PHG vs EW

For growth investors, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) is the stronger pick with 11.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 0% for Koninklijke Philips N. V. (PHG). Koninklijke Philips N. V. (PHG) offers the better valuation at 24. 9x trailing P/E (17. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Koninklijke Philips N.

V. (PHG) is the cheapest at 24. 9x versus Edwards Lifesciences Corporation at 45. 5x. On forward P/E, Koninklijke Philips N. V. is actually cheaper at 17. 6x.

Over the past 5 years, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) delivered a total return of -9.

3%, compared to -41. 9% for Koninklijke Philips N. V. (PHG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EW returned +136. 1% versus PHG's +47. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

65β versus Koninklijke Philips N. V. 's 1. 12β — meaning PHG is approximately 71% more volatile than EW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 74% for Koninklijke Philips N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) is pulling ahead at 11.

5% versus -1. 0% for Koninklijke Philips N. V. (PHG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Koninklijke Philips N. V. grew EPS 224. 0% year-over-year, compared to -73. 7% for Edwards Lifesciences Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, EW leads at 4. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) is the more profitable company, earning 17.

7% net margin versus 5. 0% for Koninklijke Philips N. V. — meaning it keeps 17. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EW leads at 27. 0% versus 8. 0% for PHG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EW leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Koninklijke Philips N.

V. (PHG) trades at 17. 6x forward P/E versus 27. 7x for Edwards Lifesciences Corporation — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

In this comparison, PHG (1.

5% yield) pays a dividend. EW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Koninklijke Philips N.

V. (PHG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PHG: +47. 9%, EW: +136. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

PHG pays a dividend while EW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.