Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PJT vs LAZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
PJT vs LAZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $3.67B | $4.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.71B | $3.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $187M | $237M |
| Gross Margin | 32.4% | 31.8% |
| Operating Margin | 21.2% | 13.0% |
| Forward P/E | 20.4x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $414M | $2.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $539M | $1.50B |
PJT vs LAZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PJT Partners Inc. (PJT) | 100 | 277.8 | +177.8% |
| Lazard Ltd (LAZ) | 100 | 167.9 | +67.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PJT vs LAZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PJT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 0.6%
- Rev growth 14.8%, EPS growth 35.8%
- 6.3% 10Y total return vs LAZ's 94.5%
LAZ is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.79, yield 3.9%, current ratio 29.35x
- 3.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PJT's 0.6%
- +16.3% vs PJT's +7.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.8% NII/revenue growth vs LAZ's 3.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs LAZ's 0.2% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs LAZ's 1.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PJT's 0.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.3% vs PJT's +7.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs LAZ's 0.2% |
PJT vs LAZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PJT vs LAZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PJT leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 1.9x PJT's $1.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 10.5% (PJT) to 7.4% (LAZ).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $412M | $384M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $187M | $237M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $614M | $519M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | +31.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +13.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.0% | +15.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | -43.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PJT and LAZ each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.8x trailing earnings, LAZ trades at a 9% valuation discount to PJT's 22.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PJT's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LAZ's 11.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.7B | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.5B | $5.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.74x | 20.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.35x | 14.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.61x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.00x | 11.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.14x | 1.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.31x | 4.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.64x | 8.38x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PJT leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LAZ delivers a 26.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $20 for PJT. PJT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LAZ's 2.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PJT scores 7/9 vs LAZ's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.1% | +26.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.1% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.3% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.2% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 2.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$125M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $539M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $414M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PJT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PJT five years ago would be worth $22,227 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,940 for LAZ. Over the past 12 months, LAZ leads with a +16.3% total return vs PJT's +7.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PJT at 35.6% vs LAZ's 21.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.2% | -8.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.3% | +16.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.1% | +76.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.3% | +19.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +632.1% | +94.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.6% | +21.0% |
Risk & Volatility
PJT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PJT is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LAZ's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $195.62 | $58.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $127.73 | $38.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.7% | +76.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 41.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 366K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
LAZ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PJT as "Hold" and LAZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.9% upside for LAZ (target: $47) vs 4.4% for PJT (target: $159). For income investors, LAZ offers the higher dividend yield at 3.89% vs PJT's 0.56%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $158.67 | $47.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.86 | $1.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | +2.1% |
PJT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LAZ leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
PJT vs LAZ: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PJT or LAZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PJT Partners Inc.
(PJT) is the stronger pick with 14. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for Lazard Ltd (LAZ). Lazard Ltd (LAZ) offers the better valuation at 20. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lazard Ltd (LAZ) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PJT or LAZ?
On trailing P/E, Lazard Ltd (LAZ) is the cheapest at 20.
8x versus PJT Partners Inc. at 22. 7x. On forward P/E, Lazard Ltd is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PJT or LAZ?
Over the past 5 years, PJT Partners Inc.
(PJT) delivered a total return of +122. 3%, compared to +19. 4% for Lazard Ltd (LAZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PJT returned +632. 1% versus LAZ's +94. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PJT or LAZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PJT Partners Inc.
(PJT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Lazard Ltd's 1. 79β — meaning LAZ is approximately 63% more volatile than PJT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PJT Partners Inc. (PJT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 3% for Lazard Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PJT or LAZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PJT Partners Inc.
(PJT) is pulling ahead at 14. 8% versus 3. 2% for Lazard Ltd (LAZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PJT Partners Inc. grew EPS 35. 8% year-over-year, compared to -19. 0% for Lazard Ltd. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PJT or LAZ?
PJT Partners Inc.
(PJT) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 5% net margin versus 7. 4% for Lazard Ltd — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PJT leads at 21. 2% versus 13. 0% for LAZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PJT leads at 32. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PJT or LAZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Lazard Ltd (LAZ) trades at 14.
1x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for PJT Partners Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LAZ: 4. 9% to $47. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — PJT or LAZ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Lazard Ltd (LAZ) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 0. 6% for PJT Partners Inc. (PJT).
09Is PJT or LAZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PJT Partners Inc.
(PJT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), 0. 6% yield, +632. 1% 10Y return). Lazard Ltd (LAZ) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PJT: +632. 1%, LAZ: +94. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PJT and LAZ?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PJT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAZ is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.