Other Precious Metals
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PLG vs NEM vs AEM vs KGC vs HL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
Gold
Gold
Gold
PLG vs NEM vs AEM vs KGC vs HL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Other Precious Metals | Gold | Gold | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $220M | $129.09B | $96.80B | $37.74B | $12.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $17.23B | $11.87B | $7.94B | $1.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $5.26B | $4.45B | $2.86B | $559M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.1% | 57.3% | 52.8% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 49.3% | 52.9% | 48.2% | 44.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.2x | 13.9x | 10.1x | 20.7x |
| Total Debt | $258K | $474M | $321M | $777M | $299M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $417K | $7.65B | $2.87B | $1.75B | $242M |
PLG vs NEM vs AEM vs KGC vs HL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platinum Group Meta… (PLG) | 100 | 118.7 | +18.7% |
| Newmont Corporation (NEM) | 100 | 199.3 | +99.3% |
| Agnico Eagle Mines … (AEM) | 100 | 301.9 | +201.9% |
| Kinross Gold Corpor… (KGC) | 100 | 481.1 | +381.1% |
| Hecla Mining Company (HL) | 100 | 560.5 | +460.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLG vs NEM vs AEM vs KGC vs HL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, PLG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NEM is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 0.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AEM's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
AEM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 0.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 2.02x
- PEG 0.42 vs NEM's 0.87
- Beta 0.66, yield 0.7%, current ratio 2.02x
KGC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs HL's 373.7%
- Lower P/E (10.1x vs 20.7x)
- 23.4% ROA vs PLG's -6.4%, ROIC 29.9% vs -7.0%
HL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 7.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.6%
- 53.0% revenue growth vs PLG's 6.1%
- +278.6% vs PLG's +47.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.0% revenue growth vs PLG's 6.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 20.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs PLG's 0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs PLG's 2.31 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AEM's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +278.6% vs PLG's +47.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.4% ROA vs PLG's -6.4%, ROIC 29.9% vs -7.0% |
PLG vs NEM vs AEM vs KGC vs HL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PLG vs NEM vs AEM vs KGC vs HL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KGC leads in 3 of 6 categories
AEM leads 1 • PLG leads 0 • NEM leads 0 • HL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEM and PLG operate at a comparable scale, with $17.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. AEM is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NEM's 30.5%. On growth, AEM holds the edge at +64.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $17.2B | $11.9B | $7.9B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $12.7B | $7.9B | $5.0B | $853M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $5.3B | $4.4B | $2.9B | $559M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $12.9B | $4.4B | $3.0B | $472M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +52.1% | +57.3% | +52.8% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +49.3% | +52.9% | +48.2% | +44.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +30.5% | +37.5% | +36.0% | +35.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +75.0% | +37.1% | +38.0% | +30.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% | +64.9% | +58.6% | +57.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.2% | -100.0% | +199.0% | +130.0% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
KGC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, KGC trades at a 58% valuation discount to HL's 38.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AEM offers better value at 0.65x vs NEM's 1.42x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $220M | $129.1B | $96.8B | $37.7B | $12.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $220M | $121.9B | $94.3B | $36.8B | $12.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -41.40x | 18.18x | 21.81x | 15.83x | 37.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.17x | 13.94x | 10.13x | 20.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.42x | 0.65x | 1.28x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.29x | 11.82x | 8.60x | 17.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.84x | 8.13x | 5.26x | 8.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.16x | 3.79x | 3.93x | 4.45x | 4.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.69x | 22.71x | 14.69x | 40.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KGC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KGC delivers a 33.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PLG. PLG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HL's 0.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEM scores 9/9 vs PLG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.7% | +15.6% | +19.3% | +33.9% | +22.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | +9.4% | +13.7% | +23.4% | +16.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.0% | +24.9% | +21.9% | +29.9% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.8% | +20.7% | +20.9% | +29.8% | +16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.01x | 0.01x | 0.09x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$159,000 | -$7.2B | -$2.5B | -$975M | $57M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $417,000 | $7.6B | $2.9B | $1.8B | $242M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $258,000 | $474M | $321M | $777M | $299M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 50.54x | 73.32x | 58.61x | 19.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KGC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KGC five years ago would be worth $41,544 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,663 for PLG. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +278.6% total return vs PLG's +47.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KGC at 81.8% vs PLG's 1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.6% | +15.4% | +13.6% | +11.5% | -1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.1% | +122.4% | +69.9% | +114.3% | +278.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.5% | +148.4% | +233.6% | +501.0% | +203.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.4% | +81.7% | +194.1% | +315.4% | +161.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.7% | +302.6% | +363.7% | +520.1% | +373.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.1% | +35.4% | +49.4% | +81.8% | +44.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NEM and AEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLG's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEM currently trades 86.4% from its 52-week high vs PLG's 44.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.31x | 0.86x | 0.66x | 0.84x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.04 | $134.88 | $255.24 | $39.11 | $34.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.08 | $48.27 | $103.38 | $13.28 | $4.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.1% | +86.4% | +75.7% | +80.6% | +54.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 51.5 | 41.7 | 45.9 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 9.1M | 2.5M | 8.8M | 15.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NEM and AEM and KGC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NEM as "Buy", AEM as "Buy", KGC as "Buy", HL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 34.1% upside for KGC (target: $42) vs 18.0% for NEM (target: $138). For income investors, NEM offers the higher dividend yield at 0.86% vs KGC's 0.40%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.50 | $237.71 | $42.25 | $22.21 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 | 31 | 28 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | +0.7% | +0.4% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 | $1.45 | $0.13 | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% | +0.7% | +1.6% | +0.0% |
KGC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AEM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
PLG vs NEM vs AEM vs KGC vs HL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLG or NEM or AEM or KGC or HL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger pick with 53.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 19. 1% for Newmont Corporation (NEM). Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Newmont Corporation (NEM) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLG or NEM or AEM or KGC or HL?
On trailing P/E, Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) is the cheapest at 15.
8x versus Hecla Mining Company at 38. 0x. On forward P/E, Kinross Gold Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Agnico Eagle Mines Limited wins at 0. 42x versus Newmont Corporation's 0. 87x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLG or NEM or AEM or KGC or HL?
Over the past 5 years, Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) delivered a total return of +315.
4%, compared to -63. 4% for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KGC returned +520. 1% versus PLG's -93. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLG or NEM or AEM or KGC or HL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
66β versus Platinum Group Metals Ltd. 's 2. 31β — meaning PLG is approximately 251% more volatile than AEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 12% for Hecla Mining Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLG or NEM or AEM or KGC or HL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is pulling ahead at 53.
0% versus 19. 1% for Newmont Corporation (NEM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to 5. 1% for Platinum Group Metals Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEM leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLG or NEM or AEM or KGC or HL?
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the more profitable company, earning 37.
5% net margin versus 0. 0% for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. — meaning it keeps 37. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEM leads at 53. 1% versus 0. 0% for PLG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEM leads at 58. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLG or NEM or AEM or KGC or HL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus Newmont Corporation's 0. 87x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for Hecla Mining Company — 10. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KGC: 34. 1% to $42. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLG or NEM or AEM or KGC or HL?
In this comparison, NEM (0.
9% yield), AEM (0. 7% yield), KGC (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. PLG, HL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PLG or NEM or AEM or KGC or HL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
66), 0. 7% yield, +363. 7% 10Y return). Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AEM: +363. 7%, PLG: -93. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLG and NEM and AEM and KGC and HL?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PLG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KGC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. NEM, AEM pay a dividend while PLG, KGC, HL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.