PHI vs TEF

For growth investors, PLDT Inc.

(PHI) is the stronger pick with 3. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 6% for Telefónica, S. A. (TEF). PLDT Inc. (PHI) offers the better valuation at 8. 8x trailing P/E (0. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Telefónica, S. A. (TEF) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, PLDT Inc.

is actually cheaper at 0. 1x.

Over the past 5 years, Telefónica, S.

A. (TEF) delivered a total return of +24. 3%, compared to +11. 1% for PLDT Inc. (PHI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PHI returned +6. 9% versus TEF's -17. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Telefónica, S.

A. (TEF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 16β versus PLDT Inc. 's 0. 21β — meaning PHI is approximately 33% more volatile than TEF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Telefónica, S. A. (TEF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 198% versus 3% for PLDT Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), PLDT Inc.

(PHI) is pulling ahead at 3. 0% versus 1. 6% for Telefónica, S. A. (TEF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Telefónica, S. A. grew EPS 71. 8% year-over-year, compared to -5. 1% for PLDT Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PHI leads at 3. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

PLDT Inc.

(PHI) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 7% net margin versus -0. 1% for Telefónica, S. A. — meaning it keeps 13. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PHI leads at 24. 9% versus 5. 8% for TEF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TEF leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, PLDT Inc.

(PHI) trades at 0. 1x forward P/E versus 12. 5x for Telefónica, S. A. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Telefónica, S. A. (TEF) offers the highest yield at 8. 5%, versus 7. 8% for PLDT Inc. (PHI).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Telefónica, S.

A. (TEF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 16), 8. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TEF: -17. 7%, PHI: +6. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PHI is a small-cap deep-value stock; TEF is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.