Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PDS vs HP vs NBR vs PTEN vs NINE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PDS
Precision Drilling Corporation

Oil & Gas Drilling

EnergyNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.17B
5Y Perf.+724.3%
HP
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

Oil & Gas Drilling

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.68B
5Y Perf.+83.3%
NBR
Nabors Industries Ltd.

Oil & Gas Drilling

EnergyNYSE • BM
Market Cap$1.54B
5Y Perf.+160.4%
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.

Oil & Gas Drilling

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.33B
5Y Perf.+209.2%
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$427M
5Y Perf.+385.2%

PDS vs HP vs NBR vs PTEN vs NINE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PDS logoPDS
HP logoHP
NBR logoNBR
PTEN logoPTEN
NINE logoNINE
IndustryOil & Gas DrillingOil & Gas DrillingOil & Gas DrillingOil & Gas DrillingOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$1.17B$3.68B$1.54B$4.33B$427M
Revenue (TTM)$1.87B$4.00B$3.18B$4.66B$571M
Net Income (TTM)$-15M$-376M$263M$-119M$-41M
Gross Margin33.5%11.3%25.0%8.8%11.5%
Operating Margin12.2%-1.8%13.8%-1.6%2.0%
Forward P/E10.9x5.6x
Total Debt$791M$2.32B$2.57B$1.28B$383M
Cash & Equiv.$86M$224M$941M$421M$18M

PDS vs HP vs NBR vs PTEN vs NINELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PDS
HP
NBR
PTEN
NINE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Precision Drilling … (PDS)100824.3+724.3%
Helmerich & Payne, … (HP)100183.3+83.3%
Nabors Industries L… (NBR)100260.4+160.4%
Patterson-UTI Energ… (PTEN)100309.2+209.2%
Nine Energy Service… (NINE)100485.2+385.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PDS vs HP vs NBR vs PTEN vs NINE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NBR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Precision Drilling Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. HP, PTEN, and NINE also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PDS
Precision Drilling Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

PDS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 8.6% 10Y total return vs HP's -3.5%
  • Beta 0.52 vs NINE's 3.21
Best for: long-term compounding
HP
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
The Growth Leader

HP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 35.9% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
Best for: growth
NBR
Nabors Industries Ltd.
The Growth Play

NBR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth 176.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 8.3% margin vs HP's -9.4%
  • 5.3% ROA vs NINE's -11.5%, ROIC 6.2% vs 0.7%
Best for: growth exposure
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.
The Income Pick

PTEN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.59, yield 2.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.59, Low D/E 39.7%, current ratio 1.64x
  • Beta 0.59, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.64x
  • 2.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HP's 2.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

NINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +15.1% vs HP's +99.5%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHP logoHP35.9% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
ValueNBR logoNBRBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsNBR logoNBR8.3% margin vs HP's -9.4%
Stability / SafetyPDS logoPDSBeta 0.52 vs NINE's 3.21
DividendsPTEN logoPTEN2.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HP's 2.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)NINE logoNINE+15.1% vs HP's +99.5%
Efficiency (ROA)NBR logoNBR5.3% ROA vs NINE's -11.5%, ROIC 6.2% vs 0.7%

PDS vs HP vs NBR vs PTEN vs NINE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PDSPrecision Drilling Corporation
FY 2025
Other Services
100.0%$2M
HPHelmerich & Payne, Inc.
FY 2025
North America Solutions
64.1%$2.4B
International Solutions Segment
21.8%$802M
Offshore Gulfof Mexico
14.1%$520M
NBRNabors Industries Ltd.
FY 2025
International Drilling
72.4%$1.6B
Drilling Solutions
23.2%$513M
Rig Technologies
7.0%$154M
Other Operating Segment
-2.6%$-57,035,000
PTENPatterson-UTI Energy, Inc.
FY 2025
Completion Services
59.9%$2.9B
Drilling Services
32.3%$1.6B
Drilling Products
7.1%$344M
Other
0.7%$33M
NINENine Energy Service, Inc.
FY 2025
Service Revenue
38.4%$431M
Cement
18.8%$211M
Tool Revenue
11.6%$131M
Tools
11.6%$131M
Wireline
10.3%$116M
Coiled Tubing
9.3%$104M

PDS vs HP vs NBR vs PTEN vs NINE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNBRLAGGINGPTEN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NBR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

PTEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 8.2x NINE's $571M. NBR is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HP's -9.4%. On growth, NBR holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPDS logoPDSPrecision Drillin…HP logoHPHelmerich & Payne…NBR logoNBRNabors Industries…PTEN logoPTENPatterson-UTI Ene…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.9B$4.0B$3.2B$4.7B$571M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$556M$657M$1.1B$851M$61M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$15M-$376M$263M-$119M-$41M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$144M$256M-$23M$273M-$7M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+33.5%+11.3%+25.0%+8.8%+11.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+12.2%-1.8%+13.8%-1.6%+2.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.8%-9.4%+8.3%-2.6%-7.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.7%+6.4%-0.7%+5.9%-1.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.3%-8.2%+9.3%-12.7%-4.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-38.6%-47.8%+102.5%-34.6%
NBR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NBR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 5.6x trailing earnings, NBR trades at a 99% valuation discount to PDS's 876.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NBR's 3.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.0x.

MetricPDS logoPDSPrecision Drillin…HP logoHPHelmerich & Payne…NBR logoNBRNabors Industries…PTEN logoPTENPatterson-UTI Ene…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
Market CapShares × price$1.2B$3.7B$1.5B$4.3B$427M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.7B$5.8B$3.2B$5.2B$791M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS876.46x-22.23x5.62x-47.54x-7.88x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.91x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.70x6.74x3.47x5.67x337.01x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.87x0.98x0.48x0.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.03x1.29x0.97x1.36x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.74x31.61x11.64x
NBR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NBR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NBR delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-14 for HP. PTEN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NBR's 1.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PDS scores 7/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPDS logoPDSPrecision Drillin…HP logoHPHelmerich & Payne…NBR logoNBRNabors Industries…PTEN logoPTENPatterson-UTI Ene…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-0.9%-13.6%+17.8%-3.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.6%-5.7%+5.3%-2.2%-11.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.4%+3.7%+6.2%-0.4%+0.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.8%+4.1%+6.8%-0.5%+0.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–973751
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.50x0.82x1.78x0.40x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$705M$2.1B$1.6B$860M$364M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$86M$224M$941M$421M$18M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$791M$2.3B$2.6B$1.3B$383M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.94x-1.92x3.07x-0.96x0.24x
NBR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NINE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $48,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,746 for NBR. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1505.8% total return vs HP's +99.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NINE at 35.7% vs NBR's 0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPDS logoPDSPrecision Drillin…HP logoHPHelmerich & Payne…NBR logoNBRNabors Industries…PTEN logoPTENPatterson-UTI Ene…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+22.1%+24.1%+74.2%+77.9%+2682.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+126.1%+99.5%+273.7%+111.0%+1505.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+86.4%+29.1%+0.6%+17.3%+150.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+221.2%+44.0%-2.5%+48.7%+385.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+8.6%-3.5%-67.0%-22.1%-62.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+23.1%+8.9%+0.2%+5.5%+35.7%
NINE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PDS and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PDS is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs PDS's 86.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPDS logoPDSPrecision Drillin…HP logoHPHelmerich & Payne…NBR logoNBRNabors Industries…PTEN logoPTENPatterson-UTI Ene…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.52x0.87x1.53x0.59x3.21x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$103.80$41.68$105.80$12.62$10.23
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$39.67$14.65$23.27$5.10$0.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+86.6%+88.5%+91.2%+90.4%+96.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.960.762.355.482.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded127K1.2M348K10.6M125K
Evenly matched — PDS and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — PDS and PTEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PDS as "Buy", HP as "Hold", NBR as "Hold", PTEN as "Buy", NINE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -16.1% for NBR (target: $81). For income investors, PTEN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.80% vs NBR's 0.43%.

MetricPDS logoPDSPrecision Drillin…HP logoHPHelmerich & Payne…NBR logoNBRNabors Industries…PTEN logoPTENPatterson-UTI Ene…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$113.50$36.86$81.00$11.00$18.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts244344539
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.8%+0.4%+2.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises30111
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.01$0.42$0.32
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+4.7%0.0%0.0%+1.6%0.0%
Evenly matched — PDS and PTEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NBR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NINE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallNabors Industries Ltd. (NBR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PDS vs HP vs NBR vs PTEN vs NINE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PDS or HP or NBR or PTEN or NINE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

(HP) is the stronger pick with 35. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Precision Drilling Corporation (PDS) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PDS or HP or NBR or PTEN or NINE?

On trailing P/E, Nabors Industries Ltd.

(NBR) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus Precision Drilling Corporation at 876. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PDS or HP or NBR or PTEN or NINE?

Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.

(NINE) delivered a total return of +385. 2%, compared to -2. 5% for Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PDS returned +8. 6% versus NBR's -67. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PDS or HP or NBR or PTEN or NINE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Precision Drilling Corporation (PDS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

52β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately 512% more volatile than PDS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 178% for Nabors Industries Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PDS or HP or NBR or PTEN or NINE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

(HP) is pulling ahead at 35. 9% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nabors Industries Ltd. grew EPS 176. 7% year-over-year, compared to -148. 4% for Helmerich & Payne, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTEN leads at 22. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PDS or HP or NBR or PTEN or NINE?

Nabors Industries Ltd.

(NBR) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 8% net margin versus -7. 2% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PDS leads at 9. 3% versus -0. 5% for PTEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBR leads at 19. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PDS or HP or NBR or PTEN or NINE more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 82.

7% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PDS or HP or NBR or PTEN or NINE?

In this comparison, PTEN (2.

8% yield), HP (2. 8% yield), NBR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. PDS, NINE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PDS or HP or NBR or PTEN or NINE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.

(PTEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 59), 2. 8% yield). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTEN: -22. 1%, NINE: -62. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PDS and HP and NBR and PTEN and NINE?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PDS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HP is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBR is a small-cap deep-value stock; PTEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NINE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HP, PTEN pay a dividend while PDS, NBR, NINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PDS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NBR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PTEN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NINE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PDS and HP and NBR and PTEN and NINE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PDS: 6.3% · HP: -8.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.