Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PLAG vs AMTX vs GEVO vs PLUG vs BE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Chemicals - Specialty
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
PLAG vs AMTX vs GEVO vs PLUG vs BE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Chemicals - Specialty | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $14M | $213M | $493M | $4.36B | $62.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $209M | $174M | $710M | $2.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $-74M | $-11M | $-1.63B | $6M |
| Gross Margin | 6.3% | 3.4% | 23.4% | 99.8% | 31.1% |
| Operating Margin | -206.6% | -13.4% | -4.6% | 38.1% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 123.6x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $318M | $168M | $997M | $2.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $194K | $5M | $1M | $1M | $2.45B |
PLAG vs AMTX vs GEVO vs PLUG vs BE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Planet Green Holdin… (PLAG) | 100 | 8.2 | -91.8% |
| Aemetis, Inc. (AMTX) | 100 | 390.0 | +290.0% |
| Gevo, Inc. (GEVO) | 100 | 157.4 | +57.4% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 74.3 | -25.7% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 3220.9 | +3120.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLAG vs AMTX vs GEVO vs PLUG vs BE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLAG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.36
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 17.6%, current ratio 0.54x
- Beta 1.36, current ratio 0.54x
- Better valuation composite
AMTX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GEVO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.5%, EPS growth 58.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 415.1%
- 8.5% revenue growth vs PLAG's -61.9%
Among these 5 stocks, PLUG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 9.3% 10Y total return vs PLUG's 62.2%
- 0.2% margin vs PLAG's -430.8%
- +14.6% vs PLAG's +67.0%
- 0.2% ROA vs PLAG's -138.8%, ROIC 4.1% vs -27.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.5% revenue growth vs PLAG's -61.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.2% margin vs PLAG's -430.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.36 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.6% vs PLAG's +67.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs PLAG's -138.8%, ROIC 4.1% vs -27.3% |
PLAG vs AMTX vs GEVO vs PLUG vs BE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PLAG vs AMTX vs GEVO vs PLUG vs BE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories
GEVO leads 1 • PLAG leads 1 • AMTX leads 0 • PLUG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 618.4x PLAG's $4M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.2% (BE) to -4.3% (PLAG). On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $209M | $174M | $710M | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$21M | $18M | -$1.5B | $240M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | -$74M | -$11M | -$1.6B | $6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$347M | -$38M | -$35M | -$2M | $233M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +3.4% | +23.4% | +99.8% | +31.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -13.4% | -4.6% | +38.1% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | -35.4% | -6.6% | -2.3% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -87.6% | -18.2% | -19.9% | -0.3% | +9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -57.4% | +27.4% | +47.5% | +17.6% | +130.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -193.8% | +29.8% | +3.8% | +95.9% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
GEVO leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GEVO's 102.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 508.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $213M | $493M | $4.4B | $62.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16M | $526M | $659M | $5.4B | $62.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.90x | -2.44x | -14.50x | — | -699.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 123.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 102.12x | — | 508.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.08x | 1.02x | 3.07x | 6.14x | 30.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | — | 1.01x | — | 78.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.18x | — | — | — | 1087.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLAG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BE delivers a 0.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. PLAG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLAG scores 6/9 vs BE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -47.1% | — | -2.4% | -124.4% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -138.8% | -29.3% | -1.7% | -64.3% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.3% | -70.3% | -2.8% | +10.9% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -42.2% | -19.0% | -3.1% | +18.6% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | — | 0.36x | 19.75x | 3.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $313M | $166M | $996M | $538M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $193,919 | $5M | $1M | $1M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $318M | $168M | $997M | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -94.47x | -0.27x | -0.04x | -36.18x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $111,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,038 for PLAG. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1464.7% total return vs PLAG's +67.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.0% vs PLUG's -30.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.0% | +96.2% | -1.5% | +40.4% | +162.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +67.0% | +140.0% | +88.0% | +303.6% | +1464.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.4% | +37.4% | +65.0% | -66.3% | +1425.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.6% | -76.1% | -65.2% | -86.4% | +1013.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | +31.1% | -98.6% | +62.2% | +934.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.4% | +11.2% | +18.2% | -30.4% | +148.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PLAG and BE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PLAG is the less volatile stock with a 1.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BE currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs PLAG's 42.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 1.46x | 1.64x | 2.57x | 3.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.49 | $3.80 | $2.97 | $4.58 | $302.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.47 | $1.22 | $1.01 | $0.69 | $16.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.8% | +82.1% | +68.4% | +68.3% | +85.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.1 | 58.2 | 53.5 | 63.3 | 72.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 104K | 1.8M | 4.5M | 76.5M | 10.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMTX as "Buy", GEVO as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", BE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 72.4% upside for GEVO (target: $4) vs -43.9% for AMTX (target: $2).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1.75 | $3.50 | $3.91 | $187.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 14 | 38 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). GEVO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PLAG vs AMTX vs GEVO vs PLUG vs BE: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLAG or AMTX or GEVO or PLUG or BE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gevo, Inc.
(GEVO) is the stronger pick with 849. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -61. 9% for Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG). Analysts rate Aemetis, Inc. (AMTX) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PLAG or AMTX or GEVO or PLUG or BE?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1013%, compared to -89.
6% for Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +934. 6% versus PLAG's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PLAG or AMTX or GEVO or PLUG or BE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Planet Green Holdings Corp.
(PLAG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 36β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 61β — meaning BE is approximately 166% more volatile than PLAG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PLAG or AMTX or GEVO or PLUG or BE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gevo, Inc.
(GEVO) is pulling ahead at 849. 3% versus -61. 9% for Planet Green Holdings Corp. (PLAG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GEVO leads at 415. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PLAG or AMTX or GEVO or PLUG or BE?
Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the more profitable company, earning -4.
4% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -99. 0% for PLAG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PLAG or AMTX or GEVO or PLUG or BE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GEVO: 72.
4% to $3. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — PLAG or AMTX or GEVO or PLUG or BE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is PLAG or AMTX or GEVO or PLUG or BE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+934.
6% 10Y return). Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BE: +934. 6%, PLUG: +62. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PLAG and AMTX and GEVO and PLUG and BE?
These companies operate in different sectors (PLAG (Consumer Defensive) and AMTX (Energy) and GEVO (Basic Materials) and PLUG (Industrials) and BE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PLAG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GEVO is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.