PONY
Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares
Rental & Leasing Services
Market Cap$2.87B
5Y Perf.-37.4%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisPONY
INVZ
MBLY
LAZR
OUST
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PONY vs INVZ vs MBLY vs LAZR vs OUST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
INVZ
Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$137M
5Y Perf.-18.8%
MBLY
Mobileye Global Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$7.61B
5Y Perf.-48.3%
LAZR
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-99.1%
OUST
Ouster, Inc.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$2.53B
5Y Perf.+302.8%
PONY vs INVZ vs MBLY vs LAZR vs OUST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  PONY |  INVZ |  MBLY |  LAZR |  OUST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $2.87B | $137M | $7.61B | $2M | $2.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90M | $45M | $2.01B | $66M | $185M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-134M | $-81M | $-4.11B | $-378M | $-56M |
| Gross Margin | 15.7% | 9.7% | 48.3% | — | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | -289.8% | -178.8% | -209.5% | -449.6% | -37.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 33.7x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $15M | $65M | $0.00 | $117M | $17M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $295M | $9M | $1.84B | $20M | $67M |
PONY vs INVZ vs MBLY vs LAZR vs OUST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PONY
INVZ
MBLY
LAZR
OUST
| Stock | Nov 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pony AI Inc. Americ… (PONY) | 100 | 62.6 | -37.4% |
| Innoviz Technologie… (INVZ) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) | 100 | 51.7 | -48.3% |
| Luminar Technologie… (LAZR) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| Ouster, Inc. (OUST) | 100 | 402.8 | +302.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PONY vs INVZ vs MBLY vs LAZR vs OUST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PONY and OUST are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Ouster, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. INVZ and MBLY also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PONY
Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares
The Long-Run Compounder
PONY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -32.1% 10Y total return vs OUST's -59.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.32, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 13.67x
- 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- -11.4% ROA vs LAZR's -164.4%, ROIC -20.9% vs -140.1%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
INVZ
Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
The Growth Play
INVZ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 127.0%, EPS growth 40.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 109.1%
- 127.0% revenue growth vs LAZR's -12.4%
Best for: growth exposure
MBLY
Mobileye Global Inc.
The Income Pick
MBLY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.09
- Beta 2.09, current ratio 6.10x
- Beta 2.09 vs OUST's 3.93
Best for: income & stability and defensive
LAZR
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick
Among these 5 stocks, LAZR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
OUST
Ouster, Inc.
The Quality Compounder
OUST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and momentum is your priority.
- -30.1% margin vs LAZR's -5.7%
- +104.3% vs LAZR's -98.0%
Best for: quality and momentum
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  INVZ | 127.0% revenue growth vs LAZR's -12.4% |
| Quality / Margins |  OUST | -30.1% margin vs LAZR's -5.7% |
| Stability / Safety |  MBLY | Beta 2.09 vs OUST's 3.93 |
| Dividends |  PONY | 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | OUST | +104.3% vs LAZR's -98.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PONY | -11.4% ROA vs LAZR's -164.4%, ROIC -20.9% vs -140.1% |
PONY vs INVZ vs MBLY vs LAZR vs OUST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2024
PONY vs INVZ vs MBLY vs LAZR vs OUST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMBLYLAGGINGLAZR
Who Leads Where
OUST leads in 2 of 6 categories
MBLY leads 2 • PONY leads 0 • INVZ leads 0 • LAZR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓LAZRLuminar Technologies,…
0leads
INVZInnoviz Technologies …
0leads
PONYPony AI Inc. American…
0leads
OUSTOuster, Inc.
2leads
MBLYMobileye Global Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs OUSTvs PONYMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
OUST4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MBLY4/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
OUST4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
MBLY1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OUST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MBLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 44.9x INVZ's $45M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -30.1% (OUST) to -5.7% (LAZR). On growth, OUST holds the edge at +48.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PONYPony AI Inc. Amer… | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | MBLYMobileye Global I… |  LAZRLuminar Technolog… | OUSTOuster, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90M | $45M | $2.0B | $66M | $185M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$256M | -$74M | -$3.8B | -$297M | -$60M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$134M | -$81M | -$4.1B | -$378M | -$56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$209M | -$47M | $482M | -$200M | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +9.7% | +48.3% | — | +49.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -178.8% | -2.1% | -4.5% | -37.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -148.5% | -181.5% | -2.0% | -5.7% | -30.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -105.2% | +23.9% | -3.0% | -37.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.3% | -59.0% | +27.4% | -43.3% | +48.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +110.8% | -76.2% | -35.0% | -98.4% | +33.3% |
OUST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MBLY and LAZR and OUST each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PONYPony AI Inc. Amer… | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | MBLYMobileye Global I… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… | OUSTOuster, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $137M | $7.6B | $2M | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $193M | $5.8B | $454M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.29x | -1.82x | -19.46x | -0.01x | -37.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 33.74x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 74.94x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 31.83x | 2.48x | 4.02x | 0.03x | 14.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.81x | 1.59x | 0.64x | — | 8.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 14.54x | — | — |
Evenly matched — MBLY and LAZR and OUST each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MBLY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PONY delivers a -12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-12 in annual profit, vs $-102 for INVZ. PONY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INVZ's 0.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OUST scores 6/9 vs LAZR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | PONYPony AI Inc. Amer… | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | MBLYMobileye Global I… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… | OUSTOuster, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.4% | -101.6% | -37.3% | — | -22.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.4% | -57.8% | -35.5% | -164.4% | -15.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -20.9% | -46.9% | -3.2% | -140.1% | -30.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.4% | -64.1% | -3.6% | -198.6% | -31.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.83x | — | — | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$280M | $56M | -$1.8B | $96M | -$50M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $295M | $9M | $1.8B | $20M | $67M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $65M | $0 | $117M | $17M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -46.35x | — | -6.16x | — |
MBLY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OUST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PONY five years ago would be worth $6,792 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for LAZR. Over the past 12 months, OUST leads with a +104.3% total return vs LAZR's -98.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OUST at 89.8% vs LAZR's -91.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PONYPony AI Inc. Amer… | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | MBLYMobileye Global I… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… | OUSTOuster, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -49.3% | -35.9% | -16.8% | -24.1% | +70.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.8% | -35.7% | -41.2% | -98.0% | +104.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | -78.3% | -76.6% | -99.9% | +583.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | -93.8% | -67.8% | -100.0% | -64.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | -93.7% | -67.8% | -100.0% | -59.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.1% | -39.9% | -38.4% | -91.5% | +89.8% |
OUST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MBLY and OUST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MBLY is the less volatile stock with a 2.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OUST's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OUST currently trades 80.6% from its 52-week high vs LAZR's 1.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PONYPony AI Inc. Amer… | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | MBLYMobileye Global I… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… | OUSTOuster, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.32x | 2.47x | 2.09x | 2.19x | 3.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.92 | $2.54 | $20.18 | $3.86 | $49.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.95 | $0.58 | $6.47 | $0.05 | $16.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.7% | +24.3% | +46.3% | +1.6% | +80.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 41.0 | 49.0 | 36.2 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.3M | 2.7M | 6.0M | 418K | 4.0M |
Evenly matched — MBLY and OUST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
MBLY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PONY as "Buy", INVZ as "Buy", MBLY as "Buy", OUST as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 871.7% upside for INVZ (target: $6) vs 40.7% for OUST (target: $56). PONY is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | PONYPony AI Inc. Amer… | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | MBLYMobileye Global I… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… | OUSTOuster, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $6.00 | $13.32 | — | $56.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 5 | 26 | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MBLY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
OUST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MBLY leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallMobileye Global Inc. (MBLY)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PONY vs INVZ vs MBLY vs LAZR vs OUST: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PONY or INVZ or MBLY or LAZR or OUST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) is the stronger pick with 127. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 4% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). Analysts rate Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PONY or INVZ or MBLY or LAZR or OUST?
Over the past 5 years, Pony AI Inc.
American Depositary Shares (PONY) delivered a total return of -32. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PONY returned -32. 1% versus LAZR's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PONY or INVZ or MBLY or LAZR or OUST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mobileye Global Inc.
(MBLY) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 09β versus Ouster, Inc. 's 3. 93β — meaning OUST is approximately 88% more volatile than MBLY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 83% for Innoviz Technologies Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PONY or INVZ or MBLY or LAZR or OUST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) is pulling ahead at 127. 0% versus -12. 4% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mobileye Global Inc. grew EPS 87. 4% year-over-year, compared to 27. 2% for Luminar Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INVZ leads at 109. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PONY or INVZ or MBLY or LAZR or OUST?
Mobileye Global Inc.
(MBLY) is the more profitable company, earning -20. 7% net margin versus -572. 8% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps -20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MBLY leads at -23. 2% versus -449. 6% for LAZR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OUST leads at 49. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PONY or INVZ or MBLY or LAZR or OUST more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INVZ: 871.
7% to $6. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — PONY or INVZ or MBLY or LAZR or OUST?
In this comparison, PONY (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. INVZ, MBLY, LAZR, OUST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is PONY or INVZ or MBLY or LAZR or OUST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pony AI Inc.
American Depositary Shares (PONY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR) carries a higher beta of 2. 19 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PONY: -32. 1%, LAZR: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PONY and INVZ and MBLY and LAZR and OUST?
These companies operate in different sectors (PONY (Industrials) and INVZ (Consumer Cyclical) and MBLY (Consumer Cyclical) and LAZR (Consumer Cyclical) and OUST (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PONY is a small-cap high-growth stock; INVZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; MBLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OUST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.