Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PFSA vs DBVT vs DXCM vs ALKS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PFSA
Profusa, Inc. Common Stock

Medical - Equipment & Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$549K
5Y Perf.-70.1%
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • FR
Market Cap$1713.21T
5Y Perf.-58.8%
DXCM
DexCom, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.59B
5Y Perf.-35.4%
ALKS
Alkermes plc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • IE
Market Cap$6.38B
5Y Perf.+134.0%

PFSA vs DBVT vs DXCM vs ALKS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PFSA logoPFSA
DBVT logoDBVT
DXCM logoDXCM
ALKS logoALKS
IndustryMedical - Equipment & ServicesBiotechnologyMedical - DevicesBiotechnology
Market Cap$549K$1713.21T$23.59B$6.38B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$4.82B$1.56B
Net Income (TTM)$-41M$-168M$930M$153M
Gross Margin61.8%65.4%
Operating Margin21.4%12.3%
Forward P/E23.7x26.8x
Total Debt$48M$22M$1.39B$70M
Cash & Equiv.$191K$194M$918M$1.12B

PFSA vs DBVT vs DXCM vs ALKSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PFSA
DBVT
DXCM
ALKS
StockMay 20May 26Return
DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT)10041.2-58.8%
DexCom, Inc. (DXCM)10064.6-35.4%
Alkermes plc (ALKS)100234.0+134.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PFSA vs DBVT vs DXCM vs ALKS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DXCM leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. DBV Technologies S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PFSA
Profusa, Inc. Common Stock
The Specific-Use Pick

PFSA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Income Pick

DBVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.26
  • +97.4% vs PFSA's -99.8%
Best for: income & stability
DXCM
DexCom, Inc.
The Growth Play

DXCM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 15.6%, EPS growth 47.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.0%
  • 299.9% 10Y total return vs ALKS's 3.5%
  • Beta 0.92, current ratio 1.88x
  • 15.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ALKS
Alkermes plc
The Defensive Pick

ALKS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthDXCM logoDXCM15.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
ValueDXCM logoDXCMBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsDXCM logoDXCM19.3% margin vs PFSA's -144.0%
Stability / SafetyDXCM logoDXCMBeta 0.92 vs PFSA's 2.99
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)DBVT logoDBVT+97.4% vs PFSA's -99.8%
Efficiency (ROA)DXCM logoDXCM13.4% ROA vs PFSA's -9.6%

PFSA vs DBVT vs DXCM vs ALKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PFSAProfusa, Inc. Common Stock

Segment breakdown not available.

DBVTDBV Technologies S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

DXCMDexCom, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ALKSAlkermes plc
FY 2025
Vivitrol
39.8%$468M
Aristada And Aristada Initio
31.5%$370M
Manufactured Product And Royalty
24.8%$291M
Manufacturing Revenue
3.9%$46M

PFSA vs DBVT vs DXCM vs ALKS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLDXCMLAGGINGDBVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DXCM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

DXCM and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $4.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. DXCM is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKS's 9.8%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPFSA logoPFSAProfusa, Inc. Com…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plc
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$4.8B$1.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$31M-$112M$1.2B$212M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$41M-$168M$930M$153M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$12M-$151M$1.4B$392M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+61.8%+65.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+21.4%+12.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+19.3%+9.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+29.7%+25.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.0%+28.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+45.7%+91.5%+88.9%-4.1%
DXCM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ALKS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 26.8x trailing earnings, ALKS trades at a 8% valuation discount to DXCM's 29.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ALKS's 19.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DXCM's 20.7x.

MetricPFSA logoPFSAProfusa, Inc. Com…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plc
Market CapShares × price$548,941$1713.21T$23.6B$6.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$49M$1713.21T$24.1B$5.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.02x-0.76x29.25x26.78x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.23.71x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.79x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.68x18.97x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.06x4.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.66x9.03x3.55x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.90x13.29x
ALKS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

DXCM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

DXCM delivers a 33.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DXCM's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DXCM scores 8/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPFSA logoPFSAProfusa, Inc. Com…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plc
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-130.2%+33.8%+8.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-9.6%-89.0%+13.4%+5.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+18.7%+18.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-145.7%+23.5%+14.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94487
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x0.51x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$48M-$172M$472M-$1.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$191,000$194M$918M$1.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$48M$22M$1.4B$70M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-10.77x-189.82x57.21x32.30x
DXCM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ALKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $17,063 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $24 for PFSA. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +97.4% total return vs PFSA's -99.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALKS at 7.1% vs PFSA's -86.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPFSA logoPFSAProfusa, Inc. Com…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plc
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-94.1%+5.0%-8.1%+35.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-99.8%+97.4%-28.1%+22.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%+1.0%-49.8%+22.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%-66.9%-26.7%+70.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%-86.7%+299.9%+3.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-86.7%+0.3%-20.5%+7.1%
ALKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — DXCM and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

DXCM is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PFSA's 2.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs PFSA's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPFSA logoPFSAProfusa, Inc. Com…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plc
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.99x1.26x0.92x1.00x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$412.50$26.18$89.98$38.45
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.10$7.53$54.11$25.17
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.1%+76.4%+67.9%+99.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.750.340.960.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.7M243K4.0M2.2M
Evenly matched — DXCM and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", DXCM as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.7% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 20.1% for ALKS (target: $46).

MetricPFSA logoPFSAProfusa, Inc. Com…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …DXCM logoDXCMDexCom, Inc.ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plc
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$46.33$80.88$46.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts155228
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+2.1%+0.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

DXCM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ALKS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallDexCom, Inc. (DXCM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PFSA vs DBVT vs DXCM vs ALKS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PFSA or DBVT or DXCM or ALKS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, DexCom, Inc.

(DXCM) is the stronger pick with 15. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 26. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PFSA or DBVT or DXCM or ALKS?

On trailing P/E, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the cheapest at 26.

8x versus DexCom, Inc. at 29. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PFSA or DBVT or DXCM or ALKS?

Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +70.

6%, compared to -99. 8% for Profusa, Inc. Common Stock (PFSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DXCM returned +299. 9% versus PFSA's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PFSA or DBVT or DXCM or ALKS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DexCom, Inc.

(DXCM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Profusa, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 99β — meaning PFSA is approximately 224% more volatile than DXCM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 51% for DexCom, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PFSA or DBVT or DXCM or ALKS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), DexCom, Inc.

(DXCM) is pulling ahead at 15. 6% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DexCom, Inc. grew EPS 47. 2% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DXCM leads at 17. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PFSA or DBVT or DXCM or ALKS?

DexCom, Inc.

(DXCM) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 9% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 17. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DXCM leads at 19. 6% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PFSA or DBVT or DXCM or ALKS more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131.

7% to $46. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PFSA or DBVT or DXCM or ALKS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is PFSA or DBVT or DXCM or ALKS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, DexCom, Inc.

(DXCM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), +299. 9% 10Y return). Profusa, Inc. Common Stock (PFSA) carries a higher beta of 2. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DXCM: +299. 9%, PFSA: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PFSA and DBVT and DXCM and ALKS?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PFSA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; DXCM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PFSA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DBVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DXCM

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALKS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.