PKOH vs NNBR

For growth investors, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.

(PKOH) is the stronger pick with -3. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 1% for NN, Inc. (NNBR). Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.

is actually cheaper at 10. 0x.

Over the past 5 years, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.

(PKOH) delivered a total return of -12. 1%, compared to -63. 4% for NN, Inc. (NNBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PKOH returned +45. 4% versus NNBR's -75. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.

(PKOH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 38β versus NN, Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning NNBR is approximately 48% more volatile than PKOH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NN, Inc. (NNBR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 144% versus 174% for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.

(PKOH) is pulling ahead at -3. 4% versus -9. 1% for NN, Inc. (NNBR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NN, Inc. grew EPS 3. 6% year-over-year, compared to -46. 7% for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PKOH leads at 2. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.

(PKOH) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 5% net margin versus -8. 1% for NN, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PKOH leads at 5. 1% versus -4. 3% for NNBR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PKOH leads at 17. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.

(PKOH) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 43. 6x for NN, Inc. — 33. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

In this comparison, PKOH (1.

8% yield) pays a dividend. NNBR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.

(PKOH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 8% yield). NN, Inc. (NNBR) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PKOH: +45. 4%, NNBR: -75. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

PKOH pays a dividend while NNBR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.