POLA
Polar Power, Inc.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$5M
5Y Perf.-94.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
POLA vs ACHR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ACHR
Archer Aviation Inc.
Aerospace & Defense
Market Cap$4.82B
5Y Perf.-35.6%
POLA vs ACHR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | POLA | ACHR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $5M | $4.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $300K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-618M |
| Gross Margin | -30.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -95.9% | -2431.0% |
| Total Debt | $7M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $498K | $1.02B |
POLA vs ACHR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
POLA
ACHR
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polar Power, Inc. (POLA) | 100 | 5.6 | -94.4% |
| Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) | 100 | 64.4 | -35.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: POLA vs ACHR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: POLA leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Archer Aviation Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
POLA
Polar Power, Inc.
The Income Pick
POLA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.71
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 81.3%, current ratio 1.82x
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 1.82x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ACHR
Archer Aviation Inc.
The Growth Play
ACHR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth 30.3%
- -35.0% 10Y total return vs POLA's -97.0%
- -32.9% ROA vs POLA's -70.2%, ROIC -89.6% vs -18.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | POLA | -8.7% revenue growth vs ACHR's -13.8% |
| Quality / Margins | POLA | -104.1% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K% |
| Stability / Safety | POLA | Beta 0.71 vs ACHR's 2.95 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | POLA | -3.6% vs ACHR's -26.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ACHR | -32.9% ROA vs POLA's -70.2%, ROIC -89.6% vs -18.7% |
POLA vs ACHR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPOLALAGGINGACHR
ACHRArcher Aviation Inc.
2leads
POLAPolar Power, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ACHRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
POLA3/3
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
POLA2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ACHR4/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ACHR4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
POLA leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
POLA is the larger business by revenue, generating $8M annually — 27.8x ACHR's $300,000. POLA is the more profitable business, keeping -104.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHR's -2060.7%.
| Metric | POLAPolar Power, Inc. | ACHRArcher Aviation I… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $300,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$709M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$618M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$971,000 | -$512M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -30.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -95.9% | -2431.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -104.1% | -2060.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.7% | -1705.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -74.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +43.5% |
POLA leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
POLA leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | POLAPolar Power, Inc. | ACHRArcher Aviation I… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $3.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.02x | -6.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 9999.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.56x | 1.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
POLA leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACHR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACHR delivers a -37.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-38 in annual profit, vs $-3 for POLA. ACHR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to POLA's 0.81x.
| Metric | POLAPolar Power, Inc. | ACHRArcher Aviation I… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.0% | -37.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -70.2% | -32.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.7% | -89.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -36.4% | -44.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$979M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $498,000 | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.63x | — |
ACHR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACHR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACHR five years ago would be worth $6,572 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $292 for POLA. Over the past 12 months, POLA leads with a -3.6% total return vs ACHR's -26.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACHR at 44.7% vs POLA's -36.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | POLAPolar Power, Inc. | ACHRArcher Aviation I… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.6% | -20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.6% | -26.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.0% | +202.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.1% | -34.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.0% | -35.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.2% | +44.7% |
ACHR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — POLA and ACHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
POLA is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACHR's 2.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACHR currently trades 44.3% from its 52-week high vs POLA's 32.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | POLAPolar Power, Inc. | ACHRArcher Aviation I… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 2.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.75 | $14.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.31 | $4.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.9% | +44.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 27.8M |
Evenly matched — POLA and ACHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | POLAPolar Power, Inc. | ACHRArcher Aviation I… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
POLA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ACHR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallPolar Power, Inc. (POLA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
POLA vs ACHR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is POLA or ACHR a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Archer Aviation Inc.
(ACHR) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — POLA or ACHR?
Over the past 5 years, Archer Aviation Inc.
(ACHR) delivered a total return of -34. 3%, compared to -97. 1% for Polar Power, Inc. (POLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACHR returned -35. 0% versus POLA's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — POLA or ACHR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Polar Power, Inc.
(POLA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Archer Aviation Inc. 's 2. 95β — meaning ACHR is approximately 317% more volatile than POLA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 81% for Polar Power, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — POLA or ACHR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Archer Aviation Inc.
grew EPS 30. 3% year-over-year, compared to -272. 0% for Polar Power, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — POLA or ACHR?
Polar Power, Inc.
(POLA) is the more profitable company, earning -33. 5% net margin versus -2060. 7% for Archer Aviation Inc. — meaning it keeps -33. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: POLA leads at -31. 3% versus -2431. 0% for ACHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — POLA leads at 9. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — POLA or ACHR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is POLA or ACHR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Polar Power, Inc.
(POLA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71)). Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a higher beta of 2. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (POLA: -97. 0%, ACHR: -35. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between POLA and ACHR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.