Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PLAY vs DENN vs EAT vs TXRH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
PLAY vs DENN vs EAT vs TXRH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $664M | $322M | $6.27B | $10.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.11B | $457M | $5.73B | $6.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $300K | $10M | $463M | $415M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | 43.8% | 46.0% | 18.7% |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | 8.4% | 10.4% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 82.9x | 15.0x | 13.7x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.14B | $408M | $1.69B | $1.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $2M | $19M | $135M |
PLAY vs DENN vs EAT vs TXRH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dave & Buster's Ent… (PLAY) | 100 | 79.4 | -20.6% |
| Denny's Corporation (DENN) | 100 | 57.4 | -42.6% |
| Brinker Internation… (EAT) | 100 | 555.2 | +455.2% |
| Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH) | 100 | 304.6 | +204.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLAY vs DENN vs EAT vs TXRH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLAY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DENN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.65, current ratio 0.42x
- Beta 0.65 vs PLAY's 2.24
- +39.8% vs PLAY's -50.1%
EAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 21.9%, EPS growth 144.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.3%
- PEG 0.20 vs TXRH's 1.17
- 21.9% revenue growth vs PLAY's -3.3%
- Lower P/E (13.7x vs 25.0x), PEG 0.20 vs 1.17
TXRH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 1.7%
- 288.0% 10Y total return vs EAT's 229.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, current ratio 0.50x
- 1.7% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.9% revenue growth vs PLAY's -3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 25.0x), PEG 0.20 vs 1.17 | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.1% margin vs PLAY's 0.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs PLAY's 2.24 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.8% vs PLAY's -50.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs PLAY's 0.0%, ROIC 19.1% vs 5.1% |
PLAY vs DENN vs EAT vs TXRH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PLAY vs DENN vs EAT vs TXRH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EAT leads in 3 of 6 categories
PLAY leads 1 • DENN leads 1 • TXRH leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXRH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 13.3x DENN's $457M. EAT is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLAY's 0.0%. On growth, TXRH holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $457M | $5.7B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $405M | $55M | $819M | $709M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $300,000 | $10M | $463M | $415M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$175M | $2M | $504M | $441M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.7% | +43.8% | +46.0% | +18.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +8.4% | +10.4% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +2.2% | +8.1% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.3% | +0.5% | +8.8% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.1% | +1.3% | +3.2% | +12.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.2% | -89.9% | +12.1% | +10.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PLAY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.2x trailing earnings, PLAY trades at a 72% valuation discount to TXRH's 25.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EAT offers better value at 0.26x vs TXRH's 0.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $664M | $322M | $6.3B | $10.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.8B | $728M | $7.9B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.17x | 15.24x | 17.58x | 25.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 82.90x | 15.02x | 13.66x | 25.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.26x | 0.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.28x | 12.10x | 11.06x | 17.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 0.71x | 1.17x | 1.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.87x | — | 18.18x | 7.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 350.62x | 15.17x | 30.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EAT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EAT delivers a 123.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $123 in annual profit, vs $0 for PLAY. TXRH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLAY's 21.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DENN scores 7/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.2% | — | +123.4% | +37.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | +2.0% | +17.0% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | +9.7% | +19.1% | +14.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.4% | +11.9% | +25.8% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 21.53x | — | 4.57x | 1.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.1B | $406M | $1.7B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $2M | $19M | $135M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.1B | $408M | $1.7B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.06x | 1.73x | 18.61x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EAT five years ago would be worth $22,577 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,334 for PLAY. Over the past 12 months, DENN leads with a +39.8% total return vs PLAY's -50.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EAT at 58.2% vs PLAY's -33.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.6% | +0.6% | -3.4% | -7.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -50.1% | +39.8% | +5.3% | -6.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.2% | -41.3% | +295.8% | +53.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.7% | -64.9% | +125.8% | +61.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.4% | -42.9% | +229.9% | +288.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.2% | -16.3% | +58.2% | +15.4% |
Risk & Volatility
DENN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DENN is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLAY's 2.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DENN currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs PLAY's 29.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.24x | 0.65x | 1.12x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.53 | $6.26 | $187.12 | $199.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.65 | $3.36 | $100.30 | $153.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.5% | +99.8% | +78.2% | +79.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.3 | 66.9 | 50.6 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 0 | 1.2M | 983K |
Analyst Outlook
TXRH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLAY as "Buy", DENN as "Buy", EAT as "Buy", TXRH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 93.4% upside for PLAY (target: $20) vs -4.0% for DENN (target: $6). TXRH is the only dividend payer here at 1.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.25 | $6.00 | $184.46 | $191.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 21 | 47 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +26.2% | +3.6% | +1.4% | +1.4% |
EAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PLAY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
PLAY vs DENN vs EAT vs TXRH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLAY or DENN or EAT or TXRH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) is the stronger pick with 21. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) offers the better valuation at 7. 2x trailing P/E (82. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLAY or DENN or EAT or TXRH?
On trailing P/E, Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
(PLAY) is the cheapest at 7. 2x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. at 25. 9x. On forward P/E, Brinker International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Brinker International, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 's 1. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLAY or DENN or EAT or TXRH?
Over the past 5 years, Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) delivered a total return of +125. 8%, compared to -76. 7% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +288. 0% versus PLAY's -71. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLAY or DENN or EAT or TXRH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
65β versus Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. 's 2. 24β — meaning PLAY is approximately 243% more volatile than DENN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 127% versus 22% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLAY or DENN or EAT or TXRH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) is pulling ahead at 21. 9% versus -3. 3% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brinker International, Inc. grew EPS 144. 7% year-over-year, compared to -49. 3% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLAY leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLAY or DENN or EAT or TXRH?
Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus 2. 7% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLAY leads at 10. 3% versus 8. 6% for TXRH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLAY leads at 85. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLAY or DENN or EAT or TXRH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 's 1. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 82. 9x for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — 69. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLAY: 93. 4% to $20. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLAY or DENN or EAT or TXRH?
In this comparison, TXRH (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. PLAY, DENN, EAT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PLAY or DENN or EAT or TXRH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 1. 7% yield, +288. 0% 10Y return). Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) carries a higher beta of 2. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXRH: +288. 0%, PLAY: -71. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLAY and DENN and EAT and TXRH?
These companies operate in different sectors (PLAY (Communication Services) and DENN (Consumer Cyclical) and EAT (Consumer Cyclical) and TXRH (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PLAY is a small-cap deep-value stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock; EAT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TXRH pays a dividend while PLAY, DENN, EAT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.