Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PLAY vs SBUX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
PLAY vs SBUX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $664M | $118.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.11B | $37.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $300K | $1.37B |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | 20.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | 9.0% |
| Forward P/E | 82.9x | 44.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.14B | $26.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $3.22B |
PLAY vs SBUX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dave & Buster's Ent… (PLAY) | 100 | 79.4 | -20.6% |
| Starbucks Corporati… (SBUX) | 100 | 133.7 | +33.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLAY vs SBUX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLAY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -3.3%, EPS growth -49.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.8%
SBUX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 2.3%
- 114.8% 10Y total return vs PLAY's -71.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, current ratio 0.72x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.8% revenue growth vs PLAY's -3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (44.0x vs 82.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.6% margin vs PLAY's 0.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs PLAY's 2.24 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.0% vs PLAY's -50.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs PLAY's 0.0%, ROIC 17.7% vs 5.1% |
PLAY vs SBUX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PLAY vs SBUX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBUX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBUX is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.7B annually — 17.9x PLAY's $2.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.6% (SBUX) to 0.0% (PLAY). On growth, SBUX holds the edge at +5.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $37.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $405M | $5.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $300,000 | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$175M | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.7% | +20.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +3.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.3% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.1% | +5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.2% | -62.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PLAY leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.2x trailing earnings, PLAY trades at a 89% valuation discount to SBUX's 64.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PLAY's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SBUX's 27.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $664M | $118.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.8B | $142.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.17x | 63.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 82.90x | 44.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.10x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.28x | 27.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.87x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 48.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SBUX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLAY scores 6/9 vs SBUX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | +17.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.4% | +16.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 21.53x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.1B | $23.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.1B | $26.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.06x | 6.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SBUX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SBUX five years ago would be worth $10,075 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,334 for PLAY. Over the past 12 months, SBUX leads with a +29.0% total return vs PLAY's -50.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SBUX at 1.3% vs PLAY's -33.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -38.6% | +24.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -50.1% | +29.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.2% | +3.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.7% | +0.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.4% | +114.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.2% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
SBUX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBUX is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLAY's 2.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBUX currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs PLAY's 29.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.24x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.53 | $107.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.65 | $77.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.5% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.3 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 7.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SBUX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PLAY as "Buy" and SBUX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 93.4% upside for PLAY (target: $20) vs 4.0% for SBUX (target: $108). SBUX is the only dividend payer here at 2.33% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.25 | $108.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +26.2% | 0.0% |
SBUX leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PLAY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
PLAY vs SBUX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLAY or SBUX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) is the stronger pick with 2.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) offers the better valuation at 7. 2x trailing P/E (82. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLAY or SBUX?
On trailing P/E, Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
(PLAY) is the cheapest at 7. 2x versus Starbucks Corporation at 64. 0x. On forward P/E, Starbucks Corporation is actually cheaper at 44. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLAY or SBUX?
Over the past 5 years, Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) delivered a total return of +0.
8%, compared to -76. 7% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBUX returned +114. 8% versus PLAY's -71. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLAY or SBUX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
99β versus Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. 's 2. 24β — meaning PLAY is approximately 127% more volatile than SBUX relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — PLAY or SBUX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) is pulling ahead at 2.
8% versus -3. 3% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. grew EPS -49. 3% year-over-year, compared to -50. 8% for Starbucks Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLAY leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLAY or SBUX?
Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
0% net margin versus 2. 7% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLAY leads at 10. 3% versus 9. 6% for SBUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLAY leads at 85. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLAY or SBUX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) trades at 44.
0x forward P/E versus 82. 9x for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — 38. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLAY: 93. 4% to $20. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLAY or SBUX?
In this comparison, SBUX (2.
3% yield) pays a dividend. PLAY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PLAY or SBUX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
99), 2. 3% yield, +114. 8% 10Y return). Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) carries a higher beta of 2. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBUX: +114. 8%, PLAY: -71. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLAY and SBUX?
These companies operate in different sectors (PLAY (Communication Services) and SBUX (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PLAY is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBUX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SBUX pays a dividend while PLAY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.