REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PMT vs IVR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
PMT vs IVR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $1.06B | $577M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.06B | $335M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $132M | $101M |
| Gross Margin | 88.9% | 50.5% |
| Operating Margin | 71.8% | 47.1% |
| Forward P/E | 7.8x | 3.7x |
| Total Debt | $19.09B | $5.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $272M | $56M |
PMT vs IVR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PennyMac Mortgage I… (PMT) | 100 | 110.2 | +10.2% |
| Invesco Mortgage Ca… (IVR) | 100 | 30.5 | -69.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PMT vs IVR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 13.2%
- Rev growth 245.8%, EPS growth -27.7%
- 121.8% 10Y total return vs IVR's -29.9%
IVR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.78, yield 20.1%, current ratio 0.04x
- Lower P/E (3.7x vs 7.8x)
- 30.2% margin vs PMT's 12.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 245.8% FFO/revenue growth vs IVR's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.7x vs 7.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.2% margin vs PMT's 12.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs IVR's 0.78 | |
| Dividends | 20.1% yield, vs PMT's 13.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.3% vs PMT's +7.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.7% ROA vs PMT's 0.7%, ROIC 4.0% vs 6.0% |
PMT vs IVR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PMT vs IVR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IVR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 3.2x IVR's $335M. IVR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PMT's 12.4%. On growth, IVR holds the edge at -58.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $335M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $967M | $158M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $132M | $101M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9.1B | $157M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +88.9% | +50.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +71.8% | +47.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +30.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.6% | +46.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -98.2% | -58.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.7% |
Valuation Metrics
IVR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, IVR trades at a 57% valuation discount to PMT's 12.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IVR's 19.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PMT's 20.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $577M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.9B | $6.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.25x | 5.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.78x | 3.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.41x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.61x | 19.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.60x | 1.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.56x | 0.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.42x | 3.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IVR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IVR delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for PMT. IVR carries lower financial leverage with a 7.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PMT's 10.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IVR scores 5/9 vs PMT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.2% | +40.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 10.12x | 7.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18.8B | $5.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $272M | $56M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19.1B | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.11x | 1.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PMT five years ago would be worth $10,172 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,225 for IVR. Over the past 12 months, IVR leads with a +30.3% total return vs PMT's +7.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PMT at 12.8% vs IVR's 9.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.9% | +0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.0% | +30.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.5% | +32.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.7% | -47.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +121.8% | -29.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.8% | +9.8% |
Risk & Volatility
PMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IVR's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PMT currently trades 87.8% from its 52-week high vs IVR's 84.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.81 | $9.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.14 | $7.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.8% | +84.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.3 | 44.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
IVR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PMT as "Buy" and IVR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 23.7% upside for PMT (target: $15) vs 12.1% for IVR (target: $9). For income investors, IVR offers the higher dividend yield at 20.08% vs PMT's 13.21%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $9.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +13.2% | +20.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.60 | $1.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.5% |
IVR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PMT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
PMT vs IVR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PMT or IVR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) is the stronger pick with 245.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR). Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (3. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PMT or IVR?
On trailing P/E, Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.
(IVR) is the cheapest at 5. 2x versus PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust at 12. 3x. On forward P/E, Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. is actually cheaper at 3. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PMT or IVR?
Over the past 5 years, PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) delivered a total return of +1.
7%, compared to -47. 7% for Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PMT returned +121. 8% versus IVR's -29. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PMT or IVR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
71β versus Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. 's 0. 78β — meaning IVR is approximately 9% more volatile than PMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 10% for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PMT or IVR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) is pulling ahead at 245.
8% versus -24. 6% for Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. grew EPS 135. 4% year-over-year, compared to -27. 7% for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PMT or IVR?
Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.
(IVR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 8% net margin versus 7. 3% for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust — meaning it keeps 29. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IVR leads at 94. 5% versus 79. 0% for PMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IVR leads at 96. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PMT or IVR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.
(IVR) trades at 3. 7x forward P/E versus 7. 8x for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PMT: 23. 7% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PMT or IVR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (IVR) offers the highest yield at 20. 1%, versus 13. 2% for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT).
09Is PMT or IVR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71), 13. 2% yield, +121. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PMT: +121. 8%, IVR: -29. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PMT and IVR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PMT is a small-cap high-growth stock; IVR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.