Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PEBO logo
PEBO
CIVB logo
CIVB
KO logo
KO
FFBC logo
FFBC
OVBC logo
OVBC
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PEBO vs CIVB vs KO vs FFBC vs OVBC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PEBO
Peoples Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.31B
5Y Perf.+72.0%
CIVB
Civista Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$564M
5Y Perf.+76.7%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
FFBC
First Financial Bancorp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.38B
5Y Perf.+132.5%
OVBC
Ohio Valley Banc Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$236M
5Y Perf.+122.3%

PEBO vs CIVB vs KO vs FFBC vs OVBC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PEBO logoPEBO
CIVB logoCIVB
KO logoKO
FFBC logoFFBC
OVBC logoOVBC
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$1.31B$564M$355.61B$3.38B$236M
Revenue (TTM)$593M$253M$49.28B$1.26B$94M
Net Income (TTM)$107M$46M$13.70B$256M$16M
Gross Margin66.0%66.0%61.7%68.4%67.6%
Operating Margin19.4%21.9%29.3%25.5%20.6%
Forward P/E10.7x9.6x25.3x10.2x15.1x
Total Debt$734M$284M$45.49B$1.19B$55M
Cash & Equiv.$189M$77M$10.27B$179M$15K

PEBO vs CIVB vs KO vs FFBC vs OVBCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PEBO
CIVB
KO
FFBC
OVBC
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO)100172.0+72.0%
Civista Bancshares,… (CIVB)100176.7+76.7%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
First Financial Ban… (FFBC)100232.5+132.5%
Ohio Valley Banc Co… (OVBC)100222.3+122.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PEBO vs CIVB vs KO vs FFBC vs OVBC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: OVBC leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Peoples Bancorp Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. KO also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇OVBC emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
PEBO
Peoples Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

PEBO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 4.5%
  • PEG 0.92 vs KO's 2.26
  • NIM 3.7% vs FFBC's 3.0%
  • Lower P/E (10.7x vs 15.1x), PEG 0.92 vs 1.66
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
CIVB
Civista Bancshares, Inc.
The Financial Play

CIVB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.

  • 27.8% margin vs OVBC's 16.6%
  • 13.1% ROA vs OVBC's 1.0%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.9%
Best for: quality and efficiency
FFBC
First Financial Bancorp.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, FFBC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
OVBC
Ohio Valley Banc Corp.
The Banking Pick

OVBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 42.1%
  • 168.3% 10Y total return vs CIVB's 166.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 32.4%, current ratio 56092.09x
  • Beta 0.45, yield 1.8%, current ratio 56092.09x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthOVBC logoOVBC5.9% NII/revenue growth vs PEBO's 0.4%
ValuePEBO logoPEBOLower P/E (10.7x vs 15.1x), PEG 0.92 vs 1.66
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs OVBC's 16.6%
Stability / SafetyOVBC logoOVBCBeta 0.45 vs FFBC's 0.84, lower leverage
DividendsPEBO logoPEBO4.5% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)OVBC logoOVBC+60.9% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs OVBC's 1.0%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.9%

PEBO vs CIVB vs KO vs FFBC vs OVBC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PEBOPeoples Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Fiduciary and Trust
100.0%$12M
CIVBCivista Bancshares, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
FFBCFirst Financial Bancorp.

Segment breakdown not available.

OVBCOhio Valley Banc Corp.
FY 2019
Deposit Account
78.7%$2M
Mortgage Banking
11.5%$310,000
Fiduciary and Trust
9.8%$264,000

PEBO vs CIVB vs KO vs FFBC vs OVBC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGFFBC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — KO and FFBC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 523.1x OVBC's $94M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OVBC's 16.6%.

MetricPEBO logoPEBOPeoples Bancorp I…CIVB logoCIVBCivista Bancshare…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FFBC logoFFBCFirst Financial B…OVBC logoOVBCOhio Valley Banc …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$593M$253M$49.3B$1.3B$94M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$121M$56M$15.5B$343M$19M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$107M$46M$13.7B$256M$16M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$122M$17M$12.6B$330M$17M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+66.0%+66.0%+61.7%+68.4%+67.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.4%+21.9%+29.3%+25.5%+20.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+18.0%+18.3%+27.8%+20.3%+16.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.6%+6.5%+25.5%+26.2%+18.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+17.1%-3.2%+18.2%-5.9%+58.5%
Evenly matched — KO and FFBC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — PEBO and CIVB each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.3x trailing earnings, CIVB trades at a 62% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PEBO offers better value at 1.06x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPEBO logoPEBOPeoples Bancorp I…CIVB logoCIVBCivista Bancshare…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FFBC logoFFBCFirst Financial B…OVBC logoOVBCOhio Valley Banc …
Market CapShares × price$1.3B$564M$355.6B$3.4B$236M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.9B$771M$390.8B$4.4B$291M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.24x10.31x27.18x12.14x15.14x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.68x9.63x25.27x10.17x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.06x1.81x2.43x1.12x1.66x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.80x13.95x26.39x12.78x14.98x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.13x2.21x7.42x2.68x2.51x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.07x0.88x10.40x1.12x1.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.21x12.77x67.15x10.65x13.87x
Evenly matched — PEBO and CIVB each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $9 for PEBO. OVBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OVBC scores 8/9 vs PEBO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPEBO logoPEBOPeoples Bancorp I…CIVB logoCIVBCivista Bancshare…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FFBC logoFFBCFirst Financial B…OVBC logoOVBCOhio Valley Banc …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.1%+10.0%+41.1%+9.8%+9.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%+1.1%+13.1%+1.3%+1.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.8%+5.0%+15.8%+6.4%+6.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.0%+2.3%+17.3%+8.5%+2.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946778
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.61x0.52x1.33x0.43x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$545M$207M$35.2B$1.0B$55M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$189M$77M$10.3B$179M$14,845
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$734M$284M$45.5B$1.2B$55M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.72x0.67x10.70x0.89x0.71x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

OVBC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in OVBC five years ago would be worth $23,382 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,319 for CIVB. Over the past 12 months, OVBC leads with a +60.9% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OVBC at 28.4% vs PEBO's 13.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPEBO logoPEBOPeoples Bancorp I…CIVB logoCIVBCivista Bancshare…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FFBC logoFFBCFirst Financial B…OVBC logoOVBCOhio Valley Banc …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+24.1%+26.0%+20.3%+30.7%+28.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+27.8%+22.3%+17.2%+39.4%+60.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+46.6%+79.6%+47.0%+63.9%+111.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+42.6%+33.2%+65.6%+48.6%+133.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+132.4%+166.6%+121.1%+111.1%+168.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+13.6%+21.6%+13.7%+17.9%+28.4%
OVBC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KO and FFBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFBC's 0.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FFBC currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs CIVB's 96.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPEBO logoPEBOPeoples Bancorp I…CIVB logoCIVBCivista Bancshare…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FFBC logoFFBCFirst Financial B…OVBC logoOVBCOhio Valley Banc …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.63x0.72x-0.20x0.84x0.45x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$36.64$28.31$84.04$32.30$50.66
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$27.49$18.95$65.35$22.93$27.51
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.9%+96.1%+98.3%+100.0%+99.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.066.460.664.163.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded225K78K12.7M800K26K
Evenly matched — KO and FFBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — PEBO and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PEBO as "Hold", CIVB as "Buy", KO as "Buy", FFBC as "Hold", OVBC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.2% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -0.8% for CIVB (target: $27). For income investors, PEBO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.49% vs OVBC's 1.82%.

MetricPEBO logoPEBOPeoples Bancorp I…CIVB logoCIVBCivista Bancshare…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FFBC logoFFBCFirst Financial B…OVBC logoOVBCOhio Valley Banc …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$38.00$27.00$86.13$32.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts11848191
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.5%+2.5%+2.5%+3.1%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10145623
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.64$0.68$2.04$0.99$0.91
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%+0.0%+0.2%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — PEBO and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). OVBC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PEBO vs CIVB vs KO vs FFBC vs OVBC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PEBO or CIVB or KO or FFBC or OVBC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ohio Valley Banc Corp.

(OVBC) is the stronger pick with 5. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO). Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PEBO or CIVB or KO or FFBC or OVBC?

On trailing P/E, Civista Bancshares, Inc.

(CIVB) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Civista Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Peoples Bancorp Inc. wins at 0. 92x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PEBO or CIVB or KO or FFBC or OVBC?

Over the past 5 years, Ohio Valley Banc Corp.

(OVBC) delivered a total return of +133. 8%, compared to +33. 2% for Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OVBC returned +168. 3% versus FFBC's +111. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PEBO or CIVB or KO or FFBC or OVBC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus First Financial Bancorp. 's 0. 84β — meaning FFBC is approximately -520% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ohio Valley Banc Corp. (OVBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PEBO or CIVB or KO or FFBC or OVBC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ohio Valley Banc Corp.

(OVBC) is pulling ahead at 5. 9% versus 0. 4% for Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ohio Valley Banc Corp. grew EPS 42. 1% year-over-year, compared to -9. 7% for Peoples Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PEBO or CIVB or KO or FFBC or OVBC?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 16. 6% for Ohio Valley Banc Corp. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 20. 6% for OVBC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFBC leads at 68. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PEBO or CIVB or KO or FFBC or OVBC more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 4. 2% to $86. 13.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PEBO or CIVB or KO or FFBC or OVBC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 1. 8% for Ohio Valley Banc Corp. (OVBC).

09

Is PEBO or CIVB or KO or FFBC or OVBC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, FFBC: +111. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PEBO and CIVB and KO and FFBC and OVBC?

These companies operate in different sectors (PEBO (Financial Services) and CIVB (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and FFBC (Financial Services) and OVBC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PEBO is a small-cap deep-value stock; CIVB is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; FFBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; OVBC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.