PKE vs TPC vs PWR vs HAYW

For growth investors, Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) is the stronger pick with 28.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 7% for Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW). Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (17. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Park Aerospace Corp. (PKE) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Hayward Holdings, Inc.

(HAYW) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus Park Aerospace Corp. at 115. 2x. On forward P/E, Hayward Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hayward Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 12x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Quanta Services, Inc.

(PWR) delivered a total return of +651. 1%, compared to -37. 0% for Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +31. 4% versus HAYW's -13. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hayward Holdings, Inc.

(HAYW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 14β versus Tutor Perini Corporation's 1. 68β — meaning TPC is approximately 47% more volatile than HAYW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Park Aerospace Corp. (PKE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 37% for Tutor Perini Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) is pulling ahead at 28.

1% versus 6. 7% for Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tutor Perini Corporation grew EPS 148. 2% year-over-year, compared to -21. 6% for Park Aerospace Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PWR leads at 18. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Hayward Holdings, Inc.

(HAYW) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 5% net margin versus 1. 5% for Tutor Perini Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HAYW leads at 21. 1% versus 4. 2% for TPC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HAYW leads at 45. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) trades at 17. 2x forward P/E versus 57. 4x for Quanta Services, Inc. — 40. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HAYW: 6. 7% to $15. 75.

In this comparison, PKE (1.

5% yield) pays a dividend. TPC, PWR, HAYW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Park Aerospace Corp.

(PKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 23), 1. 5% yield, +209. 5% 10Y return). Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PKE: +209. 5%, TPC: +327. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PKE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPC is a small-cap high-growth stock; PWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HAYW is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PKE pays a dividend while TPC, PWR, HAYW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.