Oil & Gas Drilling
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PDS vs NBR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
PDS vs NBR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Drilling |
| Market Cap | $1.19B | $1.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.87B | $3.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $263M |
| Gross Margin | 33.5% | 25.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | 13.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.1x | 5.8x |
| Total Debt | $791M | $2.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $86M | $941M |
PDS vs NBR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Precision Drilling … (PDS) | 100 | 839.2 | +739.2% |
| Nabors Industries L… (NBR) | 100 | 268.3 | +168.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PDS vs NBR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PDS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.52
- 3.6% 10Y total return vs NBR's -67.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 49.8%, current ratio 1.62x
NBR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth 176.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- 8.7% revenue growth vs PDS's -3.2%
- Lower P/E (5.8x vs 11.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.7% revenue growth vs PDS's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.8x vs 11.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs PDS's -0.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs NBR's 1.53, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +277.3% vs PDS's +123.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs PDS's -0.6%, ROIC 6.2% vs 5.4% |
PDS vs NBR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PDS vs NBR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 1.7x PDS's $1.9B. NBR is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PDS's -0.8%. On growth, NBR holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $556M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | $263M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $144M | -$23M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.5% | +25.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +13.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | -0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.3% | +9.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -38.6% | +102.5% |
Valuation Metrics
NBR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.8x trailing earnings, NBR trades at a 99% valuation discount to PDS's 888.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NBR's 3.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PDS's 4.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 888.60x | 5.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.11x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.75x | 3.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.88x | 0.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.89x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBR leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBR delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-1 for PDS. PDS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NBR's 1.78x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.9% | +17.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.50x | 1.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $705M | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $86M | $941M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $791M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.94x | 3.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PDS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PDS five years ago would be worth $33,355 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,845 for NBR. Over the past 12 months, NBR leads with a +277.3% total return vs PDS's +123.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PDS at 23.8% vs NBR's 1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.3% | +79.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +123.9% | +277.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.8% | +3.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +233.6% | +8.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.6% | -67.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.8% | +1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PDS and NBR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PDS is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBR's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBR currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs PDS's 88.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $103.80 | $105.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.67 | $23.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.2% | +94.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.3 | 73.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 126K | 349K |
Analyst Outlook
PDS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PDS as "Buy" and NBR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.0% upside for PDS (target: $114) vs -18.5% for NBR (target: $81). NBR is the only dividend payer here at 0.42% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $113.50 | $81.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.42 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.7% | 0.0% |
NBR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PDS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
PDS vs NBR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PDS or NBR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nabors Industries Ltd.
(NBR) is the stronger pick with 8. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Precision Drilling Corporation (PDS). Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Precision Drilling Corporation (PDS) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PDS or NBR?
On trailing P/E, Nabors Industries Ltd.
(NBR) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus Precision Drilling Corporation at 888. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PDS or NBR?
Over the past 5 years, Precision Drilling Corporation (PDS) delivered a total return of +233.
6%, compared to +8. 5% for Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PDS returned +3. 6% versus NBR's -67. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PDS or NBR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Precision Drilling Corporation (PDS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
52β versus Nabors Industries Ltd. 's 1. 53β — meaning NBR is approximately 192% more volatile than PDS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Precision Drilling Corporation (PDS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 178% for Nabors Industries Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PDS or NBR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nabors Industries Ltd.
(NBR) is pulling ahead at 8. 7% versus -3. 2% for Precision Drilling Corporation (PDS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nabors Industries Ltd. grew EPS 176. 7% year-over-year, compared to -98. 2% for Precision Drilling Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NBR leads at 6. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PDS or NBR?
Nabors Industries Ltd.
(NBR) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 8% net margin versus 0. 1% for Precision Drilling Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PDS leads at 9. 3% versus 8. 3% for NBR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBR leads at 19. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PDS or NBR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PDS: 24.
0% to $113. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PDS or NBR?
In this comparison, NBR (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. PDS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PDS or NBR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Precision Drilling Corporation (PDS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
52)). Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PDS: +3. 6%, NBR: -67. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PDS and NBR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PDS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.