Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PI vs COHU vs FORM vs ONTO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PI
Impinj, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.61B
5Y Perf.+485.4%
COHU
Cohu, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.23B
5Y Perf.+215.3%
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.28B
5Y Perf.+474.8%
ONTO
Onto Innovation Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$13.63B
5Y Perf.+781.7%

PI vs COHU vs FORM vs ONTO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PI logoPI
COHU logoCOHU
FORM logoFORM
ONTO logoONTO
IndustryCommunication EquipmentSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$4.61B$2.23B$11.28B$13.63B
Revenue (TTM)$361M$481M$840M$1.03B
Net Income (TTM)$-28M$-56M$68M$106M
Gross Margin52.3%25.7%42.1%48.8%
Operating Margin-1.8%-10.6%12.7%10.0%
Forward P/E80.4x89.2x66.5x38.7x
Total Debt$327M$359M$45M$17M
Cash & Equiv.$48M$227M$103M$346M

PI vs COHU vs FORM vs ONTOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PI
COHU
FORM
ONTO
StockMay 20May 26Return
Impinj, Inc. (PI)100585.4+485.4%
Cohu, Inc. (COHU)100315.3+215.3%
FormFactor, Inc. (FORM)100574.8+474.8%
Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO)100881.7+781.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PI vs COHU vs FORM vs ONTO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FORM leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. Onto Innovation Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. COHU also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PI
Impinj, Inc.
The Secondary Option

PI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
COHU
Cohu, Inc.
The Growth Play

COHU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 12.7%, EPS growth -6.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.7%
  • 12.7% revenue growth vs PI's -1.4%
Best for: growth exposure
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.
The Income Pick

FORM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 2.02
  • 19.5% 10Y total return vs ONTO's 14.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.02, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 4.50x
  • Beta 2.02, current ratio 4.50x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
ONTO
Onto Innovation Inc.
The Value Play

ONTO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (38.7x vs 66.5x)
  • 10.3% margin vs COHU's -11.5%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCOHU logoCOHU12.7% revenue growth vs PI's -1.4%
ValueONTO logoONTOLower P/E (38.7x vs 66.5x)
Quality / MarginsONTO logoONTO10.3% margin vs COHU's -11.5%
Stability / SafetyFORM logoFORMBeta 2.02 vs ONTO's 2.66
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FORM logoFORM+387.8% vs PI's +54.9%
Efficiency (ROA)FORM logoFORM5.6% ROA vs PI's -5.3%, ROIC 5.4% vs -0.1%

PI vs COHU vs FORM vs ONTO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PIImpinj, Inc.
FY 2025
Endpoint I Cs
83.0%$300M
Systems
17.0%$61M
COHUCohu, Inc.
FY 2014
Semiconductor Equipment
95.0%$317M
Microwave Communications Equipment
5.0%$17M
FORMFormFactor, Inc.
FY 2025
Foundry & Logic Product Group
47.1%$370M
DRAM Product Group
31.5%$247M
Systems Product Group
18.7%$147M
Flash Product Group
2.6%$21M
ONTOOnto Innovation Inc.
FY 2025
Systems And Software Revenue
84.3%$848M
Parts Revenue
8.4%$84M
Service Revenue
7.3%$73M

PI vs COHU vs FORM vs ONTO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFORMLAGGINGCOHU

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FORM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ONTO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 2.9x PI's $361M. ONTO is the more profitable business, keeping 10.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COHU's -11.5%. On growth, FORM holds the edge at +32.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPI logoPIImpinj, Inc.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.FORM logoFORMFormFactor, Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$361M$481M$840M$1.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$9M-$11M$152M$158M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$28M-$56M$68M$106M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$61M$32M-$5M$239M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+52.3%+25.7%+42.1%+48.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-1.8%-10.6%+12.7%+10.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.7%-11.5%+8.1%+10.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.9%+6.6%-0.6%+23.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.0%+29.3%+32.0%+9.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-176.7%+60.6%+2.2%-48.5%
FORM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ONTO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 98.6x trailing earnings, ONTO trades at a 53% valuation discount to FORM's 209.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ONTO's 68.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PI's 341.7x.

MetricPI logoPIImpinj, Inc.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.FORM logoFORMFormFactor, Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…
Market CapShares × price$4.6B$2.2B$11.3B$13.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.9B$2.4B$11.2B$13.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-409.00x-29.86x209.68x98.57x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.80.43x89.21x66.48x38.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.85x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple341.74x100.94x68.79x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue12.77x4.93x14.37x13.56x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share21.18x2.82x10.94x6.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF100.45x207.83x960.69x45.47x
ONTO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ONTO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FORM delivers a 6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-14 for PI. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PI's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PI scores 6/9 vs ONTO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricPI logoPIImpinj, Inc.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.FORM logoFORMFormFactor, Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-13.9%-6.8%+6.7%+5.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.3%-4.9%+5.6%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.1%-5.7%+5.4%+5.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.3%-5.9%+6.1%+6.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96444
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.56x0.46x0.04x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$279M$132M-$58M-$329M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$48M$227M$103M$346M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$327M$359M$45M$17M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-7.66x-168.82x252.69x
ONTO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FORM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ONTO five years ago would be worth $41,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,218 for COHU. Over the past 12 months, FORM leads with a +387.8% total return vs PI's +54.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FORM at 72.9% vs COHU's 12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPI logoPIImpinj, Inc.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.FORM logoFORMFormFactor, Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-15.8%+92.9%+144.4%+65.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+54.9%+199.7%+387.8%+118.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+59.9%+40.7%+417.3%+218.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+193.4%+22.2%+273.9%+312.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+742.1%+330.2%+1952.2%+1431.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+16.9%+12.1%+72.9%+47.1%
FORM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — COHU and FORM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FORM is the less volatile stock with a 2.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ONTO's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COHU currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs PI's 61.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPI logoPIImpinj, Inc.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.FORM logoFORMFormFactor, Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.12x2.13x2.02x2.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$247.06$50.68$159.09$315.86
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$87.36$15.34$26.08$85.88
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+61.3%+93.7%+90.9%+86.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10077.675.566.561.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded550K953K1.6M832K
Evenly matched — COHU and FORM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: PI as "Buy", COHU as "Buy", FORM as "Hold", ONTO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.9% upside for PI (target: $180) vs -14.7% for FORM (target: $123).

MetricPI logoPIImpinj, Inc.COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.FORM logoFORMFormFactor, Inc.ONTO logoONTOOnto Innovation I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$180.00$49.75$123.38$308.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts22141911
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.3%+0.2%+0.6%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

FORM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ONTO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallFormFactor, Inc. (FORM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PI vs COHU vs FORM vs ONTO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PI or COHU or FORM or ONTO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cohu, Inc.

(COHU) is the stronger pick with 12. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Impinj, Inc. (PI). Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) offers the better valuation at 98. 6x trailing P/E (38. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Impinj, Inc. (PI) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PI or COHU or FORM or ONTO?

On trailing P/E, Onto Innovation Inc.

(ONTO) is the cheapest at 98. 6x versus FormFactor, Inc. at 209. 7x. On forward P/E, Onto Innovation Inc. is actually cheaper at 38. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PI or COHU or FORM or ONTO?

Over the past 5 years, Onto Innovation Inc.

(ONTO) delivered a total return of +312. 6%, compared to +22. 2% for Cohu, Inc. (COHU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FORM returned +1952% versus COHU's +330. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PI or COHU or FORM or ONTO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FormFactor, Inc.

(FORM) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 02β versus Onto Innovation Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning ONTO is approximately 31% more volatile than FORM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 156% for Impinj, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PI or COHU or FORM or ONTO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cohu, Inc.

(COHU) is pulling ahead at 12. 7% versus -1. 4% for Impinj, Inc. (PI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cohu, Inc. grew EPS -6. 7% year-over-year, compared to -126. 6% for Impinj, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PI leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PI or COHU or FORM or ONTO?

Onto Innovation Inc.

(ONTO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ONTO leads at 13. 2% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PI leads at 52. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PI or COHU or FORM or ONTO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Onto Innovation Inc.

(ONTO) trades at 38. 7x forward P/E versus 89. 2x for Cohu, Inc. — 50. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PI: 18. 9% to $180. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PI or COHU or FORM or ONTO?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is PI or COHU or FORM or ONTO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, FormFactor, Inc.

(FORM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1952% 10Y return). Cohu, Inc. (COHU) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FORM: +1952%, COHU: +330. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PI and COHU and FORM and ONTO?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 31%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

COHU

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FORM

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ONTO

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PI and COHU and FORM and ONTO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PI: -0.0% · COHU: 29.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.