Home Improvement
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PFAI vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
PFAI vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Home Improvement | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $31M | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $286K | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 47.3% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 190.5x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $163K | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $686K | $86.81B |
PFAI vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle Food Group… (PFAI) | 100 | 126.4 | +26.4% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 147.0 | +47.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PFAI vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PFAI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.53
- Rev growth 56.6%, EPS growth -63.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 34.9%, current ratio 1.34x
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs PFAI's 0.5%
- Lower P/E (34.8x vs 190.5x)
- 12.2% margin vs PFAI's 8.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.6% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (34.8x vs 190.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs PFAI's 8.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs AMZN's 1.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs PFAI's +26.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs PFAI's 6.1% |
PFAI vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PFAI vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 225777.3x PFAI's $3M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.2% (AMZN) to 8.7% (PFAI).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.3% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.2% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.8x trailing earnings, AMZN trades at a 80% valuation discount to PFAI's 190.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMZN's 20.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PFAI's 31.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $31M | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30M | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 190.52x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.75x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.40x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 85.30x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PFAI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PFAI delivers a 61.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $61 in annual profit, vs $23 for AMZN. PFAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +61.3% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +34.7% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$523,124 | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $685,796 | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $162,672 | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,050 for PFAI. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs PFAI's +26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs PFAI's 0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +85.3% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.8% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.5% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.5% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.5% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.2% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFAI and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFAI is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs PFAI's 81.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.53x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.93 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.30 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.5% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PFAI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
PFAI vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PFAI or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI) is the stronger pick with 56.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (34. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PFAI or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the cheapest at 37. 8x versus Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares at 190. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PFAI or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to +0. 5% for Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus PFAI's +0. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PFAI or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
53β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 184% more volatile than PFAI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PFAI or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI) is pulling ahead at 56.
6% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -63. 7% for Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PFAI or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 8. 7% for Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFAI leads at 18. 7% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — PFAI or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is PFAI or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
53)). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFAI: +0. 5%, AMZN: +697. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PFAI and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PFAI is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare AMZN vs MSFT
MSFT is one of the most direct listed alternatives to AMZN.
Compare PFAI vs CLOV
CLOV is one of the most direct listed alternatives to PFAI.
Expand With MSFT + GOOGL
MSFT and GOOGL are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.