Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PGC logo
PGC
CNOB logo
CNOB
KO logo
KO
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PGC vs CNOB vs KO vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PGC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$819M
5Y Perf.+146.9%
CNOB
ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.65B
5Y Perf.+103.3%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

PGC vs CNOB vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PGC logoPGC
CNOB logoCNOB
KO logoKO
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$819M$1.65B$355.61B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$441M$676M$49.28B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$37M$80M$13.70B$57.05B
Gross Margin58.1%49.9%61.7%60.0%
Operating Margin11.9%16.7%29.3%25.9%
Forward P/E12.5x10.0x25.3x14.4x
Total Debt$260M$1.17B$45.49B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$9M$92M$10.27B$343.34B

PGC vs CNOB vs KO vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PGC
CNOB
KO
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Peapack-Gladstone F… (PGC)100246.9+146.9%
ConnectOne Bancorp,… (CNOB)100203.3+103.3%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PGC vs CNOB vs KO vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. CNOB also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
PGC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

PGC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 9.5%, EPS growth 14.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 39.5%, current ratio 0.13x
  • NIM 2.7% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • Beta 0.89 vs CNOB's 1.02, lower leverage
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
CNOB
ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CNOB is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 1.02, yield 1.9%, current ratio 391.51x
  • 13.4% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
  • Lower P/E (10.0x vs 25.3x)
Best for: defensive
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
  • 27.8% margin vs PGC's 8.5%
  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs CNOB's 1.9%
  • 13.1% ROA vs PGC's 0.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.6%
Best for: income & stability
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs PGC's 155.7%
  • PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCNOB logoCNOB13.4% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueCNOB logoCNOBLower P/E (10.0x vs 25.3x)
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs PGC's 8.5%
Stability / SafetyPGC logoPGCBeta 0.89 vs CNOB's 1.02, lower leverage
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs CNOB's 1.9%
Momentum (1Y)PGC logoPGC+64.7% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs PGC's 0.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.6%

PGC vs CNOB vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PGCPeapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation
FY 2025
Banking Segment
76.6%$217M
Wealth Management Division
23.4%$66M
CNOBConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

PGC vs CNOB vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGCNOB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 635.2x PGC's $441M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PGC's 8.5%.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$441M$676M$49.3B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$63M$122M$15.5B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$37M$80M$13.7B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$15M$102M$12.6B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+58.1%+49.9%+61.7%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.9%+16.7%+29.3%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+8.5%+11.9%+27.8%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.3%+15.1%+25.5%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+32.7%+53.1%+18.2%+16.0%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 41% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$819M$1.6B$355.6B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$2.7B$390.8B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.92x22.14x27.18x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.49x10.04x25.27x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x2.43x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.92x24.17x26.39x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.86x2.72x7.42x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.24x1.05x10.40x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF28.66x16.31x67.15x8.88x
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNOB. PGC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PGC scores 8/9 vs CNOB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.8%+5.5%+41.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.5%+0.6%+13.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.6%+3.5%+15.8%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.8%+1.5%+17.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–98475
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.40x0.74x1.33x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$251M$1.1B$35.2B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$92M$10.3B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$260M$1.2B$45.5B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.32x0.39x10.70x0.74x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,276 for CNOB. Over the past 12 months, PGC leads with a +64.7% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+66.8%+26.9%+20.3%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+64.7%+45.1%+17.2%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.5%+114.8%+47.0%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+46.6%+32.8%+65.6%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+155.7%+139.7%+121.1%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.3%+29.0%+13.7%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CNOB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNOB's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNOB currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.89x1.02x-0.20x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$46.57$32.87$84.04$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$24.42$21.79$65.35$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+99.7%+98.3%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.269.960.659.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded116K328K12.7M7.0M
Evenly matched — CNOB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PGC as "Buy", CNOB as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for PGC (target: $49) vs 3.8% for CNOB (target: $34). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs PGC's 0.43%.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$49.00$34.00$86.13$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts7114861
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%+1.9%+2.5%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises075615
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.20$0.63$2.04$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.7%+0.1%+0.2%+3.9%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PGC vs CNOB vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PGC or CNOB or KO or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

(CNOB) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PGC or CNOB or KO or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PGC or CNOB or KO or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +32. 8% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus KO's +121. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PGC or CNOB or KO or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 02β — meaning CNOB is approximately -610% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PGC or CNOB or KO or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

(CNOB) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -15. 9% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PGC or CNOB or KO or JPM?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 8. 5% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 11. 9% for PGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PGC or CNOB or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PGC: 5. 9% to $49. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PGC or CNOB or KO or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 4% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC).

09

Is PGC or CNOB or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, PGC: +155. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PGC and CNOB and KO and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (PGC (Financial Services) and CNOB (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PGC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CNOB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. CNOB, KO, JPM pay a dividend while PGC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.