Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PLUG vs SPIR vs BE vs ASTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Communication Equipment
PLUG vs SPIR vs BE vs ASTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Specialty Business Services | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $4.61B | $601.52B | $68.63B | $20.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $710M | $72M | $2.45B | $71M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.63B | $-25.02B | $6M | $-342M |
| Gross Margin | 99.8% | 40.8% | 31.1% | 53.4% |
| Operating Margin | 38.1% | -121.4% | 8.2% | -405.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.4x | 136.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $997M | $8.76B | $2.99B | $32M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $24.81B | $2.45B | $2.34B |
PLUG vs SPIR vs BE vs ASTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 12.5 | -87.5% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 23.2 | -76.8% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 1164.2 | +1064.2% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 698.1 | +598.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLUG vs SPIR vs BE vs ASTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLUG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 2.57
- Beta 2.57 vs BE's 3.61
SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
BE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 10.4% 10Y total return vs ASTS's 6.2%
- 0.2% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- +16.5% vs SPIR's +93.2%
- 0.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 4.1% vs 10.9%
ASTS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 16.35x
- Beta 2.82, current ratio 16.35x
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.2% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.57 vs BE's 3.61 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.5% vs SPIR's +93.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 4.1% vs 10.9% |
PLUG vs SPIR vs BE vs ASTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PLUG vs SPIR vs BE vs ASTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories
PLUG leads 0 • SPIR leads 0 • ASTS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 34.5x ASTS's $71M. BE is the more profitable business, keeping 0.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $710M | $72M | $2.4B | $71M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.5B | -$74M | $240M | -$237M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.6B | -$25.0B | $6M | -$342M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$16.2B | $233M | -$1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.8% | +40.8% | +31.1% | +53.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.1% | -121.4% | +8.2% | -4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -349.6% | +0.2% | -4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | -227.0% | +9.5% | -16.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.6% | -26.9% | +130.4% | +27.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.9% | +59.5% | +3.3% | -55.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PLUG and SPIR and BE each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $601.5B | $68.6B | $20.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.6B | $585.5B | $69.2B | $18.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 11.37x | -771.54x | -52.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 136.38x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 560.66x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.49x | 8406.65x | 33.91x | 291.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.18x | 86.55x | 6.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 1200.02x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PLUG and SPIR and ASTS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BE delivers a 0.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLUG scores 5/9 vs BE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -124.4% | -88.4% | +0.8% | -21.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -64.3% | -47.3% | +0.2% | -12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | -0.1% | +4.1% | -47.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.6% | -0.1% | +2.5% | -10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 19.75x | 0.08x | 3.77x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $996M | -$16.1B | $538M | -$2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $24.8B | $2.5B | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $997M | $8.8B | $3.0B | $32M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -36.18x | 9.20x | 1.05x | -21.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $128,359 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,467 for PLUG. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1647.1% total return vs SPIR's +93.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 156.3% vs PLUG's -29.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +48.4% | +134.3% | +189.3% | -15.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +320.2% | +93.2% | +1647.1% | +181.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.4% | +238.4% | +1584.2% | +1299.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.3% | -76.9% | +1183.6% | +808.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.4% | -75.9% | +1041.9% | +623.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.1% | +50.1% | +156.3% | +141.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PLUG and BE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PLUG is the less volatile stock with a 2.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BE currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs ASTS's 54.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.57x | 2.93x | 3.61x | 2.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.58 | $23.59 | $302.99 | $129.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.69 | $6.60 | $16.05 | $22.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.3% | +77.6% | +94.2% | +54.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.5 | 48.9 | 77.9 | 34.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 76.7M | 1.6M | 10.1M | 14.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLUG as "Buy", SPIR as "Buy", BE as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.6% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs -34.3% for BE (target: $188).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.91 | $17.25 | $187.56 | $103.65 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 38 | 12 | 31 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
PLUG vs SPIR vs BE vs ASTS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLUG or SPIR or BE or ASTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PLUG or SPIR or BE or ASTS?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1184%, compared to -85.
3% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +1042% versus SPIR's -75. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PLUG or SPIR or BE or ASTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Plug Power Inc.
(PLUG) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 57β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 61β — meaning BE is approximately 41% more volatile than PLUG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PLUG or SPIR or BE or ASTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PLUG or SPIR or BE or ASTS?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PLUG or SPIR or BE or ASTS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASTS: 46.
6% to $103. 65.
07Which pays a better dividend — PLUG or SPIR or BE or ASTS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is PLUG or SPIR or BE or ASTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1042% 10Y return).
Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BE: +1042%, SPIR: -75. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PLUG and SPIR and BE and ASTS?
These companies operate in different sectors (PLUG (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and BE (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.