Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PN vs DQ vs RUN vs CSIQ

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PN
Skycorp Solar Group Limited

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-88.9%
DQ
Daqo New Energy Corp.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNYSE • CN
Market Cap$1.24B
5Y Perf.+1.4%
RUN
Sunrun Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.24B
5Y Perf.+135.5%
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$1.18B
5Y Perf.+104.4%

PN vs DQ vs RUN vs CSIQ — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PN logoPN
DQ logoDQ
RUN logoRUN
CSIQ logoCSIQ
IndustrySolarSemiconductorsSolarSolar
Market Cap$10M$1.24B$3.24B$1.18B
Revenue (TTM)$63M$569M$3.17B$5.60B
Net Income (TTM)$-3M$-187M$568M$-104M
Gross Margin10.0%-34.4%23.5%18.3%
Operating Margin-4.0%-54.4%-1.8%0.1%
Forward P/E22.8x
Total Debt$6M$0.00$14.89B$7.68B
Cash & Equiv.$9M$980M$1.24B$1.91B

PN vs DQ vs RUN vs CSIQLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PN
DQ
RUN
CSIQ
StockMar 25May 26Return
Skycorp Solar Group… (PN)10011.1-88.9%
Daqo New Energy Cor… (DQ)100101.4+1.4%
Sunrun Inc. (RUN)100235.5+135.5%
Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ)100204.4+104.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PN vs DQ vs RUN vs CSIQ

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: RUN leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Skycorp Solar Group Limited is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. CSIQ also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PN
Skycorp Solar Group Limited
The Defensive Pick

PN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 25.9%, current ratio 1.59x
  • Beta 0.34 vs RUN's 2.89, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
DQ
Daqo New Energy Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

DQ is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 271.0% 10Y total return vs RUN's 86.7%
  • Beta 1.80, current ratio 5.41x
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
RUN
Sunrun Inc.
The Income Pick

RUN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.89
  • Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
  • 45.1% revenue growth vs DQ's -35.3%
  • 17.9% margin vs DQ's -32.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.
The Momentum Pick

CSIQ is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +97.1% vs PN's -84.5%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRUN logoRUN45.1% revenue growth vs DQ's -35.3%
Quality / MarginsRUN logoRUN17.9% margin vs DQ's -32.9%
Stability / SafetyPN logoPNBeta 0.34 vs RUN's 2.89, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CSIQ logoCSIQ+97.1% vs PN's -84.5%
Efficiency (ROA)RUN logoRUN2.5% ROA vs PN's -7.0%, ROIC -0.5% vs -10.8%

PN vs DQ vs RUN vs CSIQ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PNSkycorp Solar Group Limited
FY 2025
Consolidated
99.4%$63M
Other Segment
0.6%$385,947
DQDaqo New Energy Corp.
FY 2017
Product
100.0%$353M
RUNSunrun Inc.
FY 2025
Service
30.8%$1.8B
Customer Agreements
28.9%$1.7B
Product
19.2%$1.1B
Energy Systems
14.9%$878M
Manufactured Product, Other
4.4%$260M
Incentives
1.9%$111M
CSIQCanadian Solar Inc.
FY 2024
Electricity
100.0%$85M

PN vs DQ vs RUN vs CSIQ — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRUNLAGGINGCSIQ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RUN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CSIQ is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.6B annually — 88.4x PN's $63M. RUN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DQ's -32.9%. On growth, RUN holds the edge at +43.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…DQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$63M$569M$3.2B$5.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$128M$541M$284M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$187M$568M-$104M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$203M-$326M-$1.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.0%-34.4%+23.5%+18.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.0%-54.4%-1.8%+0.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.3%-32.9%+17.9%-1.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.7%-35.8%-10.3%-29.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-78.4%+43.2%-20.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-19.3%+2.1%-3.7%
RUN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — PN and DQ and CSIQ each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…DQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
Market CapShares × price$10M$1.2B$3.2B$1.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7M$262M$16.9B$7.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.50x-7.20x8.07x-11.41x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple24.31x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.16x1.87x1.09x0.21x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.43x0.21x0.75x0.28x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.28x
Evenly matched — PN and DQ and CSIQ each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — RUN and CSIQ each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

RUN delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-13 for PN. PN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RUN's 2.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RUN scores 6/9 vs CSIQ's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…DQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-13.1%-3.2%+12.4%-2.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-7.0%-2.9%+2.5%-0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-10.8%-4.1%-0.5%-0.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-11.9%-4.6%-0.6%-0.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93461
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.26x2.99x1.80x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$4M-$980M$13.6B$5.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$980M$1.2B$1.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$0$14.9B$7.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-9.47x-0.02x0.02x
Evenly matched — RUN and CSIQ each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RUN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CSIQ five years ago would be worth $4,461 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $957 for PN. Over the past 12 months, CSIQ leads with a +97.1% total return vs PN's -84.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RUN at -7.1% vs PN's -54.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…DQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-46.8%-38.1%-29.0%-30.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-84.5%+41.3%+86.7%+97.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.4%-58.1%-19.7%-52.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.4%-75.4%-69.8%-55.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.4%+271.0%+86.7%+14.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-54.3%-25.2%-7.1%-21.9%
RUN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PN and RUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PN is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RUN's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RUN currently trades 61.5% from its 52-week high vs PN's 8.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…DQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.34x1.80x2.89x2.23x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$87.40$36.59$22.44$34.59
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.46$12.72$5.38$8.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+8.8%+50.2%+61.5%+51.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.739.149.062.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.0M719K10.4M2.5M
Evenly matched — PN and RUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

RUN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: DQ as "Hold", RUN as "Buy", CSIQ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for CSIQ (target: $29) vs 1.1% for DQ (target: $19).

MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…DQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…RUN logoRUNSunrun Inc.CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.56$18.14$28.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts133633
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+5.9%
RUN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

RUN leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallSunrun Inc. (RUN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PN vs DQ vs RUN vs CSIQ: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PN or DQ or RUN or CSIQ a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 3% for Daqo New Energy Corp. (DQ). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sunrun Inc. (RUN) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — PN or DQ or RUN or CSIQ?

Over the past 5 years, Canadian Solar Inc.

(CSIQ) delivered a total return of -55. 4%, compared to -90. 4% for Skycorp Solar Group Limited (PN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DQ returned +271. 0% versus PN's -90. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — PN or DQ or RUN or CSIQ?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Skycorp Solar Group Limited (PN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

34β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning RUN is approximately 749% more volatile than PN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skycorp Solar Group Limited (PN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 3% for Sunrun Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — PN or DQ or RUN or CSIQ?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus -35. 3% for Daqo New Energy Corp. (DQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to -747. 1% for Skycorp Solar Group Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, RUN leads at 8. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — PN or DQ or RUN or CSIQ?

Sunrun Inc.

(RUN) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -25. 6% for Daqo New Energy Corp. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSIQ leads at -0. 5% versus -40. 6% for DQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RUN leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is PN or DQ or RUN or CSIQ more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CSIQ: 63.

3% to $28. 88.

07

Which pays a better dividend — PN or DQ or RUN or CSIQ?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is PN or DQ or RUN or CSIQ better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Skycorp Solar Group Limited (PN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

34)). Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PN: -90. 4%, CSIQ: +14. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between PN and DQ and RUN and CSIQ?

These companies operate in different sectors (PN (Energy) and DQ (Technology) and RUN (Energy) and CSIQ (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PN is a small-cap high-growth stock; DQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSIQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DQ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RUN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSIQ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PN and DQ and RUN and CSIQ on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PN: 27.0% · DQ: -78.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.