Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PKBK logo
PKBK
FUNC logo
FUNC
JPM logo
JPM
FIS logo
FIS
CZWI logo
CZWI
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PKBK vs FUNC vs JPM vs FIS vs CZWI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PKBK
Parke Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$383M
5Y Perf.+137.2%
FUNC
First United Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$272M
5Y Perf.+213.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+212.8%

PKBK vs FUNC vs JPM vs FIS vs CZWI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PKBK logoPKBK
FUNC logoFUNC
JPM logoJPM
FIS logoFIS
CZWI logoCZWI
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - DiversifiedInformation Technology ServicesBanks - Regional
Market Cap$383M$272M$896.00B$20.26B$207M
Revenue (TTM)$146M$120M$280.33B$11.66B$90M
Net Income (TTM)$38M$25M$57.05B$2.67B$14M
Gross Margin53.3%70.3%60.0%37.6%54.7%
Operating Margin34.2%27.2%25.9%17.9%7.0%
Forward P/E535.7x9.7x14.4x6.2x11.8x
Total Debt$143M$115M$942.38B$4.01B$52M
Cash & Equiv.$157M$132M$343.34B$599M$119M

PKBK vs FUNC vs JPM vs FIS vs CZWILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PKBK
FUNC
JPM
FIS
CZWI
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Parke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK)100237.2+137.2%
First United Corpor… (FUNC)100313.9+213.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100312.8+212.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PKBK vs FUNC vs JPM vs FIS vs CZWI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PKBK and FIS are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. CZWI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PKBK
Parke Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

PKBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.

  • Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth 39.2%
  • NIM 3.4% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • 12.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
  • 25.9% margin vs CZWI's 16.0%
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
FUNC
First United Corporation
The Financial Play

FUNC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs FUNC's 361.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
  • PEG 0.26 vs CZWI's 2.32
  • Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • Beta 0.50 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPKBK logoPKBK12.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
Quality / MarginsPKBK logoPKBK25.9% margin vs CZWI's 16.0%
Stability / SafetyCZWI logoCZWIBeta 0.50 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
Momentum (1Y)PKBK logoPKBK+67.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.0%

PKBK vs FUNC vs JPM vs FIS vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
PKBKParke Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FUNCFirst United Corporation
FY 2025
Trust Department
53.3%$10M
Debit Card Income
22.0%$4M
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
12.2%$2M
Brokerage Commissions
7.8%$1M
Other Service Charges
4.6%$845,000
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M

PKBK vs FUNC vs JPM vs FIS vs CZWI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPKBKLAGGINGCZWI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PKBK leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3112.4x CZWI's $90M. PKBK is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.

MetricPKBK logoPKBKParke Bancorp, In…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$146M$120M$280.3B$11.7B$90M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$50M$35M$81.4B$4.1B$9M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$38M$25M$57.0B$2.7B$14M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$39M$16M$100.9B$2.8B$11M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+53.3%+70.3%+60.0%+37.6%+54.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+34.2%+27.2%+25.9%+17.9%+7.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+25.9%+20.5%+20.4%+22.9%+16.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+26.7%+13.1%+36.0%+23.9%+12.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+52.5%+20.2%+16.0%+30.6%+63.0%
PKBK leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.2x trailing earnings, PKBK trades at a 81% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 0.85x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPKBK logoPKBKParke Bancorp, In…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Market CapShares × price$383M$272M$896.0B$20.3B$207M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$370M$255M$1.50T$23.7B$140M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.17x11.11x16.00x52.27x14.70x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.535.67x9.66x14.40x6.24x11.79x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.72x0.85x0.90x2.14x2.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.34x7.85x18.36x6.50x15.69x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.62x2.28x3.20x1.90x2.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.18x1.34x2.47x1.46x1.11x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.84x17.67x8.88x7.21x19.90x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — PKBK and FIS and CZWI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. CZWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PKBK scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPKBK logoPKBKParke Bancorp, In…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.0%+12.6%+15.9%+18.4%+7.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.7%+1.2%+1.3%+7.5%+0.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.8%+7.1%+4.5%+6.0%+2.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.6%+9.8%+8.9%+6.6%+0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–987566
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.44x0.56x2.60x0.29x0.28x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$13M-$17M$599.0B$3.4B-$67M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$157M$132M$343.3B$599M$119M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$143M$115M$942.4B$4.0B$52M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.75x0.99x0.74x21.16x0.16x
Evenly matched — PKBK and FIS and CZWI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FUNC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $24,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, PKBK leads with a +67.1% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 43.0% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPKBK logoPKBKParke Bancorp, In…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+34.0%+14.3%-0.5%-38.9%+24.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+67.1%+44.4%+21.8%-49.4%+52.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+104.0%+192.2%+138.2%-18.9%+153.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+75.1%+141.9%+118.2%-67.3%+69.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+286.6%+361.3%+465.8%-25.6%+149.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.8%+43.0%+33.6%-6.8%+36.4%
FUNC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PKBK and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PKBK currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPKBK logoPKBKParke Bancorp, In…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.63x0.67x0.94x0.61x0.50x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$32.24$42.35$337.25$82.74$22.62
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$18.78$28.00$262.71$37.91$12.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.7%+98.9%+95.1%+47.4%+94.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.071.659.130.851.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded90K13K7.0M5.6M41K
Evenly matched — PKBK and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FUNC as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -40.3% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs CZWI's 1.73%.

MetricPKBK logoPKBKParke Bancorp, In…FUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$25.00$339.75$62.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts161372
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.2%+2.2%+1.9%+4.2%+1.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises071516
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.71$0.92$5.95$1.63$0.37
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.7%0.0%+3.9%+7.0%+3.0%
Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

PKBK leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallParke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PKBK vs FUNC vs JPM vs FIS vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PKBK or FUNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Parke Bancorp, Inc.

(PKBK) is the stronger pick with 12. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Parke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (535. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PKBK or FUNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI?

On trailing P/E, Parke Bancorp, Inc.

(PKBK) is the cheapest at 10. 2x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Parke Bancorp, Inc. 's 90. 45x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PKBK or FUNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI?

Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +141.

9%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PKBK or FUNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 90% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PKBK or FUNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Parke Bancorp, Inc.

(PKBK) is pulling ahead at 12. 9% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Parke Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 39. 2% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PKBK or FUNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI?

Parke Bancorp, Inc.

(PKBK) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 9% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PKBK leads at 34. 2% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PKBK or FUNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Parke Bancorp, Inc. 's 90. 45x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 535. 7x for Parke Bancorp, Inc. — 529. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PKBK or FUNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).

09

Is PKBK or FUNC or JPM or FIS or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 7% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +149. 0%, FIS: -25. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PKBK and FUNC and JPM and FIS and CZWI?

These companies operate in different sectors (PKBK (Financial Services) and FUNC (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and CZWI (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PKBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.