Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PNRG vs SOC vs CIVI vs TALO vs HAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
PNRG vs SOC vs CIVI vs TALO vs HAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $393M | $1.28B | $2.34B | $2.50B | $33.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $196M | $1M | $4.71B | $1.74B | $22.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $-498M | $638M | $-743M | $1.54B |
| Gross Margin | 25.4% | -61.2% | 43.9% | 2.3% | 15.3% |
| Operating Margin | 16.8% | -367.6% | 31.1% | -24.9% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 7.9x | 6.8x | — | 17.1x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $0.00 | $4.49B | $1.24B | $8.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $98M | $76M | $363M | $2.21B |
PNRG vs SOC vs CIVI vs TALO vs HAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PrimeEnergy Resourc… (PNRG) | 100 | 565.5 | +465.5% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
| Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) | 100 | 134.0 | +34.0% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 203.6 | +103.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PNRG vs SOC vs CIVI vs TALO vs HAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PNRG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 90.0%, EPS growth 103.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 41.6%
- 431.2% 10Y total return vs SOC's 32.5%
- PEG 0.12 vs CIVI's 0.32
- 90.0% revenue growth vs TALO's -9.8%
SOC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CIVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (6.8x vs 17.1x)
- 13.6% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
- 18.2% yield, vs HAL's 1.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, TALO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HAL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.48, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.48 vs SOC's 1.42
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 90.0% revenue growth vs TALO's -9.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.8x vs 17.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs SOC's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | 18.2% yield, vs HAL's 1.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.1% vs SOC's -38.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.6% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 28.5% vs -44.6% |
PNRG vs SOC vs CIVI vs TALO vs HAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PNRG vs SOC vs CIVI vs TALO vs HAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CIVI leads in 2 of 6 categories
PNRG leads 2 • SOC leads 0 • TALO leads 0 • HAL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.2B annually — 17442.2x SOC's $1M. CIVI is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, HAL holds the edge at -0.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $196M | $1M | $4.7B | $1.7B | $22.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $120M | -$454M | $3.4B | $437M | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | -$498M | $638M | -$743M | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | -$611M | $934M | $489M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | -61.2% | +43.9% | +2.3% | +15.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | -367.6% | +31.1% | -24.9% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | -391.5% | +13.6% | -42.7% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | -480.4% | +19.8% | +28.1% | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.0% | — | -8.1% | -7.9% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.2% | -5.4% | -33.9% | -29.4% | +129.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CIVI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 88% valuation discount to HAL's 26.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PNRG offers better value at 0.14x vs CIVI's 0.15x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $393M | $1.3B | $2.3B | $2.5B | $33.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $398M | $1.2B | $6.8B | $3.4B | $39.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.89x | -3.07x | 3.24x | -5.32x | 26.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.47x | 7.88x | 6.75x | — | 17.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.14x | — | 0.15x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.73x | — | 1.89x | 3.14x | 11.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.68x | — | 0.45x | 1.41x | 1.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.97x | 2.36x | 0.41x | 1.21x | 3.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 2.61x | 5.51x | 19.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PNRG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HAL delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. PNRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAL's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNRG scores 8/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.8% | -113.8% | +9.5% | -33.2% | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.6% | -28.9% | +4.2% | -13.2% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +28.5% | -44.6% | +10.8% | -2.3% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +27.6% | -37.5% | +12.1% | -2.0% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | — | 0.68x | 0.57x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$98M | $4.4B | $879M | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $98M | $76M | $363M | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $0 | $4.5B | $1.2B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 14.38x | -3.47x | 2.80x | -2.36x | 9.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PNRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PNRG five years ago would be worth $57,783 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,118 for TALO. Over the past 12 months, HAL leads with a +100.1% total return vs SOC's -38.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PNRG at 40.1% vs CIVI's -16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.5% | +9.5% | -1.5% | +33.2% | +35.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.6% | -38.7% | +5.5% | +87.1% | +100.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +175.1% | +26.6% | -41.7% | +13.9% | +39.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +477.8% | +32.7% | +23.5% | +21.2% | +87.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +431.2% | +32.5% | -86.2% | -58.8% | +18.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.1% | +8.2% | -16.5% | +4.4% | +11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PNRG and TALO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TALO is the less volatile stock with a -0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PNRG currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 1.42x | 1.06x | -0.05x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $249.50 | $35.00 | $37.45 | $17.00 | $42.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $126.40 | $3.72 | $25.38 | $7.55 | $19.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +36.7% | +73.1% | +88.2% | +93.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 42.5 | 54.8 | 48.4 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 68K | 5.2M | 22.4M | 2.2M | 14.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CIVI and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SOC as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", TALO as "Buy", HAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 117.9% upside for SOC (target: $28) vs -0.5% for HAL (target: $40). For income investors, CIVI offers the higher dividend yield at 18.19% vs HAL's 1.73%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $28.00 | $31.00 | $15.25 | $39.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 16 | 13 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +18.2% | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $4.98 | — | $0.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.4% | 0.0% | +18.3% | +4.8% | +3.0% |
CIVI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PNRG leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
PNRG vs SOC vs CIVI vs TALO vs HAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PNRG or SOC or CIVI or TALO or HAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation (PNRG) is the stronger pick with 90.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 8% for Talos Energy Inc. (TALO). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PNRG or SOC or CIVI or TALO or HAL?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Halliburton Company at 26. 6x. On forward P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation wins at 0. 12x versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 0. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PNRG or SOC or CIVI or TALO or HAL?
Over the past 5 years, PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation (PNRG) delivered a total return of +477.
8%, compared to +21. 2% for Talos Energy Inc. (TALO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PNRG returned +431. 2% versus CIVI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PNRG or SOC or CIVI or TALO or HAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Talos Energy Inc.
(TALO) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 05β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 42β — meaning SOC is approximately -3056% more volatile than TALO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation (PNRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 77% for Halliburton Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PNRG or SOC or CIVI or TALO or HAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation (PNRG) is pulling ahead at 90.
0% versus -9. 8% for Talos Energy Inc. (TALO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation grew EPS 103. 8% year-over-year, compared to -555. 8% for Talos Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PNRG or SOC or CIVI or TALO or HAL?
PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation (PNRG) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
7% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 23. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PNRG leads at 29. 4% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CIVI leads at 41. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PNRG or SOC or CIVI or TALO or HAL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation (PNRG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 0. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Halliburton Company — 10. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 117. 9% to $28. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PNRG or SOC or CIVI or TALO or HAL?
In this comparison, CIVI (18.
2% yield), HAL (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. PNRG, SOC, TALO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PNRG or SOC or CIVI or TALO or HAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
48), 1. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAL: +18. 1%, SOC: +32. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PNRG and SOC and CIVI and TALO and HAL?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PNRG is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; TALO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HAL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CIVI, HAL pay a dividend while PNRG, SOC, TALO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.