PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
Household & Personal Products
Market Cap$345.67B
5Y Perf.+27.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PG vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WMT
Walmart Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$1.04T
5Y Perf.+214.6%
PG vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PG | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $345.67B | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $86.72B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12.72B | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 50.3% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 23.2% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 21.4x | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $35.46B | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9.56B | $10.73B |
PG vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PG
WMT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Procter & Gambl… (PG) | 100 | 127.6 | +27.6% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.6 | +214.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PG vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PG leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Walmart Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
The Income Pick
PG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.10, yield 2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 67.8%, current ratio 0.70x
- PEG 3.83 vs WMT's 4.06
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
WMT
Walmart Inc.
The Growth Play
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs PG's 121.5%
- 4.7% revenue growth vs PG's 0.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WMT | 4.7% revenue growth vs PG's 0.3% |
| Value | PG | Lower P/E (21.4x vs 44.7x), PEG 3.83 vs 4.06 |
| Quality / Margins | PG | 14.7% margin vs WMT's 3.3% |
| Stability / Safety | PG | Beta 0.10 vs WMT's 0.12 |
| Dividends | PG | 2.7% yield, 36-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WMT | +33.0% vs PG's -4.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PG | 10.0% ROA vs WMT's 7.9%, ROIC 20.1% vs 14.7% |
PG vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
PG vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPGLAGGINGWMT
WMTWalmart Inc.
1leads
PGThe Procter & Gamble …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs WMTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
PG5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PG6/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PG7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
WMT6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 8.1x PG's $86.7B. PG is the more profitable business, keeping 14.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WMT's 3.3%.
| Metric | PGThe Procter & Gam… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86.7B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21.9B | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12.7B | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15.0B | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.3% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.4% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | +35.1% |
PG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.7x trailing earnings, PG trades at a 52% valuation discount to WMT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PG offers better value at 4.07x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | PGThe Procter & Gam… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $345.7B | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $371.6B | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.72x | 47.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.41x | 44.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.07x | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.95x | 24.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.10x | 1.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.94x | 10.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.61x | 24.94x |
PG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PG delivers a 23.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $22 for WMT. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PG's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs PG's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | PGThe Procter & Gam… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.8% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.0% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.1% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.0% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $25.9B | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9.6B | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35.5B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 487.21x | 11.85x |
PG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,380 for PG. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +33.0% total return vs PG's -4.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.5% vs PG's 1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PGThe Procter & Gam… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.8% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.4% | +33.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.1% | +160.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.8% | +185.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +121.5% | +505.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.0% | +37.5% |
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PG and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PG is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WMT's 0.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs PG's 86.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PGThe Procter & Gam… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.10x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $170.99 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $137.62 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.5% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 58.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.2M | 17.2M |
Evenly matched — PG and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PG and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PG as "Buy" and WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.4% upside for PG (target: $162) vs 5.4% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, PG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.72% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | PGThe Procter & Gam… | WMTWalmart Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $161.88 | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 52 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 36 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.02 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +0.8% |
Evenly matched — PG and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
PG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WMT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallThe Procter & Gamble Company (PG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PG vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PG or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 3% for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (21. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PG or WMT?
On trailing P/E, The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is the cheapest at 22.
7x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, The Procter & Gamble Company is actually cheaper at 21. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Procter & Gamble Company wins at 3. 83x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PG or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +185. 3%, compared to +23. 8% for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +505. 0% versus PG's +121. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PG or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
10β versus Walmart Inc. 's 0. 12β — meaning WMT is approximately 13% more volatile than PG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 68% for The Procter & Gamble Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PG or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 0. 3% for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to 8. 1% for The Procter & Gamble Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PG or WMT?
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
0% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PG leads at 24. 3% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PG leads at 51. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PG or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 83x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) trades at 21. 4x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 23. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PG: 9. 4% to $161. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — PG or WMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is PG or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +505. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +505. 0%, PG: +121. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PG and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PG: 7.4% · WMT: 5.8%)Net Margin>
%
(PG: 14.7% · WMT: 3.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(PG: 22.7x · WMT: 47.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.