Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PDFS vs PRGS vs ONTO vs GWRE vs COHU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Semiconductors
Software - Application
Semiconductors
PDFS vs PRGS vs ONTO vs GWRE vs COHU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Semiconductors | Software - Application | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.06B | $1.26B | $14.16B | $11.70B | $2.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $231M | $978M | $1.03B | $1.34B | $481M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $73M | $106M | $189M | $-56M |
| Gross Margin | 72.5% | 80.8% | 48.8% | 63.8% | 25.7% |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | 15.7% | 10.0% | 6.8% | -10.6% |
| Forward P/E | 44.4x | 5.0x | 39.9x | 39.4x | 85.0x |
| Total Debt | $77M | $851M | $17M | $716M | $359M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $95M | $346M | $699M | $227M |
PDFS vs PRGS vs ONTO vs GWRE vs COHU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDF Solutions, Inc. (PDFS) | 100 | 302.6 | +202.6% |
| Progress Software C… (PRGS) | 100 | 73.9 | -26.1% |
| Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) | 100 | 915.9 | +815.9% |
| Guidewire Software,… (GWRE) | 100 | 135.0 | +35.0% |
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 329.0 | +229.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PDFS vs PRGS vs ONTO vs GWRE vs COHU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PDFS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PRGS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 0.1%
- Rev growth 29.8%, EPS growth 7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.5%
- 29.8% revenue growth vs ONTO's 1.8%
- Lower P/E (5.0x vs 85.0x)
ONTO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 14.9% 10Y total return vs PDFS's 299.9%
GWRE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 49.1%, current ratio 2.77x
- Beta 0.50, current ratio 2.77x
- 14.1% margin vs COHU's -11.5%
- Beta 0.50 vs ONTO's 2.60
COHU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +206.4% vs PRGS's -51.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.8% revenue growth vs ONTO's 1.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.0x vs 85.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.1% margin vs COHU's -11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs ONTO's 2.60 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +206.4% vs PRGS's -51.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.2% ROA vs COHU's -4.9%, ROIC 2.3% vs -5.7% |
PDFS vs PRGS vs ONTO vs GWRE vs COHU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PDFS vs PRGS vs ONTO vs GWRE vs COHU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRGS leads in 2 of 6 categories
ONTO leads 1 • PDFS leads 1 • GWRE leads 0 • COHU leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GWRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 5.8x PDFS's $231M. GWRE is the more profitable business, keeping 14.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COHU's -11.5%. On growth, COHU holds the edge at +29.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $231M | $978M | $1.0B | $1.3B | $481M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $23M | $160M | $158M | $103M | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $73M | $106M | $189M | -$56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | $229M | $239M | $310M | $32M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.5% | +80.8% | +48.8% | +63.8% | +25.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +15.7% | +10.0% | +6.8% | -10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +7.5% | +10.3% | +14.1% | -11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | +23.5% | +23.2% | +23.1% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.9% | +17.5% | +9.5% | +24.0% | +29.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +22.2% | -48.5% | +2.6% | +60.6% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.0x trailing earnings, PRGS trades at a 89% valuation discount to GWRE's 170.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRGS's 12.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GWRE's 180.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $1.3B | $14.2B | $11.7B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $2.0B | $13.8B | $11.7B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3167.48x | 17.99x | 102.40x | 170.93x | -31.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 44.41x | 4.99x | 39.93x | 39.38x | 84.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.96x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 121.84x | 12.67x | 71.53x | 180.79x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.40x | 1.29x | 14.09x | 9.73x | 5.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.49x | 2.75x | 6.68x | 8.16x | 2.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.51x | 47.23x | 39.66x | 216.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PRGS and ONTO and GWRE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRGS delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-7 for COHU. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGS's 1.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GWRE scores 7/9 vs PDFS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.7% | +15.3% | +5.2% | +12.9% | -6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +3.0% | +4.7% | +7.2% | -4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +7.4% | +5.7% | +2.3% | -5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.9% | +8.2% | +6.5% | +2.3% | -5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 1.78x | 0.01x | 0.49x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $34M | $756M | -$329M | $17M | $132M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $95M | $346M | $699M | $227M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $77M | $851M | $17M | $716M | $359M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.85x | 2.16x | — | 388.85x | -168.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ONTO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ONTO five years ago would be worth $46,041 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,428 for PRGS. Over the past 12 months, COHU leads with a +206.4% total return vs PRGS's -51.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ONTO at 48.9% vs PRGS's -16.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +74.7% | -27.3% | +71.6% | -26.2% | +101.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +163.4% | -51.6% | +124.5% | -35.1% | +206.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.1% | -42.6% | +230.4% | +78.2% | +46.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +184.5% | -25.7% | +360.4% | +41.7% | +35.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +299.9% | +41.0% | +1491.2% | +149.8% | +348.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.0% | -16.9% | +48.9% | +21.2% | +13.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PDFS and GWRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GWRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ONTO's 2.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PDFS currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs PRGS's 45.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.25x | 0.96x | 2.60x | 0.50x | 2.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $52.28 | $65.50 | $315.86 | $272.60 | $50.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.35 | $23.82 | $85.88 | $115.57 | $15.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.8% | +45.6% | +90.1% | +50.8% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.5 | 50.4 | 51.2 | 49.7 | 66.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 415K | 985K | 827K | 1.3M | 959K |
Analyst Outlook
PDFS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PDFS as "Buy", PRGS as "Buy", ONTO as "Buy", GWRE as "Buy", COHU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 77.1% upside for GWRE (target: $245) vs -7.0% for PDFS (target: $48).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.00 | $45.00 | $331.67 | $245.17 | $49.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 13 | 11 | 26 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.02 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +8.3% | +0.5% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
PRGS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ONTO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
PDFS vs PRGS vs ONTO vs GWRE vs COHU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) is the stronger pick with 29.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 8% for Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO). Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) offers the better valuation at 18. 0x trailing P/E (5. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PDF Solutions, Inc. (PDFS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU?
On trailing P/E, Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) is the cheapest at 18.
0x versus Guidewire Software, Inc. at 170. 9x. On forward P/E, Progress Software Corporation is actually cheaper at 5. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU?
Over the past 5 years, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) delivered a total return of +360. 4%, compared to -25. 7% for Progress Software Corporation (PRGS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ONTO returned +1491% versus PRGS's +41. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Onto Innovation Inc. 's 2. 60β — meaning ONTO is approximately 417% more volatile than GWRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 178% for Progress Software Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) is pulling ahead at 29.
8% versus 1. 8% for Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guidewire Software, Inc. grew EPS 1192% year-over-year, compared to -116. 3% for PDF Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRGS leads at 17. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU?
Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRGS leads at 15. 7% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRGS leads at 80. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) trades at 5.
0x forward P/E versus 85. 0x for Cohu, Inc. — 80. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GWRE: 77. 1% to $245. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PDFS or PRGS or ONTO or GWRE or COHU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Guidewire Software, Inc.
(GWRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), +149. 8% 10Y return). PDF Solutions, Inc. (PDFS) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GWRE: +149. 8%, PDFS: +299. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PDFS and PRGS and ONTO and GWRE and COHU?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PDFS is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRGS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ONTO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GWRE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.