PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$113.93B
5Y Perf.+401.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PH vs IR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$30.80B
5Y Perf.+178.9%
PH vs IR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PH | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $113.93B | $30.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20.99B | $7.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.48B | $587M |
| Gross Margin | 37.2% | 38.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.9% | 18.1% |
| Forward P/E | 29.1x | 22.4x |
| Total Debt | $9.64B | $4.78B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $467M | $1.25B |
PH vs IR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PH
IR
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parker-Hannifin Cor… (PH) | 100 | 501.6 | +401.6% |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) | 100 | 278.9 | +178.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PH vs IR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PH leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Ingersoll Rand Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
The Income Pick
PH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 33 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 0.7%
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs IR's 305.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 70.4%, current ratio 1.19x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
The Growth Play
IR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth -29.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.9%
- 5.7% revenue growth vs PH's -0.4%
- Lower P/E (22.4x vs 29.1x)
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | IR | 5.7% revenue growth vs PH's -0.4% |
| Value | IR | Lower P/E (22.4x vs 29.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | PH | 16.6% margin vs IR's 7.5% |
| Stability / Safety | PH | Beta 1.00 vs IR's 1.48 |
| Dividends | PH | 0.7% yield, 33-year raise streak, vs IR's 0.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | PH | +48.2% vs IR's +3.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PH | 11.5% ROA vs IR's 3.2%, ROIC 13.4% vs 7.8% |
PH vs IR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
PH vs IR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPHLAGGINGIR
IRIngersoll Rand Inc.
1leads
PHParker-Hannifin Corpo…
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs IRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
PH4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
IR5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PH6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
PH6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
PH2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
PH2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PH is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.0B annually — 2.7x IR's $7.8B. PH is the more profitable business, keeping 16.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IR's 7.5%. On growth, PH holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | IRIngersoll Rand In… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21.0B | $7.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.1B | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.5B | $587M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.7B | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +38.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.9% | +18.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +7.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.5% | +14.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.6% | +7.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | +6.5% |
PH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
IR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.3x trailing earnings, PH trades at a 39% valuation discount to IR's 54.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IR's 17.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PH's 24.8x.
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | IRIngersoll Rand In… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $113.9B | $30.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $123.1B | $34.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.28x | 54.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.11x | 22.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.39x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.78x | 17.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.74x | 4.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.58x | 3.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.10x | 25.24x |
IR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PH delivers a 24.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $6 for IR. IR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PH's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PH scores 8/9 vs IR's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | IRIngersoll Rand In… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.3% | +5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.5% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.4% | +7.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.8% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.70x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.2B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $467M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9.6B | $4.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.39x | 4.53x |
PH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PH five years ago would be worth $29,479 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,952 for IR. Over the past 12 months, PH leads with a +48.2% total return vs IR's +3.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PH at 40.2% vs IR's 10.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | IRIngersoll Rand In… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.2% | -1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +48.2% | +3.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +175.4% | +33.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +194.8% | +59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +741.1% | +305.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.2% | +10.2% |
PH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PH is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IR's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PH currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs IR's 77.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | IRIngersoll Rand In… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1034.96 | $100.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $608.31 | $72.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.2% | +77.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.9 | 36.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 710K | 3.2M |
PH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
PH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PH as "Buy" and IR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.5% upside for IR (target: $100) vs 15.4% for PH (target: $1042). For income investors, PH offers the higher dividend yield at 0.73% vs IR's 0.10%.
| Metric | PHParker-Hannifin C… | IRIngersoll Rand In… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1042.08 | $99.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 38 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 33 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $6.61 | $0.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +3.3% |
PH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
PH leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallParker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PH vs IR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PH or IR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ingersoll Rand Inc.
(IR) is the stronger pick with 5. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 4% for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) offers the better valuation at 33. 3x trailing P/E (29. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PH or IR?
On trailing P/E, Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is the cheapest at 33.
3x versus Ingersoll Rand Inc. at 54. 2x. On forward P/E, Ingersoll Rand Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PH or IR?
Over the past 5 years, Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) delivered a total return of +194.
8%, compared to +59. 5% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PH returned +741. 1% versus IR's +305. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PH or IR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
00β versus Ingersoll Rand Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning IR is approximately 49% more volatile than PH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 70% for Parker-Hannifin Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PH or IR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ingersoll Rand Inc.
(IR) is pulling ahead at 5. 7% versus -0. 4% for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Parker-Hannifin Corporation grew EPS 24. 2% year-over-year, compared to -29. 6% for Ingersoll Rand Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IR leads at 8. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PH or IR?
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
8% net margin versus 7. 6% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PH leads at 20. 5% versus 18. 5% for IR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IR leads at 38. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PH or IR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ingersoll Rand Inc.
(IR) trades at 22. 4x forward P/E versus 29. 1x for Parker-Hannifin Corporation — 6. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IR: 26. 5% to $99. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PH or IR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) offers the highest yield at 0. 7%, versus 0. 1% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR).
09Is PH or IR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
00), 0. 7% yield, +741. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PH: +741. 1%, IR: +305. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PH and IR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
PH pays a dividend while IR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PH: 10.6% · IR: 7.6%)Net Margin>
%
(PH: 16.6% · IR: 7.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(PH: 33.3x · IR: 54.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.