Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PGC vs CNOB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
PGC vs CNOB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $819M | $1.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $441M | $676M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $37M | $80M |
| Gross Margin | 58.1% | 49.9% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | 16.7% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $260M | $1.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $92M |
PGC vs CNOB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peapack-Gladstone F… (PGC) | 100 | 246.9 | +146.9% |
| ConnectOne Bancorp,… (CNOB) | 100 | 203.3 | +103.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PGC vs CNOB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PGC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 155.7% 10Y total return vs CNOB's 139.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 39.5%, current ratio 0.13x
- NIM 2.7% vs CNOB's 2.5%
CNOB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth -15.9%
- Beta 1.02, yield 1.9%, current ratio 391.51x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% NII/revenue growth vs PGC's 9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 12.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PGC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs CNOB's 1.02, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs PGC's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.7% vs CNOB's +45.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PGC's 0.5% |
PGC vs CNOB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PGC vs CNOB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNOB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNOB is the larger business by revenue, generating $676M annually — 1.5x PGC's $441M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.9% (CNOB) to 8.5% (PGC).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $441M | $676M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $63M | $122M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $37M | $80M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15M | $102M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.1% | +49.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +16.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +15.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.7% | +53.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PGC and CNOB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.9x trailing earnings, PGC trades at a 1% valuation discount to CNOB's 22.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PGC's 16.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CNOB's 24.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $819M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.92x | 22.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.49x | 10.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.43x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.92x | 24.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.86x | 2.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.24x | 1.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.66x | 16.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PGC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PGC delivers a 5.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNOB. PGC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNOB's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PGC scores 8/9 vs CNOB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.8% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $251M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $92M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $260M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.32x | 0.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PGC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PGC five years ago would be worth $14,665 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,276 for CNOB. Over the past 12 months, PGC leads with a +64.7% total return vs CNOB's +45.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNOB at 29.0% vs PGC's 17.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +66.8% | +26.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +64.7% | +45.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.5% | +114.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.6% | +32.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.7% | +139.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.3% | +29.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PGC and CNOB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PGC is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNOB's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.57 | $32.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.42 | $21.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +99.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.2 | 69.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 116K | 328K |
Analyst Outlook
CNOB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PGC as "Buy" and CNOB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for PGC (target: $49) vs 3.8% for CNOB (target: $34). For income investors, CNOB offers the higher dividend yield at 1.93% vs PGC's 0.43%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.00 | $34.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +0.1% |
CNOB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). PGC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
PGC vs CNOB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PGC or CNOB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.
(CNOB) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 5% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC). Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) offers the better valuation at 21. 9x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PGC or CNOB?
On trailing P/E, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) is the cheapest at 21.
9x versus ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. at 22. 1x. On forward P/E, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PGC or CNOB?
Over the past 5 years, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) delivered a total return of +46.
6%, compared to +32. 8% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PGC returned +155. 7% versus CNOB's +139. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PGC or CNOB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 02β — meaning CNOB is approximately 15% more volatile than PGC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 74% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PGC or CNOB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.
(CNOB) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus 9. 5% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation grew EPS 14. 1% year-over-year, compared to -15. 9% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PGC or CNOB?
ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.
(CNOB) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 3% net margin versus 8. 5% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNOB leads at 18. 6% versus 11. 9% for PGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PGC leads at 58. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PGC or CNOB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.
(CNOB) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 5x for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PGC: 5. 9% to $49. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PGC or CNOB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB) offers the highest yield at 1. 9%, versus 0. 4% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC).
09Is PGC or CNOB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.
(CNOB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 02), 1. 9% yield, +139. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNOB: +139. 7%, PGC: +155. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PGC and CNOB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CNOB pays a dividend while PGC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.