Medical - Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PFSA vs PODD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
PFSA vs PODD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Equipment & Services | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $604K | $11.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-41M | $303M |
| Gross Margin | — | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.2x |
| Total Debt | $48M | $1.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $191K | $716M |
Quick Verdict: PFSA vs PODD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PFSA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 9.7%
PODD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.68
- 439.0% 10Y total return vs PFSA's -99.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 69.4%, current ratio 2.78x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.7% revenue growth vs PFSA's -44.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs PFSA's -144.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs PFSA's 3.08 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -39.3% vs PFSA's -99.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.6% ROA vs PFSA's -9.6% |
PFSA vs PODD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PFSA vs PODD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PODD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PODD and PFSA operate at a comparable scale, with $2.9B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | $582M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$41M | $303M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $416M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +71.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +10.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +33.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.7% | +160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PFSA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $603,773 | $11.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49M | $11.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.02x | 46.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 7.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PODD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PODD scores 7/9 vs PFSA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.6% | +9.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +20.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +18.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $48M | $335M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $191,000 | $716M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $48M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.77x | 7.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PODD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PODD five years ago would be worth $6,849 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26 for PFSA. Over the past 12 months, PODD leads with a -39.3% total return vs PFSA's -99.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PODD at -20.5% vs PFSA's -86.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -93.5% | -43.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.7% | -39.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -49.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -31.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +439.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -86.2% | -20.5% |
Risk & Volatility
PODD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PODD is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PFSA's 3.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PODD currently trades 45.2% from its 52-week high vs PFSA's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.08x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $412.50 | $354.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.10 | $148.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.1% | +45.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.3 | 22.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.9M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $339.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% |
PODD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PFSA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
PFSA vs PODD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PFSA or PODD a better buy right now?
Insulet Corporation (PODD) offers the better valuation at 46.
1x trailing P/E (25. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Insulet Corporation (PODD) a "Buy" — based on 50 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PFSA or PODD?
Over the past 5 years, Insulet Corporation (PODD) delivered a total return of -31.
5%, compared to -99. 7% for Profusa, Inc. Common Stock (PFSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PODD returned +439. 0% versus PFSA's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PFSA or PODD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
68β versus Profusa, Inc. Common Stock's 3. 08β — meaning PFSA is approximately 351% more volatile than PODD relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — PFSA or PODD?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Profusa, Inc.
Common Stock grew EPS 9. 7% year-over-year, compared to -39. 8% for Insulet Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PFSA or PODD?
Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
1% net margin versus 0. 0% for Profusa, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PODD leads at 17. 5% versus 0. 0% for PFSA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PODD leads at 71. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PFSA or PODD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is PFSA or PODD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Insulet Corporation (PODD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
68), +439. 0% 10Y return). Profusa, Inc. Common Stock (PFSA) carries a higher beta of 3. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PODD: +439. 0%, PFSA: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PFSA and PODD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PFSA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PODD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.