Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PN vs JKS vs CSIQ vs DQ

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PN
Skycorp Solar Group Limited

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-88.9%
JKS
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.

Solar

EnergyNYSE • CN
Market Cap$306M
5Y Perf.+25.2%
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$1.18B
5Y Perf.+104.4%
DQ
Daqo New Energy Corp.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNYSE • CN
Market Cap$1.24B
5Y Perf.+1.4%

PN vs JKS vs CSIQ vs DQ — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PN logoPN
JKS logoJKS
CSIQ logoCSIQ
DQ logoDQ
IndustrySolarSolarSolarSemiconductors
Market Cap$10M$306M$1.18B$1.24B
Revenue (TTM)$63M$75.16B$5.60B$569M
Net Income (TTM)$-3M$-2.52B$-104M$-187M
Gross Margin10.0%7.3%18.3%-34.4%
Operating Margin-4.0%-8.2%0.1%-54.4%
Total Debt$6M$53.16B$7.68B$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$9M$22.95B$1.91B$980M

PN vs JKS vs CSIQ vs DQLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PN
JKS
CSIQ
DQ
StockMar 25May 26Return
Skycorp Solar Group… (PN)10011.1-88.9%
JinkoSolar Holding … (JKS)100125.2+25.2%
Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ)100204.4+104.4%
Daqo New Energy Cor… (DQ)100101.4+1.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PN vs JKS vs CSIQ vs DQ

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CSIQ leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Skycorp Solar Group Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. JKS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PN
Skycorp Solar Group Limited
The Growth Play

PN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth -7.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 25.9%, current ratio 1.59x
  • Beta 0.34, current ratio 1.59x
  • 27.0% revenue growth vs DQ's -35.3%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
JKS
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.
The Income Pick

JKS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.39, yield 23.5%
  • 40.8% 10Y total return vs DQ's 271.0%
  • 23.5% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.
The Quality Compounder

CSIQ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.

  • -1.9% margin vs DQ's -32.9%
  • +97.1% vs PN's -84.5%
  • -0.7% ROA vs PN's -7.0%, ROIC -0.2% vs -10.8%
Best for: quality and momentum
DQ
Daqo New Energy Corp.
The Secondary Option

DQ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPN logoPN27.0% revenue growth vs DQ's -35.3%
Quality / MarginsCSIQ logoCSIQ-1.9% margin vs DQ's -32.9%
Stability / SafetyPN logoPNBeta 0.34 vs CSIQ's 2.23, lower leverage
DividendsJKS logoJKS23.5% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CSIQ logoCSIQ+97.1% vs PN's -84.5%
Efficiency (ROA)CSIQ logoCSIQ-0.7% ROA vs PN's -7.0%, ROIC -0.2% vs -10.8%

PN vs JKS vs CSIQ vs DQ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PNSkycorp Solar Group Limited
FY 2025
Consolidated
99.4%$63M
Other Segment
0.6%$385,947
JKSJinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.
FY 2025
Sales of Other Solar Materials
100.0%$3.0B
CSIQCanadian Solar Inc.
FY 2024
Electricity
100.0%$85M
DQDaqo New Energy Corp.
FY 2017
Product
100.0%$353M

PN vs JKS vs CSIQ vs DQ — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJKSLAGGINGDQ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CSIQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JKS is the larger business by revenue, generating $75.2B annually — 1187.2x PN's $63M. CSIQ is the more profitable business, keeping -1.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DQ's -32.9%. On growth, CSIQ holds the edge at -20.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…DQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$63M$75.2B$5.6B$569M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$3.8B$284M-$128M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$2.5B-$104M-$187M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0-$1.7B-$203M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.0%+7.3%+18.3%-34.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.0%-8.2%+0.1%-54.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.3%-3.4%-1.9%-32.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.7%-3.5%-29.6%-35.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-34.1%-20.0%-78.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-33.5%-3.7%-19.3%
CSIQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JKS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…DQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…
Market CapShares × price$10M$306M$1.2B$1.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7M$4.7B$7.0B$262M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.50x-0.48x-11.41x-7.20x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.16x0.03x0.21x1.87x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.43x0.07x0.28x0.21x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.28x
JKS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CSIQ leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

CSIQ delivers a -2.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-13 for PN. PN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JKS's 1.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DQ scores 4/9 vs CSIQ's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…DQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-13.1%-7.7%-2.5%-3.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-7.0%-2.0%-0.7%-2.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-10.8%-9.2%-0.2%-4.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-11.9%-10.3%-0.3%-4.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93314
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.26x1.93x1.80x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$4M$30.2B$5.8B-$980M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$23.0B$1.9B$980M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$53.2B$7.7B$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-9.47x-2.92x0.02x
CSIQ leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JKS five years ago would be worth $8,516 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $957 for PN. Over the past 12 months, CSIQ leads with a +97.1% total return vs PN's -84.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JKS at -16.5% vs PN's -54.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…DQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-46.8%-16.5%-30.4%-38.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-84.5%+37.1%+97.1%+41.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.4%-41.7%-52.3%-58.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.4%-14.8%-55.4%-75.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.4%+40.8%+14.4%+271.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-54.3%-16.5%-21.9%-25.2%
JKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PN and JKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PN is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSIQ's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JKS currently trades 73.2% from its 52-week high vs PN's 8.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…DQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.34x1.39x2.23x1.80x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$87.40$31.88$34.59$36.59
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.46$17.41$8.84$12.72
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+8.8%+73.2%+51.1%+50.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.751.462.439.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.0M597K2.5M719K
Evenly matched — PN and JKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: JKS as "Buy", CSIQ as "Buy", DQ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for CSIQ (target: $29) vs 1.1% for DQ (target: $19). JKS is the only dividend payer here at 23.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricPN logoPNSkycorp Solar Gro…JKS logoJKSJinkoSolar Holdin…CSIQ logoCSIQCanadian Solar In…DQ logoDQDaqo New Energy C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$24.00$28.88$18.56
# AnalystsCovering analysts223313
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+23.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$37.37
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%+5.9%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

CSIQ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JKS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallJinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PN vs JKS vs CSIQ vs DQ: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PN or JKS or CSIQ or DQ a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Skycorp Solar Group Limited (PN) is the stronger pick with 27.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 3% for Daqo New Energy Corp. (DQ). Analysts rate JinkoSolar Holding Co. , Ltd. (JKS) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — PN or JKS or CSIQ or DQ?

Over the past 5 years, JinkoSolar Holding Co.

, Ltd. (JKS) delivered a total return of -14. 8%, compared to -90. 4% for Skycorp Solar Group Limited (PN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DQ returned +271. 0% versus PN's -90. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — PN or JKS or CSIQ or DQ?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Skycorp Solar Group Limited (PN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

34β versus Canadian Solar Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning CSIQ is approximately 555% more volatile than PN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skycorp Solar Group Limited (PN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 193% for JinkoSolar Holding Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — PN or JKS or CSIQ or DQ?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Skycorp Solar Group Limited (PN) is pulling ahead at 27.

0% versus -35. 3% for Daqo New Energy Corp. (DQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Daqo New Energy Corp. grew EPS 51. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1540. 3% for JinkoSolar Holding Co. , Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PN leads at 2. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — PN or JKS or CSIQ or DQ?

Canadian Solar Inc.

(CSIQ) is the more profitable company, earning -1. 9% net margin versus -25. 6% for Daqo New Energy Corp. — meaning it keeps -1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSIQ leads at -0. 5% versus -40. 6% for DQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSIQ leads at 18. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — PN or JKS or CSIQ or DQ?

In this comparison, JKS (23.

5% yield) pays a dividend. PN, CSIQ, DQ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is PN or JKS or CSIQ or DQ better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Skycorp Solar Group Limited (PN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

34)). Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PN: -90. 4%, CSIQ: +14. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between PN and JKS and CSIQ and DQ?

These companies operate in different sectors (PN (Energy) and JKS (Energy) and CSIQ (Energy) and DQ (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PN is a small-cap high-growth stock; JKS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CSIQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JKS pays a dividend while PN, CSIQ, DQ do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

JKS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 9.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSIQ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DQ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PN and JKS and CSIQ and DQ on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PN: 27.0% · JKS: -34.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.