Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PLAY vs EAT vs TXRH vs DENN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PLAY
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$664M
5Y Perf.-20.6%
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.27B
5Y Perf.+455.2%
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.41B
5Y Perf.+204.6%
DENN
Denny's Corporation

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$322M
5Y Perf.-42.6%

PLAY vs EAT vs TXRH vs DENN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PLAY logoPLAY
EAT logoEAT
TXRH logoTXRH
DENN logoDENN
IndustryEntertainmentRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurants
Market Cap$664M$6.27B$10.41B$322M
Revenue (TTM)$2.11B$5.73B$6.06B$457M
Net Income (TTM)$300K$463M$415M$10M
Gross Margin30.7%46.0%18.7%43.8%
Operating Margin7.1%10.4%8.2%8.4%
Forward P/E82.9x13.7x25.0x15.0x
Total Debt$3.14B$1.69B$1.89B$408M
Cash & Equiv.$7M$19M$135M$2M

PLAY vs EAT vs TXRH vs DENNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PLAY
EAT
TXRH
DENN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Dave & Buster's Ent… (PLAY)10079.4-20.6%
Brinker Internation… (EAT)100555.2+455.2%
Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH)100304.6+204.6%
Denny's Corporation (DENN)10057.4-42.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PLAY vs EAT vs TXRH vs DENN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: EAT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Denny's Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. TXRH also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PLAY
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
The Secondary Option

PLAY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
The Growth Play

EAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 21.9%, EPS growth 144.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.3%
  • PEG 0.20 vs TXRH's 1.17
  • 21.9% revenue growth vs PLAY's -3.3%
  • Lower P/E (13.7x vs 15.0x)
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
The Income Pick

TXRH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 1.7%
  • 288.0% 10Y total return vs EAT's 229.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.70, current ratio 0.50x
  • 1.7% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
DENN
Denny's Corporation
The Defensive Pick

DENN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 0.65, current ratio 0.42x
  • Beta 0.65 vs PLAY's 2.24
  • +39.8% vs PLAY's -50.1%
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthEAT logoEAT21.9% revenue growth vs PLAY's -3.3%
ValueEAT logoEATLower P/E (13.7x vs 15.0x)
Quality / MarginsEAT logoEAT8.1% margin vs PLAY's 0.0%
Stability / SafetyDENN logoDENNBeta 0.65 vs PLAY's 2.24
DividendsTXRH logoTXRH1.7% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)DENN logoDENN+39.8% vs PLAY's -50.1%
Efficiency (ROA)EAT logoEAT17.0% ROA vs PLAY's 0.0%, ROIC 19.1% vs 5.1%

PLAY vs EAT vs TXRH vs DENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PLAYDave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
FY 2024
Entertainment
65.2%$1.4B
Food and Beverage
34.8%$742M
EATBrinker International, Inc.
FY 2025
Chili's Restaurants
90.7%$4.9B
Maggiano's Restaurants
9.3%$501M
TXRHTexas Roadhouse, Inc.
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
99.5%$5.8B
Franchise royalties
0.5%$28M
Franchise fees
0.0%$3M
DENNDenny's Corporation
FY 2024
Franchise
34.7%$241M
Franchisor Owned Outlet
30.6%$212M
Royalty
17.1%$119M
Advertising
11.5%$80M
Occupancy
4.8%$33M
License
1.3%$9M

PLAY vs EAT vs TXRH vs DENN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLEATLAGGINGDENN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

EAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

TXRH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 13.3x DENN's $457M. EAT is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLAY's 0.0%. On growth, TXRH holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …DENN logoDENNDenny's Corporati…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.1B$5.7B$6.1B$457M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$405M$819M$709M$55M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$300,000$463M$415M$10M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$175M$504M$441M$2M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+30.7%+46.0%+18.7%+43.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+7.1%+10.4%+8.2%+8.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.0%+8.1%+6.8%+2.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.3%+8.8%+7.3%+0.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-1.1%+3.2%+12.8%+1.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-45.2%+12.1%+10.0%-89.9%
EAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PLAY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 7.2x trailing earnings, PLAY trades at a 72% valuation discount to TXRH's 25.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EAT offers better value at 0.26x vs TXRH's 0.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …DENN logoDENNDenny's Corporati…
Market CapShares × price$664M$6.3B$10.4B$322M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.8B$7.9B$12.2B$728M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS7.17x17.58x25.89x15.24x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.82.90x13.66x25.05x15.02x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.26x0.38x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.28x11.06x17.15x12.10x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.31x1.17x1.77x0.71x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.87x18.18x7.09x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.17x30.44x350.62x
PLAY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

EAT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

EAT delivers a 123.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $123 in annual profit, vs $0 for PLAY. TXRH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLAY's 21.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EAT scores 7/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …DENN logoDENNDenny's Corporati…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.2%+123.4%+37.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.0%+17.0%+12.2%+2.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.1%+19.1%+14.5%+9.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.4%+25.8%+20.1%+11.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96747
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage21.53x4.57x1.27x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.1B$1.7B$1.8B$406M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$19M$135M$2M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.1B$1.7B$1.9B$408M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.06x18.61x1.73x
EAT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

EAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EAT five years ago would be worth $22,577 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,334 for PLAY. Over the past 12 months, DENN leads with a +39.8% total return vs PLAY's -50.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EAT at 58.2% vs PLAY's -33.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …DENN logoDENNDenny's Corporati…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-38.6%-3.4%-7.4%+0.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-50.1%+5.3%-6.2%+39.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-70.2%+295.8%+53.6%-41.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-76.7%+125.8%+61.6%-64.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-71.4%+229.9%+288.0%-42.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-33.2%+58.2%+15.4%-16.3%
EAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

DENN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

DENN is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLAY's 2.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DENN currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs PLAY's 29.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …DENN logoDENNDenny's Corporati…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.24x1.12x0.70x0.65x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$35.53$187.12$199.99$6.26
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.65$100.30$153.82$3.36
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+29.5%+78.2%+79.0%+99.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.350.645.766.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.7M1.2M983K0
DENN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TXRH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: PLAY as "Buy", EAT as "Buy", TXRH as "Hold", DENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 93.4% upside for PLAY (target: $20) vs -4.0% for DENN (target: $6). TXRH is the only dividend payer here at 1.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricPLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …DENN logoDENNDenny's Corporati…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$20.25$184.46$191.64$6.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts19474321
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0050
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.71
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+26.2%+1.4%+1.4%+3.6%
TXRH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

EAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PLAY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallBrinker International, Inc. (EAT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PLAY vs EAT vs TXRH vs DENN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PLAY or EAT or TXRH or DENN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is the stronger pick with 21. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) offers the better valuation at 7. 2x trailing P/E (82. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PLAY or EAT or TXRH or DENN?

On trailing P/E, Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.

(PLAY) is the cheapest at 7. 2x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. at 25. 9x. On forward P/E, Brinker International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Brinker International, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 's 1. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PLAY or EAT or TXRH or DENN?

Over the past 5 years, Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) delivered a total return of +125. 8%, compared to -76. 7% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +288. 0% versus PLAY's -71. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PLAY or EAT or TXRH or DENN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

65β versus Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. 's 2. 24β — meaning PLAY is approximately 243% more volatile than DENN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 127% versus 22% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PLAY or EAT or TXRH or DENN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is pulling ahead at 21. 9% versus -3. 3% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brinker International, Inc. grew EPS 144. 7% year-over-year, compared to -49. 3% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLAY leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PLAY or EAT or TXRH or DENN?

Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus 2. 7% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLAY leads at 10. 3% versus 8. 6% for TXRH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLAY leads at 85. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PLAY or EAT or TXRH or DENN more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 's 1. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 82. 9x for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — 69. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLAY: 93. 4% to $20. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PLAY or EAT or TXRH or DENN?

In this comparison, TXRH (1.

7% yield) pays a dividend. PLAY, EAT, DENN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PLAY or EAT or TXRH or DENN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 1. 7% yield, +288. 0% 10Y return). Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) carries a higher beta of 2. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXRH: +288. 0%, PLAY: -71. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PLAY and EAT and TXRH and DENN?

These companies operate in different sectors (PLAY (Communication Services) and EAT (Consumer Cyclical) and TXRH (Consumer Cyclical) and DENN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PLAY is a small-cap deep-value stock; EAT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock. TXRH pays a dividend while PLAY, EAT, DENN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PLAY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EAT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TXRH

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DENN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PLAY and EAT and TXRH and DENN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PLAY: -1.1% · EAT: 3.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(PLAY: 7.2x · EAT: 17.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.