Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PLPC vs APOG vs AWI vs BMI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Construction
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
PLPC vs APOG vs AWI vs BMI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Construction | Construction | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $1.69B | $787M | $7.05B | $3.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $697M | $1.40B | $1.65B | $917M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $34M | $54M | $306M | $142M |
| Gross Margin | 30.9% | 22.7% | 40.3% | 41.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 6.7% | 27.5% | 20.0% |
| Forward P/E | 34.4x | 10.6x | 19.9x | 27.3x |
| Total Debt | $48M | $286M | $532M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $83M | $40M | $113M | $226M |
PLPC vs APOG vs AWI vs BMI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preformed Line Prod… (PLPC) | 100 | 696.1 | +596.1% |
| Apogee Enterprises,… (APOG) | 100 | 177.1 | +77.1% |
| Armstrong World Ind… (AWI) | 100 | 219.0 | +119.0% |
| Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) | 100 | 200.4 | +100.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLPC vs APOG vs AWI vs BMI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLPC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs AWI's 330.4%
- 12.7% revenue growth vs APOG's 3.2%
- +159.0% vs BMI's -45.0%
APOG is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.32 vs PLPC's 9.54
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 27.3x), PEG 0.32 vs 1.18
- 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs BMI's 1.2%
AWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 59.0%, current ratio 1.46x
- 18.6% margin vs APOG's 3.9%
- Beta 0.82 vs PLPC's 1.58
BMI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 33 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 1.2%
- Beta 0.87, yield 1.2%, current ratio 3.36x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.7% revenue growth vs APOG's 3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 27.3x), PEG 0.32 vs 1.18 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs APOG's 3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs PLPC's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs BMI's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +159.0% vs BMI's -45.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs APOG's 4.8%, ROIC 24.9% vs 8.1% |
PLPC vs APOG vs AWI vs BMI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PLPC vs APOG vs AWI vs BMI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
APOG leads in 1 of 6 categories
AWI leads 1 • PLPC leads 1 • BMI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AWI and BMI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 2.4x PLPC's $697M. AWI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to APOG's 3.9%. On growth, PLPC holds the edge at +18.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $697M | $1.4B | $1.6B | $917M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $73M | $57M | $603M | $218M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $34M | $54M | $306M | $142M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $35M | $95M | $247M | $170M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +22.7% | +40.3% | +41.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +6.7% | +27.5% | +20.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +3.9% | +18.6% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +6.8% | +15.0% | +18.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.7% | +1.6% | +7.1% | +7.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.2% | +6.1% | -1.9% | +9.6% |
Valuation Metrics
APOG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, APOG trades at a 70% valuation discount to PLPC's 48.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), APOG offers better value at 0.43x vs PLPC's 13.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $787M | $7.0B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $1.0B | $7.5B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 48.39x | 14.52x | 23.32x | 25.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.44x | 10.64x | 19.87x | 27.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 13.40x | 0.43x | — | 1.10x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.22x | 21.95x | 17.23x | 15.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.53x | 0.56x | 4.35x | 3.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.59x | 1.53x | 7.99x | 5.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 50.75x | 8.27x | 28.63x | 21.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI delivers a 34.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $7 for PLPC. PLPC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AWI's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs BMI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | +10.8% | +34.8% | +19.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +4.8% | +16.0% | +14.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.8% | +8.1% | +24.9% | +34.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.0% | +9.7% | +26.5% | +24.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.56x | 0.59x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$35M | $247M | $419M | -$226M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $83M | $40M | $113M | $226M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $48M | $286M | $532M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 39.48x | 5.97x | 13.31x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLPC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLPC five years ago would be worth $50,171 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,292 for APOG. Over the past 12 months, PLPC leads with a +159.0% total return vs BMI's -45.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AWI at 36.0% vs BMI's -2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +63.2% | -1.3% | -16.0% | -30.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +159.0% | -2.8% | +11.5% | -45.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.2% | -0.1% | +151.8% | -8.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +401.7% | +12.9% | +63.0% | +39.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +794.9% | +10.5% | +330.4% | +253.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.7% | -0.0% | +36.0% | -2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PLPC and AWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLPC's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLPC currently trades 92.9% from its 52-week high vs BMI's 47.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.58x | 1.25x | 0.82x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $371.80 | $49.99 | $206.08 | $256.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $132.15 | $30.75 | $148.25 | $112.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.9% | +73.2% | +80.1% | +47.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.9 | 53.6 | 41.3 | 39.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 165K | 253K | 494K | 560K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — APOG and BMI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLPC as "Buy", APOG as "Hold", AWI as "Buy", BMI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 92.7% upside for APOG (target: $71) vs -20.4% for PLPC (target: $275). For income investors, APOG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs PLPC's 0.24%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $275.00 | $70.50 | $197.50 | $172.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 6 | 26 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +2.8% | +0.8% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 14 | 8 | 33 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.83 | $1.04 | $1.27 | $1.47 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +1.9% | +1.8% | +0.4% |
APOG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). AWI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
PLPC vs APOG vs AWI vs BMI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLPC or APOG or AWI or BMI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC) is the stronger pick with 12.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG). Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLPC or APOG or AWI or BMI?
On trailing P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
(APOG) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Preformed Line Products Company at 48. 4x. On forward P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Apogee Enterprises, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus Preformed Line Products Company's 9. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLPC or APOG or AWI or BMI?
Over the past 5 years, Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC) delivered a total return of +401.
7%, compared to +12. 9% for Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLPC returned +794. 9% versus APOG's +10. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLPC or APOG or AWI or BMI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Preformed Line Products Company's 1. 58β — meaning PLPC is approximately 94% more volatile than AWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 59% for Armstrong World Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLPC or APOG or AWI or BMI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC) is pulling ahead at 12.
7% versus 3. 2% for Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Armstrong World Industries, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -35. 2% for Apogee Enterprises, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BMI leads at 17. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLPC or APOG or AWI or BMI?
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus 3. 9% for Apogee Enterprises, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus 6. 0% for APOG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BMI leads at 41. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLPC or APOG or AWI or BMI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Preformed Line Products Company's 9. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 34. 4x for Preformed Line Products Company — 23. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APOG: 92. 7% to $70. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLPC or APOG or AWI or BMI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 0. 2% for Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC).
09Is PLPC or APOG or AWI or BMI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 0. 8% yield, +330. 4% 10Y return). Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWI: +330. 4%, PLPC: +794. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLPC and APOG and AWI and BMI?
These companies operate in different sectors (PLPC (Industrials) and APOG (Industrials) and AWI (Industrials) and BMI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PLPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APOG is a small-cap deep-value stock; AWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BMI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. APOG, AWI, BMI pay a dividend while PLPC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.