PMNT
Perfect Moment Ltd. Common Stock
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$9M
5Y Perf.-94.4%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PMNT vs GOOS vs COLM vs UAA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GOOS
Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$549M
5Y Perf.-12.4%
COLM
Columbia Sportswear Company
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$3.31B
5Y Perf.-23.8%
UAA
Under Armour, Inc.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$1.29B
5Y Perf.-28.2%
PMNT vs GOOS vs COLM vs UAA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PMNT | GOOS | COLM | UAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $9M | $549M | $3.31B | $1.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23M | $1.46B | $3.40B | $4.98B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $22M | $169M | $-520M |
| Gross Margin | 56.1% | 70.2% | 50.3% | 46.6% |
| Operating Margin | -44.3% | 5.4% | 6.1% | -2.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.9x | 16.4x | 55.4x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $743M | $867M | $1.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $334M | $442M | $501M |
PMNT vs GOOS vs COLM vs UAA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PMNT
GOOS
COLM
UAA
| Stock | Feb 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perfect Moment Ltd.… (PMNT) | 100 | 5.6 | -94.4% |
| Canada Goose Holdin… (GOOS) | 100 | 87.6 | -12.4% |
| Columbia Sportswear… (COLM) | 100 | 76.2 | -23.8% |
| Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) | 100 | 71.8 | -28.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PMNT vs GOOS vs COLM vs UAA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GOOS and COLM are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Columbia Sportswear Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. PMNT also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PMNT
Perfect Moment Ltd. Common Stock
The Defensive Choice
PMNT is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.85 vs UAA's 1.36
Best for: stability
GOOS
Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick
GOOS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.32
- Rev growth 1.1%, EPS growth 70.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- 1.1% revenue growth vs PMNT's -12.0%
- Lower P/E (14.9x vs 55.4x)
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
COLM
Columbia Sportswear Company
The Long-Run Compounder
COLM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 25.9% 10Y total return vs GOOS's -25.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 50.7%, current ratio 2.59x
- Beta 1.17, yield 1.9%, current ratio 2.59x
- 5.0% margin vs PMNT's -56.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
UAA
Under Armour, Inc.
The Secondary Option
UAA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GOOS | 1.1% revenue growth vs PMNT's -12.0% |
| Value | GOOS | Lower P/E (14.9x vs 55.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | COLM | 5.0% margin vs PMNT's -56.2% |
| Stability / Safety | PMNT | Beta 0.85 vs UAA's 1.36 |
| Dividends | COLM | 1.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GOOS | +43.5% vs PMNT's -71.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | COLM | 6.1% ROA vs PMNT's -93.4%, ROIC 8.0% vs -243.5% |
PMNT vs GOOS vs COLM vs UAA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
PMNT vs GOOS vs COLM vs UAA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGOOSLAGGINGUAA
Who Leads Where
GOOS leads in 2 of 6 categories
COLM leads 1 • PMNT leads 0 • UAA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓UAAUnder Armour, Inc.
0leads
PMNTPerfect Moment Ltd. C…
0leads
COLMColumbia Sportswear C…
1leads
GOOSCanada Goose Holdings…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs COLMvs PMNTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GOOS3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GOOS4/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
COLM4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UAA is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.0B annually — 217.0x PMNT's $23M. COLM is the more profitable business, keeping 5.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PMNT's -56.2%. On growth, GOOS holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PMNTPerfect Moment Lt… | GOOSCanada Goose Hold… | COLMColumbia Sportswe… | UAAUnder Armour, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23M | $1.5B | $3.4B | $5.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $185M | $251M | -$4M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $22M | $169M | -$520M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $186M | $174M | -$46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.1% | +70.2% | +50.3% | +46.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -44.3% | +5.4% | +6.1% | -2.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -56.2% | +1.5% | +5.0% | -10.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -44.4% | +12.7% | +5.1% | -0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.0% | +14.2% | +0.0% | -5.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +101.7% | -4.2% | -13.3% | — |
GOOS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GOOS and UAA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.8x trailing earnings, GOOS trades at a 14% valuation discount to COLM's 19.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GOOS's 5.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COLM's 14.3x.
| Metric | PMNTPerfect Moment Lt… | GOOSCanada Goose Hold… | COLMColumbia Sportswe… | UAAUnder Armour, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $549M | $3.3B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $849M | $3.7B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.25x | 16.75x | 19.54x | -13.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.87x | 16.39x | 55.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.31x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.54x | 14.33x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.41x | 0.56x | 0.98x | 0.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.13x | 2.86x | 2.03x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.74x | 15.29x | — |
Evenly matched — GOOS and UAA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COLM delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-12 for PMNT. COLM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PMNT's 2.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOS scores 8/9 vs PMNT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | PMNTPerfect Moment Lt… | GOOSCanada Goose Hold… | COLMColumbia Sportswe… | UAAUnder Armour, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.2% | +3.7% | +10.3% | -36.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -93.4% | +1.2% | +6.1% | -11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -243.5% | +12.5% | +8.0% | -5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | +13.3% | +9.3% | -5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.37x | 1.33x | 0.51x | 0.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $408M | $425M | $798M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $334M | $442M | $501M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $743M | $867M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.75x | 1.96x | — | -5.74x |
GOOS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COLM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COLM five years ago would be worth $6,395 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $473 for PMNT. Over the past 12 months, GOOS leads with a +43.5% total return vs PMNT's -71.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COLM at -6.6% vs PMNT's -63.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PMNTPerfect Moment Lt… | GOOSCanada Goose Hold… | COLMColumbia Sportswe… | UAAUnder Armour, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -39.1% | -11.9% | +13.5% | +20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -71.4% | +43.5% | -0.2% | +11.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.3% | -42.1% | -18.4% | -26.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.3% | -72.5% | -36.1% | -73.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.3% | -25.9% | +25.9% | -83.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -63.8% | -16.6% | -6.6% | -9.6% |
COLM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PMNT and COLM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PMNT is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UAA's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COLM currently trades 88.3% from its 52-week high vs PMNT's 27.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PMNTPerfect Moment Lt… | GOOSCanada Goose Hold… | COLMColumbia Sportswe… | UAAUnder Armour, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 1.35x | 1.28x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.91 | $15.43 | $71.68 | $8.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.17 | $8.19 | $47.47 | $4.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.1% | +77.2% | +88.3% | +78.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.4 | 60.2 | 61.2 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.8M | 386K | 597K | 8.1M |
Evenly matched — PMNT and COLM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GOOS and COLM each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOOS as "Hold", COLM as "Hold", UAA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 62.3% upside for GOOS (target: $19) vs 0.0% for COLM (target: $63). COLM is the only dividend payer here at 1.89% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | PMNTPerfect Moment Lt… | GOOSCanada Goose Hold… | COLMColumbia Sportswe… | UAAUnder Armour, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $19.33 | $63.33 | $7.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 | 28 | 73 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.20 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +6.1% | +7.0% |
Evenly matched — GOOS and COLM each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
GOOS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). COLM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
Best OverallCanada Goose Holdings Inc. (GOOS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PMNT vs GOOS vs COLM vs UAA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PMNT or GOOS or COLM or UAA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
(GOOS) is the stronger pick with 1. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 0% for Perfect Moment Ltd. Common Stock (PMNT). Canada Goose Holdings Inc. (GOOS) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (14. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Canada Goose Holdings Inc. (GOOS) a "Hold" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PMNT or GOOS or COLM or UAA?
On trailing P/E, Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
(GOOS) is the cheapest at 16. 8x versus Columbia Sportswear Company at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Canada Goose Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PMNT or GOOS or COLM or UAA?
Over the past 5 years, Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) delivered a total return of -36.
1%, compared to -95. 3% for Perfect Moment Ltd. Common Stock (PMNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COLM returned +25. 4% versus PMNT's -95. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PMNT or GOOS or COLM or UAA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perfect Moment Ltd.
Common Stock (PMNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Under Armour, Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning UAA is approximately 39% more volatile than PMNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 2% for Perfect Moment Ltd. Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PMNT or GOOS or COLM or UAA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
(GOOS) is pulling ahead at 1. 1% versus -12. 0% for Perfect Moment Ltd. Common Stock (PMNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Canada Goose Holdings Inc. grew EPS 70. 2% year-over-year, compared to -190. 4% for Under Armour, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PMNT leads at 9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PMNT or GOOS or COLM or UAA?
Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
(GOOS) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 0% net margin versus -74. 1% for Perfect Moment Ltd. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 7. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOS leads at 12. 2% versus -64. 2% for PMNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOS leads at 69. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PMNT or GOOS or COLM or UAA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
(GOOS) trades at 14. 9x forward P/E versus 55. 4x for Under Armour, Inc. — 40. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GOOS: 62. 3% to $19. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — PMNT or GOOS or COLM or UAA?
In this comparison, COLM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. PMNT, GOOS, UAA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PMNT or GOOS or COLM or UAA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
28), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (COLM: +25. 4%, UAA: -83. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PMNT and GOOS and COLM and UAA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PMNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOS is a small-cap deep-value stock; COLM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. COLM pays a dividend while PMNT, GOOS, UAA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PMNT: -0.0% · GOOS: 14.2%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.