REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PDM vs HIW vs DEA vs PGRE vs BXP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
REIT - Office
REIT - Office
REIT - Office
PDM vs HIW vs DEA vs PGRE vs BXP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Office | REIT - Office | REIT - Office | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $1.06B | $2.85B | $1.08B | $1.46B | $9.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $422M | $820M | $344M | $723M | $3.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-86M | $93M | $15M | $-97M | $277M |
| Gross Margin | 19.1% | 67.4% | 49.7% | 57.2% | 60.6% |
| Operating Margin | 13.9% | 25.6% | 24.9% | 14.7% | 42.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.0x | 69.5x | — | 35.9x |
| Total Debt | $2.27B | $3.64B | $1.68B | $3.68B | $17.36B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $731K | $27M | $23M | $375M | $1.48B |
PDM vs HIW vs DEA vs PGRE vs BXP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Piedmont Office Rea… (PDM) | 100 | 50.7 | -49.3% |
| Highwoods Propertie… (HIW) | 100 | 67.5 | -32.5% |
| Easterly Government… (DEA) | 100 | 37.2 | -62.8% |
| Paramount Group, In… (PGRE) | 100 | 85.5 | -14.5% |
| BXP, Inc. (BXP) | 100 | 69.6 | -30.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PDM vs HIW vs DEA vs PGRE vs BXP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, PDM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HIW has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and defensive.
- -5.8% 10Y total return vs DEA's -10.5%
- Beta 0.76, yield 7.6%, current ratio 42.45x
- 11.4% margin vs PDM's -20.5%
- 1.5% ROA vs PDM's -2.2%, ROIC 2.7% vs 1.5%
DEA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 9.0%
- 11.3% FFO/revenue growth vs HIW's -2.4%
- 9.0% yield, vs HIW's 7.6%
PGRE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 91.7%, current ratio 7.76x
- Beta 0.31 vs PDM's 1.08, lower leverage
- +42.9% vs HIW's -4.7%
BXP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth 18.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.3% FFO/revenue growth vs HIW's -2.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.4% margin vs PDM's -20.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs PDM's 1.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.0% yield, vs HIW's 7.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.9% vs HIW's -4.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.5% ROA vs PDM's -2.2%, ROIC 2.7% vs 1.5% |
PDM vs HIW vs DEA vs PGRE vs BXP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PDM vs HIW vs DEA vs PGRE vs BXP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HIW leads in 1 of 6 categories
PGRE leads 1 • DEA leads 1 • PDM leads 0 • BXP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HIW and DEA and BXP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXP is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 10.1x DEA's $344M. HIW is the more profitable business, keeping 11.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PDM's -20.5%. On growth, DEA holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $422M | $820M | $344M | $723M | $3.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $229M | $511M | $203M | $342M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$86M | $93M | $15M | -$97M | $277M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $47M | $318M | $262M | $165M | $690M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.1% | +67.4% | +49.7% | +57.2% | +60.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +25.6% | +24.9% | +14.7% | +42.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -20.5% | +11.4% | +4.3% | -13.5% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +38.7% | +76.2% | +22.9% | +19.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +6.8% | +10.6% | -11.3% | +2.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.0% | -67.8% | -55.4% | -191.5% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PGRE and BXP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.8x trailing earnings, HIW trades at a 78% valuation discount to DEA's 80.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BXP's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DEA's 13.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $2.8B | $1.1B | $1.5B | $9.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $6.5B | $2.7B | $4.8B | $25.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.61x | 17.81x | 80.31x | -31.43x | 34.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 39.98x | 69.52x | — | 35.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.86x | 12.80x | 13.85x | 12.29x | 8.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.87x | 3.53x | 3.21x | 1.93x | 2.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.70x | 1.17x | 0.77x | 0.36x | 1.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.09x | 4.16x | 5.53x | 13.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HIW leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIW delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-6 for PDM. PGRE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.92x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXP's 2.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PGRE scores 7/9 vs DEA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.7% | +3.8% | +1.1% | -2.4% | +3.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | +1.5% | +0.4% | -1.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.5% | +2.7% | +2.1% | +1.5% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +3.5% | +3.6% | +1.9% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.52x | 1.49x | 1.23x | 0.92x | 2.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.3B | $3.6B | $1.7B | $3.3B | $15.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $731,000 | $27M | $23M | $375M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.3B | $3.6B | $1.7B | $3.7B | $17.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.35x | 2.07x | 1.18x | 0.95x | 1.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PGRE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIW five years ago would be worth $8,050 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,046 for PDM. Over the past 12 months, PGRE leads with a +42.9% total return vs HIW's -4.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PGRE at 14.9% vs DEA's -6.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | +1.7% | +11.4% | — | -10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.8% | -4.7% | +21.4% | +42.9% | -1.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.9% | +45.5% | -17.4% | +51.6% | +39.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.5% | -19.5% | -37.9% | -30.6% | -26.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.2% | -5.8% | -10.5% | -45.5% | -26.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.7% | +13.3% | -6.2% | +14.9% | +11.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DEA and PGRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PGRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PDM's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DEA currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs BXP's 75.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 0.76x | 0.51x | 0.31x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.19 | $32.76 | $24.94 | $7.85 | $79.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.32 | $20.45 | $19.82 | $4.47 | $49.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +78.8% | +93.4% | +84.1% | +75.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.3 | 65.5 | 53.5 | 56.8 | 59.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.3M | 386K | 1.5M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
DEA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PDM as "Hold", HIW as "Hold", DEA as "Hold", PGRE as "Hold", BXP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for PGRE (target: $12) vs -29.5% for DEA (target: $16). For income investors, DEA offers the higher dividend yield at 9.01% vs PGRE's 1.59%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $27.00 | $16.41 | $12.00 | $72.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 22 | 8 | 13 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +7.6% | +9.0% | +1.6% | +6.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.25 | $1.96 | $2.10 | $0.11 | $4.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
HIW leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). PGRE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
PDM vs HIW vs DEA vs PGRE vs BXP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PDM or HIW or DEA or PGRE or BXP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 4% for Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW). Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) offers the better valuation at 17. 8x trailing P/E (40. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BXP, Inc. (BXP) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PDM or HIW or DEA or PGRE or BXP?
On trailing P/E, Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) is the cheapest at 17. 8x versus Easterly Government Properties, Inc. at 80. 3x. On forward P/E, BXP, Inc. is actually cheaper at 35. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PDM or HIW or DEA or PGRE or BXP?
Over the past 5 years, Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) delivered a total return of -19. 5%, compared to -39. 5% for Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIW returned -5. 8% versus PGRE's -45. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PDM or HIW or DEA or PGRE or BXP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paramount Group, Inc.
(PGRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. 's 1. 08β — meaning PDM is approximately 249% more volatile than PGRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Paramount Group, Inc. (PGRE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 92% versus 2% for BXP, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PDM or HIW or DEA or PGRE or BXP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus -2. 4% for Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BXP, Inc. grew EPS 1833% year-over-year, compared to -37. 0% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DEA leads at 4. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PDM or HIW or DEA or PGRE or BXP?
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 8% net margin versus -14. 8% for Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BXP leads at 55. 7% versus 14. 1% for PDM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIW leads at 67. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PDM or HIW or DEA or PGRE or BXP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BXP, Inc.
(BXP) trades at 35. 9x forward P/E versus 69. 5x for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. — 33. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PGRE: 81. 8% to $12. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PDM or HIW or DEA or PGRE or BXP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA) offers the highest yield at 9. 0%, versus 1. 6% for Paramount Group, Inc. (PGRE).
09Is PDM or HIW or DEA or PGRE or BXP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Paramount Group, Inc.
(PGRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31), 1. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PGRE: -45. 5%, PDM: -23. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PDM and HIW and DEA and PGRE and BXP?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PDM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIW is a small-cap deep-value stock; DEA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PGRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BXP is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.