Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PLSE vs INMD vs NVCR vs ISRG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
PLSE vs INMD vs NVCR vs ISRG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $1.30B | $884M | $2.04B | $159.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $350K | $375M | $674M | $10.58B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-73M | $87M | $-173M | $2.98B |
| Gross Margin | -204.3% | 77.8% | 75.2% | 66.3% |
| Operating Margin | -219.8% | 21.3% | -27.2% | 30.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.3x | — | 43.3x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $13M | $290M | $303M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81M | $303M | $103M | $3.37B |
PLSE vs INMD vs NVCR vs ISRG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pulse Biosciences, … (PLSE) | 100 | 209.9 | +109.9% |
| InMode Ltd. (INMD) | 100 | 95.2 | -4.8% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 232.8 | +132.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLSE vs INMD vs NVCR vs ISRG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLSE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +13.2% vs ISRG's -16.4%
INMD is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.04 vs ISRG's 1.99
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 43.3x), PEG 1.04 vs 1.99
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ISRG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.00
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 22.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs PLSE's 357.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 4.87x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs PLSE's -36.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 43.3x), PEG 1.04 vs 1.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.2% margin vs PLSE's -207.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs NVCR's 2.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.2% vs ISRG's -16.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.8% ROA vs PLSE's -63.5%, ROIC 15.0% vs -8.8% |
PLSE vs INMD vs NVCR vs ISRG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PLSE vs INMD vs NVCR vs ISRG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ISRG leads in 2 of 6 categories
INMD leads 1 • PLSE leads 1 • NVCR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.6B annually — 30234.6x PLSE's $350,000. ISRG is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLSE's -207.9%. On growth, ISRG holds the edge at +23.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $350,000 | $375M | $674M | $10.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$76M | $81M | -$165M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$73M | $87M | -$173M | $3.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$54M | $91M | -$48M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +77.8% | +75.2% | +66.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -219.8% | +21.3% | -27.2% | +30.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -207.9% | +23.3% | -25.7% | +28.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -155.5% | +24.2% | -7.1% | +26.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +5.3% | +12.3% | +23.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.2% | -30.8% | -100.0% | +18.8% |
Valuation Metrics
INMD leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, INMD trades at a 83% valuation discount to ISRG's 57.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), INMD offers better value at 0.98x vs ISRG's 2.63x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $884M | $2.0B | $159.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $595M | $2.2B | $156.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.67x | 9.76x | -14.66x | 57.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.32x | — | 43.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.98x | — | 2.63x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.91x | — | 43.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3719.24x | 2.39x | 3.11x | 15.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.94x | 1.34x | 5.86x | 9.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.49x | — | 64.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-73 for PLSE. ISRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ISRG scores 6/9 vs INMD's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -73.5% | +13.3% | -50.8% | +16.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -63.5% | +11.8% | -16.5% | +14.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.8% | +13.5% | -16.4% | +15.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -73.1% | +12.1% | -28.9% | +16.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.02x | 0.85x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$73M | -$289M | $187M | -$3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81M | $303M | $103M | $3.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $13M | $290M | $303M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -96.80x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLSE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ISRG five years ago would be worth $16,174 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $983 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, PLSE leads with a +13.2% total return vs ISRG's -16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLSE at 33.5% vs NVCR's -36.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +42.5% | -5.7% | +36.4% | -19.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.2% | -1.9% | +2.6% | -16.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.9% | -60.1% | -74.2% | +48.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.0% | -61.5% | -90.2% | +61.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +357.6% | +105.6% | +38.5% | +549.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.5% | -26.4% | -36.4% | +14.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVCR and ISRG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ISRG is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs PLSE's 72.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 1.00x | 2.15x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.30 | $16.74 | $20.06 | $603.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.56 | $12.72 | $9.82 | $427.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.5% | +83.4% | +89.2% | +74.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.4 | 46.6 | 70.9 | 43.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 242K | 815K | 1.4M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLSE as "Buy", INMD as "Hold", NVCR as "Buy", ISRG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 87.3% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 21.8% for INMD (target: $17).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.00 | $17.00 | $33.50 | $622.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 11 | 15 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +14.4% | 0.0% | +1.4% |
ISRG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). INMD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PLSE vs INMD vs NVCR vs ISRG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLSE or INMD or NVCR or ISRG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 2% for InMode Ltd. (INMD). InMode Ltd. (INMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pulse Biosciences, Inc. (PLSE) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLSE or INMD or NVCR or ISRG?
On trailing P/E, InMode Ltd.
(INMD) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. at 57. 2x. On forward P/E, InMode Ltd. is actually cheaper at 10. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: InMode Ltd. wins at 1. 04x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 1. 99x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLSE or INMD or NVCR or ISRG?
Over the past 5 years, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) delivered a total return of +61. 7%, compared to -90. 2% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +549. 2% versus NVCR's +38. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLSE or INMD or NVCR or ISRG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 115% more volatile than ISRG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLSE or INMD or NVCR or ISRG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus -6. 2% for InMode Ltd. (INMD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. grew EPS 22. 6% year-over-year, compared to -36. 4% for InMode Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ISRG leads at 17. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLSE or INMD or NVCR or ISRG?
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -207. 9% for Pulse Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ISRG leads at 29. 3% versus -219. 8% for PLSE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INMD leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLSE or INMD or NVCR or ISRG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, InMode Ltd. (INMD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 04x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 1. 99x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, InMode Ltd. (INMD) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 43. 3x for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. — 33. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 87. 3% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLSE or INMD or NVCR or ISRG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PLSE or INMD or NVCR or ISRG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), +549. 2% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ISRG: +549. 2%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLSE and INMD and NVCR and ISRG?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PLSE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.