Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PLPC vs NVT vs HUBB vs PWR vs MYRG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
PLPC vs NVT vs HUBB vs PWR vs MYRG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $1.70B | $27.48B | $26.19B | $111.76B | $6.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $697M | $4.33B | $6.00B | $29.99B | $3.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $34M | $492M | $906M | $1.12B | $142M |
| Gross Margin | 30.9% | 37.0% | 35.5% | 13.6% | 11.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 15.8% | 20.8% | 5.8% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | 35.5x | 37.2x | 24.9x | 53.5x | 40.3x |
| Total Debt | $48M | $1.56B | $2.61B | $1.19B | $104M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $83M | $238M | $483M | $440M | $150M |
PLPC vs NVT vs HUBB vs PWR vs MYRG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preformed Line Prod… (PLPC) | 100 | 697.7 | +597.7% |
| nVent Electric plc (NVT) | 100 | 927.2 | +827.2% |
| Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) | 100 | 402.4 | +302.4% |
| Quanta Services, In… (PWR) | 100 | 2016.8 | +1916.8% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 1519.8 | +1419.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLPC vs NVT vs HUBB vs PWR vs MYRG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLPC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 29.5%, EPS growth 118.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.3%
- 29.5% revenue growth vs HUBB's 3.8%
HUBB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.32, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 67.6%, current ratio 1.72x
- PEG 1.20 vs PLPC's 9.84
- Beta 1.32, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.72x
PWR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 31.2% 10Y total return vs MYRG's 17.2%
MYRG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +182.4% vs HUBB's +40.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.5% revenue growth vs HUBB's 3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.9x vs 53.5x), PEG 1.20 vs 3.10 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.1% margin vs MYRG's 3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.32 vs PLPC's 1.70 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs PWR's 0.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +182.4% vs HUBB's +40.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.6% ROA vs PWR's 4.8%, ROIC 17.1% vs 11.8% |
PLPC vs NVT vs HUBB vs PWR vs MYRG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PLPC vs NVT vs HUBB vs PWR vs MYRG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HUBB leads in 3 of 6 categories
MYRG leads 1 • PWR leads 1 • PLPC leads 0 • NVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.0B annually — 43.0x PLPC's $697M. HUBB is the more profitable business, keeping 15.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MYRG's 3.7%. On growth, NVT holds the edge at +53.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $697M | $4.3B | $6.0B | $30.0B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $73M | $848M | $1.5B | $2.4B | $261M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $34M | $492M | $906M | $1.1B | $142M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $35M | $387M | $909M | $1.7B | $231M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +37.0% | +35.5% | +13.6% | +11.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +15.8% | +20.8% | +5.8% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +11.4% | +15.1% | +3.7% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +8.9% | +15.2% | +5.6% | +6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.7% | +53.5% | +11.1% | +26.3% | +20.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.2% | -59.7% | +8.3% | +51.0% | +106.2% |
Valuation Metrics
HUBB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.8x trailing earnings, HUBB trades at a 73% valuation discount to PWR's 109.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HUBB offers better value at 1.43x vs PLPC's 13.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $27.5B | $26.2B | $111.8B | $6.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $28.8B | $28.3B | $112.5B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 48.49x | 39.43x | 29.78x | 109.53x | 58.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 35.51x | 37.22x | 24.95x | 53.49x | 40.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 13.44x | — | 1.43x | 6.35x | 3.48x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.26x | 34.93x | 20.79x | 45.32x | 29.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.53x | 7.06x | 4.48x | 3.94x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.60x | 7.50x | 6.84x | 12.51x | 10.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 50.86x | 73.89x | 29.94x | 68.95x | 29.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HUBB delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $7 for PLPC. PLPC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HUBB's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MYRG scores 8/9 vs PWR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | +13.4% | +24.4% | +13.0% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +7.2% | +11.6% | +4.8% | +8.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.8% | +8.9% | +17.1% | +11.8% | +18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.0% | +10.5% | +20.1% | +11.3% | +19.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.42x | 0.68x | 0.13x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$35M | $1.3B | $2.1B | $748M | -$47M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $83M | $238M | $483M | $440M | $150M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $48M | $1.6B | $2.6B | $1.2B | $104M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 39.48x | 6.61x | 16.90x | 6.27x | 39.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PWR five years ago would be worth $74,205 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26,139 for HUBB. Over the past 12 months, MYRG leads with a +182.4% total return vs HUBB's +40.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PWR at 64.1% vs HUBB's 23.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +63.6% | +59.5% | +6.7% | +69.4% | +93.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +156.0% | +181.1% | +40.5% | +128.4% | +182.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.7% | +315.9% | +87.7% | +341.7% | +227.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +400.3% | +443.4% | +161.4% | +642.0% | +441.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +796.9% | +589.3% | +410.2% | +3118.4% | +1724.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.8% | +60.8% | +23.4% | +64.1% | +48.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVT and HUBB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HUBB is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLPC's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVT currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs HUBB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.70x | 1.67x | 1.32x | 1.32x | 1.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $371.80 | $174.50 | $565.50 | $788.72 | $475.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $133.27 | $60.46 | $353.52 | $320.56 | $152.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.1% | +97.4% | +87.1% | +94.4% | +92.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 73.8 | 38.0 | 73.6 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 165K | 2.3M | 547K | 1.1M | 297K |
Analyst Outlook
HUBB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLPC as "Buy", NVT as "Buy", HUBB as "Hold", PWR as "Buy", MYRG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for HUBB (target: $545) vs -20.6% for PLPC (target: $275). For income investors, HUBB offers the higher dividend yield at 1.09% vs PLPC's 0.24%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $275.00 | $180.29 | $545.43 | $665.29 | $412.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 19 | 17 | 35 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +0.5% | +1.1% | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.83 | $0.79 | $5.35 | $0.40 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +0.9% | +0.9% | +0.1% | +1.1% |
HUBB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MYRG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
PLPC vs NVT vs HUBB vs PWR vs MYRG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLPC or NVT or HUBB or PWR or MYRG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, nVent Electric plc (NVT) is the stronger pick with 29.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) offers the better valuation at 29. 8x trailing P/E (24. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLPC or NVT or HUBB or PWR or MYRG?
On trailing P/E, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the cheapest at 29.
8x versus Quanta Services, Inc. at 109. 5x. On forward P/E, Hubbell Incorporated is actually cheaper at 24. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hubbell Incorporated wins at 1. 20x versus Preformed Line Products Company's 9. 84x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLPC or NVT or HUBB or PWR or MYRG?
Over the past 5 years, Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) delivered a total return of +642. 0%, compared to +161. 4% for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +31. 2% versus HUBB's +410. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLPC or NVT or HUBB or PWR or MYRG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
32β versus Preformed Line Products Company's 1. 70β — meaning PLPC is approximately 29% more volatile than HUBB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Preformed Line Products Company (PLPC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 68% for Hubbell Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLPC or NVT or HUBB or PWR or MYRG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), nVent Electric plc (NVT) is pulling ahead at 29.
5% versus 3. 8% for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for Preformed Line Products Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVT leads at 19. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLPC or NVT or HUBB or PWR or MYRG?
nVent Electric plc (NVT) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
2% net margin versus 3. 2% for MYR Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBB leads at 20. 8% versus 4. 4% for MYRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVT leads at 37. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLPC or NVT or HUBB or PWR or MYRG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 20x versus Preformed Line Products Company's 9. 84x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) trades at 24. 9x forward P/E versus 53. 5x for Quanta Services, Inc. — 28. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HUBB: 10. 7% to $545. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLPC or NVT or HUBB or PWR or MYRG?
In this comparison, HUBB (1.
1% yield), NVT (0. 5% yield), PLPC (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. PWR, MYRG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PLPC or NVT or HUBB or PWR or MYRG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
1% yield, +410. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBB: +410. 2%, PWR: +31. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLPC and NVT and HUBB and PWR and MYRG?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PLPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HUBB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HUBB pays a dividend while PLPC, NVT, PWR, MYRG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.