / SafetyGWRE logoGWREBeta 0.50 vs ONTO's 2.60
DividendsPRGS logoPRGS0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)COHU logoCOHU+206.4% vs PRGS's -51.6%
Efficiency (ROA)GWRE logoGWRE7.2% ROA vs COHU's -4.9%, ROIC 2.3% vs -5.7%

PDFS vs PRGS vs ONTO vs GWRE vs COHU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PDFSPDF Solutions, Inc.
FY 2025
Platform
100.0%$181M
PRGSProgress Software Corporation
FY 2025
Maintenance and Services
75.7%$740M
Software Licenses
24.3%$238M
ONTOOnto Innovation Inc.
FY 2025
Systems And Software Revenue
84.3%$848M
Parts Revenue
8.4%$84M
Service Revenue
7.3%$73M
GWREGuidewire Software, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription
55.5%$667M
Term License
20.9%$252M
Service
18.2%$219M
Support
5.3%$64M
Perpetual License
0.0%$118,000
COHUCohu, Inc.
FY 2014
Semiconductor Equipment
95.0%$317M
Microwave Communications Equipment
5.0%$17M

PDFS vs PRGS vs ONTO vs GWRE vs COHU — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPRGSLAGGINGCOHU

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PRGS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

GWRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 5.8x PDFS's $231M. GWRE is the more profitable business, keeping 14.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COHU's -11.5%. On growth, COHU holds the edge at +29.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPDFS logoPDFSPDF Solutions, In…PRGS logoPRGSProgress Software…ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…GWRE logoGWREGuidewire Softwar…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$231M$978M$1.0B$1.3B$481M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$23M$160M$158M$103M-$11M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$7M$73M$106M$189M-$56M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$18M$229M$239M$310M$32M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+72.5%+80.8%+48.8%+63.8%+25.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.8%+15.7%+10.0%+6.8%-10.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.1%+7.5%+10.3%+14.1%-11.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-7.8%+23.5%+23.2%+23.1%+6.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+25.9%+17.5%+9.5%+24.0%+29.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.5%+22.2%-48.5%+2.6%+60.6%
PRGS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PRGS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 18.0x trailing earnings, PRGS trades at a 89% valuation discount to GWRE's 170.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRGS's 12.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GWRE's 180.8x.

MetricPDFS logoPDFSPDF Solutions, In…PRGS logoPRGSProgress Software…ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…GWRE logoGWREGuidewire Softwar…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$2.1B$1.3B$14.2B$11.7B$2.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.1B$2.0B$13.8B$11.7B$2.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3167.48x17.99x102.40x170.93x-31.16x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.44.41x4.99x39.93x39.38x84.99x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.96x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple121.84x12.67x71.53x180.79x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue9.40x1.29x14.09x9.73x5.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.49x2.75x6.68x8.16x2.95x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.51x47.23x39.66x216.85x
PRGS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — PRGS and ONTO and GWRE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

PRGS delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-7 for COHU. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGS's 1.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GWRE scores 7/9 vs PDFS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPDFS logoPDFSPDF Solutions, In…PRGS logoPRGSProgress Software…ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…GWRE logoGWREGuidewire Softwar…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.7%+15.3%+5.2%+12.9%-6.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.7%+3.0%+4.7%+7.2%-4.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.9%+7.4%+5.7%+2.3%-5.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.9%+8.2%+6.5%+2.3%-5.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936474
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.28x1.78x0.01x0.49x0.46x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$34M$756M-$329M$17M$132M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$42M$95M$346M$699M$227M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$77M$851M$17M$716M$359M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.85x2.16x388.85x-168.82x
Evenly matched — PRGS and ONTO and GWRE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ONTO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ONTO five years ago would be worth $46,041 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,428 for PRGS. Over the past 12 months, COHU leads with a +206.4% total return vs PRGS's -51.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ONTO at 48.9% vs PRGS's -16.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPDFS logoPDFSPDF Solutions, In…PRGS logoPRGSProgress Software…ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…GWRE logoGWREGuidewire Softwar…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+74.7%-27.3%+71.6%-26.2%+101.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+163.4%-51.6%+124.5%-35.1%+206.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+33.1%-42.6%+230.4%+78.2%+46.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+184.5%-25.7%+360.4%+41.7%+35.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+299.9%+41.0%+1491.2%+149.8%+348.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+10.0%-16.9%+48.9%+21.2%+13.6%
ONTO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PDFS and GWRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GWRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ONTO's 2.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PDFS currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs PRGS's 45.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPDFS logoPDFSPDF Solutions, In…PRGS logoPRGSProgress Software…ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…GWRE logoGWREGuidewire Softwar…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.25x0.96x2.60x0.50x2.12x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$52.28$65.50$315.86$272.60$50.68
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.35$23.82$85.88$115.57$15.97
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.8%+45.6%+90.1%+50.8%+97.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10068.550.451.249.766.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded415K985K827K1.3M959K
Evenly matched — PDFS and GWRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PDFS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: PDFS as "Buy", PRGS as "Buy", ONTO as "Buy", GWRE as "Buy", COHU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 77.1% upside for GWRE (target: $245) vs -7.0% for PDFS (target: $48).

MetricPDFS logoPDFSPDF Solutions, In…PRGS logoPRGSProgress Software…ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…GWRE logoGWREGuidewire Softwar…COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$48.00$45.00$331.67$245.17$49.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts513112614
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises100
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%+8.3%+0.5%0.0%+0.3%
PDFS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

PRGS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ONTO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallProgress Software Corporati… (PRGS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PDFS vs PRGS vs ONTO vs GWRE vs COHU: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) is the stronger pick with 29.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 8% for Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO). Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) offers the better valuation at 18. 0x trailing P/E (5. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PDF Solutions, Inc. (PDFS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU?

On trailing P/E, Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) is the cheapest at 18.

0x versus Guidewire Software, Inc. at 170. 9x. On forward P/E, Progress Software Corporation is actually cheaper at 5. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU?

Over the past 5 years, Onto Innovation Inc.

(ONTO) delivered a total return of +360. 4%, compared to -25. 7% for Progress Software Corporation (PRGS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ONTO returned +1491% versus PRGS's +41. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guidewire Software, Inc.

(GWRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Onto Innovation Inc. 's 2. 60β — meaning ONTO is approximately 417% more volatile than GWRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 178% for Progress Software Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) is pulling ahead at 29.

8% versus 1. 8% for Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guidewire Software, Inc. grew EPS 1192% year-over-year, compared to -116. 3% for PDF Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRGS leads at 17. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU?

Onto Innovation Inc.

(ONTO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRGS leads at 15. 7% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRGS leads at 80. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) trades at 5.

0x forward P/E versus 85. 0x for Cohu, Inc. — 80. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GWRE: 77. 1% to $245. 17.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Guidewire Software, Inc.

(GWRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), +149. 8% 10Y return). PDF Solutions, Inc. (PDFS) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GWRE: +149. 8%, PDFS: +299. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PDFS and PRGS and ONTO and GWRE and COHU?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PDFS is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRGS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ONTO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GWRE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PDFS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Gross Margin > 43%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRGS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ONTO

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GWRE

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

COHU

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PDFS and PRGS and ONTO and GWRE and COHU on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PDFS: 25.9% · PRGS: 17.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(PDFS: 3.1% · PRGS: 7.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.