Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PEBO vs FMNB vs JPM vs FIS vs OVBC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Information Technology Services
Banks - Regional
PEBO vs FMNB vs JPM vs FIS vs OVBC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Information Technology Services | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.31B | $571M | $896.00B | $20.26B | $236M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $593M | $278M | $280.33B | $11.66B | $94M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $107M | $55M | $57.05B | $2.67B | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 66.0% | 64.6% | 60.0% | 37.6% | 67.6% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 23.4% | 25.9% | 17.9% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 9.6x | 14.4x | 6.2x | 15.1x |
| Total Debt | $734M | $368M | $942.38B | $4.01B | $55M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $189M | $20M | $343.34B | $599M | $15K |
PEBO vs FMNB vs JPM vs FIS vs OVBC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO) | 100 | 172.0 | +72.0% |
| Farmers National Ba… (FMNB) | 100 | 122.5 | +22.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| Ohio Valley Banc Co… (OVBC) | 100 | 222.3 | +122.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PEBO vs FMNB vs JPM vs FIS vs OVBC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PEBO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 4.5%
- NIM 3.7% vs JPM's 2.2%
FMNB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.7% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs OVBC's 168.3%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.26 vs OVBC's 1.66
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 15.1x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.66
- 22.9% margin vs OVBC's 16.6%
- 7.5% ROA vs OVBC's 1.0%, ROIC 6.0% vs 6.9%
OVBC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 42.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 32.4%, current ratio 56092.09x
- Beta 0.45, yield 1.8%, current ratio 56092.09x
- 5.9% NII/revenue growth vs PEBO's 0.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.9% NII/revenue growth vs PEBO's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 15.1x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.66 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs OVBC's 16.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.9% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs OVBC's 1.0%, ROIC 6.0% vs 6.9% |
PEBO vs FMNB vs JPM vs FIS vs OVBC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PEBO vs FMNB vs JPM vs FIS vs OVBC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories
PEBO leads 0 • FMNB leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • OVBC leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2975.7x OVBC's $94M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OVBC's 16.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $593M | $278M | $280.3B | $11.7B | $94M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $121M | $70M | $81.4B | $4.1B | $19M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $107M | $55M | $57.0B | $2.7B | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $122M | $45M | $100.9B | $2.8B | $17M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.0% | +64.6% | +60.0% | +37.6% | +67.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +23.4% | +25.9% | +17.9% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +19.6% | +20.4% | +22.9% | +16.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +16.1% | +36.0% | +23.9% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +30.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.1% | +2.6% | +16.0% | +30.6% | +58.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, FMNB trades at a 81% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs FIS's 2.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $571M | $896.0B | $20.3B | $236M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $918M | $1.50T | $23.7B | $291M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.24x | 10.02x | 16.00x | 52.27x | 15.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.68x | 9.62x | 14.40x | 6.24x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.06x | — | 0.90x | 2.14x | 1.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.80x | 14.12x | 18.36x | 6.50x | 14.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.13x | 2.10x | 3.20x | 1.90x | 2.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 1.13x | 2.47x | 1.46x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.21x | 10.95x | 8.88x | 7.21x | 13.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FIS and OVBC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $9 for PEBO. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OVBC scores 8/9 vs PEBO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.1% | +12.0% | +15.9% | +18.4% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.0% | +1.3% | +7.5% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +5.9% | +4.5% | +6.0% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +2.4% | +8.9% | +6.6% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 0.76x | 2.60x | 0.29x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $545M | $347M | $599.0B | $3.4B | $55M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $189M | $20M | $343.3B | $599M | $14,845 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $734M | $368M | $942.4B | $4.0B | $55M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.72x | 0.71x | 0.74x | 21.16x | 0.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — JPM and OVBC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OVBC five years ago would be worth $23,382 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, OVBC leads with a +60.9% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.1% | +12.1% | -0.5% | -38.9% | +28.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.8% | +14.1% | +21.8% | -49.4% | +60.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.6% | +32.0% | +138.2% | -18.9% | +111.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.6% | +5.4% | +118.2% | -67.3% | +133.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.4% | +123.8% | +465.8% | -25.6% | +168.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.6% | +9.7% | +33.6% | -6.8% | +28.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PEBO and OVBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OVBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PEBO currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.72x | 0.94x | 0.61x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.64 | $15.50 | $337.25 | $82.74 | $50.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.49 | $12.13 | $262.71 | $37.91 | $27.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +93.7% | +95.1% | +47.4% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.0 | 62.0 | 59.1 | 30.8 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 225K | 299K | 7.0M | 5.6M | 26K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FMNB and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PEBO as "Hold", FMNB as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", OVBC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 3.8% for PEBO (target: $38). For income investors, FMNB offers the higher dividend yield at 4.66% vs OVBC's 1.82%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.00 | $16.00 | $339.75 | $62.88 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 7 | 61 | 37 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +4.7% | +1.9% | +4.2% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.64 | $0.68 | $5.95 | $1.63 | $0.91 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +7.0% | 0.0% |
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics. 5 categories are tied.
PEBO vs FMNB vs JPM vs FIS vs OVBC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PEBO or FMNB or JPM or FIS or OVBC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ohio Valley Banc Corp.
(OVBC) is the stronger pick with 5. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO). Farmers National Banc Corp. (FMNB) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PEBO or FMNB or JPM or FIS or OVBC?
On trailing P/E, Farmers National Banc Corp.
(FMNB) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Peoples Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 92x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PEBO or FMNB or JPM or FIS or OVBC?
Over the past 5 years, Ohio Valley Banc Corp.
(OVBC) delivered a total return of +133. 8%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PEBO or FMNB or JPM or FIS or OVBC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ohio Valley Banc Corp.
(OVBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 109% more volatile than OVBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PEBO or FMNB or JPM or FIS or OVBC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ohio Valley Banc Corp.
(OVBC) is pulling ahead at 5. 9% versus 0. 4% for Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ohio Valley Banc Corp. grew EPS 42. 1% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PEBO or FMNB or JPM or FIS or OVBC?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OVBC leads at 67. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PEBO or FMNB or JPM or FIS or OVBC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Peoples Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 92x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — PEBO or FMNB or JPM or FIS or OVBC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Farmers National Banc Corp. (FMNB) offers the highest yield at 4. 7%, versus 1. 8% for Ohio Valley Banc Corp. (OVBC).
09Is PEBO or FMNB or JPM or FIS or OVBC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ohio Valley Banc Corp.
(OVBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 1. 8% yield, +168. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OVBC: +168. 3%, FMNB: +123. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PEBO and FMNB and JPM and FIS and OVBC?
These companies operate in different sectors (PEBO (Financial Services) and FMNB (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and OVBC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PEBO is a small-cap deep-value stock; FMNB is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; OVBC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.