Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PLAB vs UCTT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
PLAB vs UCTT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.90B | $3.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $862M | $2.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $136M | $-194M |
| Gross Margin | 35.1% | 15.6% |
| Operating Margin | 24.5% | -5.3% |
| Forward P/E | 22.3x | 34.4x |
| Total Debt | $24K | $810M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $492M | $312M |
PLAB vs UCTT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Photronics, Inc. (PLAB) | 100 | 420.0 | +320.0% |
| Ultra Clean Holding… (UCTT) | 100 | 385.4 | +285.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLAB vs UCTT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLAB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.88
- Rev growth -2.0%, EPS growth 9.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.88, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 5.37x
UCTT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 13.9% 10Y total return vs PLAB's 390.1%
- +312.7% vs PLAB's +165.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.0% revenue growth vs UCTT's -2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.3x vs 34.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.8% margin vs UCTT's -9.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.88 vs UCTT's 3.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +312.7% vs PLAB's +165.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.2% ROA vs UCTT's -11.0%, ROIC 15.5% vs 2.6% |
PLAB vs UCTT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PLAB vs UCTT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLAB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UCTT is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 2.4x PLAB's $862M. PLAB is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UCTT's -9.4%. On growth, PLAB holds the edge at +6.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $862M | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $287M | -$52M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $136M | -$194M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $66M | -$44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.1% | +15.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | -5.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | -9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | -2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.8% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
PLAB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PLAB's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UCTT's 34.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $4.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.09x | -19.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.32x | 34.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.64x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.43x | 34.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.42x | 1.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.89x | 4.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 48.65x | 247.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLAB leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PLAB delivers a 8.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-25 for UCTT. PLAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UCTT's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLAB scores 6/9 vs UCTT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.3% | -25.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.2% | -11.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.5% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.1% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$492M | $499M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $492M | $312M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24,000 | $810M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3777.78x | -5.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PLAB and UCTT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLAB five years ago would be worth $38,152 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,935 for UCTT. Over the past 12 months, UCTT leads with a +312.7% total return vs PLAB's +165.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLAB at 50.3% vs UCTT's 42.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +50.7% | +192.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +165.2% | +312.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +239.4% | +187.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +281.5% | +59.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +390.1% | +1385.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +50.3% | +42.2% |
Risk & Volatility
PLAB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PLAB is the less volatile stock with a 2.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UCTT's 3.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLAB currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs UCTT's 91.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.88x | 3.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.00 | $87.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.59 | $18.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.5 | 62.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 865K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
UCTT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PLAB as "Buy" and UCTT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.4% upside for UCTT (target: $85) vs -2.0% for PLAB (target: $49).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.33 | $85.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.4% | +0.1% |
PLAB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). UCTT leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
PLAB vs UCTT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLAB or UCTT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Photronics, Inc.
(PLAB) is the stronger pick with -2. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 1% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (UCTT). Photronics, Inc. (PLAB) offers the better valuation at 22. 1x trailing P/E (22. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Photronics, Inc. (PLAB) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLAB or UCTT?
On forward P/E, Photronics, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 22. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLAB or UCTT?
Over the past 5 years, Photronics, Inc.
(PLAB) delivered a total return of +281. 5%, compared to +59. 4% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (UCTT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UCTT returned +1385% versus PLAB's +390. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLAB or UCTT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Photronics, Inc.
(PLAB) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 88β versus Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 19β — meaning UCTT is approximately 11% more volatile than PLAB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Photronics, Inc. (PLAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 103% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLAB or UCTT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Photronics, Inc.
(PLAB) is pulling ahead at -2. 0% versus -2. 1% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (UCTT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Photronics, Inc. grew EPS 9. 1% year-over-year, compared to -869. 2% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLAB leads at 1. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLAB or UCTT?
Photronics, Inc.
(PLAB) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -8. 8% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLAB leads at 24. 5% versus 2. 1% for UCTT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLAB leads at 35. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLAB or UCTT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Photronics, Inc.
(PLAB) trades at 22. 3x forward P/E versus 34. 4x for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. — 12. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UCTT: 6. 4% to $85. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLAB or UCTT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PLAB or UCTT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.
(UCTT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1385% 10Y return). Photronics, Inc. (PLAB) carries a higher beta of 2. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UCTT: +1385%, PLAB: +390. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLAB and UCTT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.