Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PNBK vs CTBI vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
PNBK vs CTBI vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $114M | $1.25B | $925.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $61M | $409M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $98M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 53.5% | 66.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -19.1% | 31.0% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 0.7x | 11.3x | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $390M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $186M | $63M | $343.34B |
PNBK vs CTBI vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patriot National Ba… (PNBK) | 100 | 16.4 | -83.6% |
| Community Trust Ban… (CTBI) | 100 | 210.5 | +110.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 352.1 | +252.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PNBK vs CTBI vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PNBK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (0.7x vs 11.3x)
CTBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 2.9%
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 17.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 45.5%, current ratio 0.91x
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 492.1% 10Y total return vs CTBI's 144.3%
- PEG 0.84 vs CTBI's 1.12
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PNBK's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.9% NII/revenue growth vs PNBK's -4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 11.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PNBK's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs PNBK's 1.46 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 31-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.9% vs PNBK's -2.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PNBK's 0.7% |
PNBK vs CTBI vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PNBK vs CTBI vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTBI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 4598.9x PNBK's $61M. CTBI is the more profitable business, keeping 24.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PNBK's -19.2%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $61M | $409M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $133M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $98M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $93M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | +66.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.1% | +31.0% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.2% | +24.0% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.6% | +22.7% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | +7.3% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PNBK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.7x trailing earnings, CTBI trades at a 23% valuation discount to JPM's 16.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.93x vs CTBI's 1.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $114M | $1.2B | $925.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$56M | $1.6B | $1.52T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.04x | 12.70x | 16.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.68x | 11.34x | 14.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.25x | 0.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.97x | 18.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.95x | 3.04x | 3.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 1.45x | 2.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.79x | 9.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CTBI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-14 for PNBK. PNBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTBI scores 7/9 vs PNBK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.5% | +12.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | +1.5% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.8% | +8.2% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.1% | +13.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.46x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$170M | $327M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $186M | $63M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $390M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.42x | 1.00x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $22,668 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,137 for PNBK. Over the past 12 months, CTBI leads with a +41.9% total return vs PNBK's -2.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 34.2% vs PNBK's -52.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.1% | +24.1% | +2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.9% | +41.9% | +24.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.1% | +97.6% | +141.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.6% | +82.6% | +126.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.0% | +144.3% | +492.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.3% | +25.5% | +34.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CTBI and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PNBK's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs PNBK's 48.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 0.71x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.00 | $71.31 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.86 | $49.61 | $266.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.3% | +96.7% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.0 | 56.5 | 63.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 285K | 87K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
CTBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CTBI as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.2% upside for CTBI (target: $76) vs 2.6% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, CTBI offers the higher dividend yield at 2.89% vs JPM's 1.80%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $76.00 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.9% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 31 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.99 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.7% |
CTBI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PNBK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PNBK vs CTBI vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PNBK or CTBI or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the stronger pick with 8. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK). Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (CTBI) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PNBK or CTBI or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the cheapest at 12. 7x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 5x. On forward P/E, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 84x versus Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 12x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PNBK or CTBI or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +126. 7%, compared to -88. 6% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +492. 1% versus PNBK's -92. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PNBK or CTBI or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning PNBK is approximately 105% more volatile than CTBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PNBK or CTBI or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is pulling ahead at 8. 9% versus -4. 0% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 98. 4% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PNBK or CTBI or JPM?
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 0% net margin versus -21. 9% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTBI leads at 31. 0% versus -21. 8% for PNBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTBI leads at 66. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PNBK or CTBI or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 84x versus Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 12x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK) trades at 0. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 14. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CTBI: 10. 2% to $76. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PNBK or CTBI or JPM?
In this comparison, CTBI (2.
9% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. PNBK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PNBK or CTBI or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 8% yield, +492. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +492. 1%, PNBK: -92. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PNBK and CTBI and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PNBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CTBI is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. CTBI, JPM pay a dividend while PNBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.