Rental & Leasing Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PONY vs LIDR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
PONY vs LIDR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $2.87B | $74M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90M | $270K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-134M | $-34M |
| Gross Margin | 15.7% | -144.1% |
| Operating Margin | -289.8% | -125.8% |
| Total Debt | $15M | $235K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $295M | $43M |
PONY vs LIDR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pony AI Inc. Americ… (PONY) | 100 | 62.6 | -37.4% |
| AEye, Inc. (LIDR) | 100 | 141.6 | +41.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PONY vs LIDR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PONY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.3%, EPS growth 85.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
- -32.1% 10Y total return vs LIDR's -99.5%
- 20.3% revenue growth vs LIDR's 15.3%
LIDR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 2.51
- Lower volatility, beta 2.51, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 10.46x
- Beta 2.51, current ratio 10.46x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.3% revenue growth vs LIDR's 15.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -148.5% margin vs LIDR's -127.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.51 vs PONY's 3.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +86.2% vs PONY's -35.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -11.4% ROA vs LIDR's -48.5%, ROIC -20.9% vs -100.7% |
PONY vs LIDR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PONY vs LIDR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PONY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PONY is the larger business by revenue, generating $90M annually — 333.8x LIDR's $270,000. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -148.5% (PONY) to -127.0% (LIDR). On growth, LIDR holds the edge at +57.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90M | $270,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$256M | -$34M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$134M | -$34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$209M | -$29M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | -144.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -125.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -148.5% | -127.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -106.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.3% | +57.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +110.8% | -63.6% |
Valuation Metrics
PONY leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $74M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $31M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.29x | -1.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 31.83x | 318.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.81x | 0.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PONY leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PONY delivers a -12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-12 in annual profit, vs $-56 for LIDR. LIDR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PONY's 0.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIDR scores 5/9 vs PONY's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.4% | -56.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.4% | -48.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -20.9% | -100.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.4% | -64.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$280M | -$43M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $295M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $235,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -80.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PONY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PONY five years ago would be worth $6,792 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $53 for LIDR. Over the past 12 months, LIDR leads with a +86.2% total return vs PONY's -35.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PONY at -12.1% vs LIDR's -33.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -49.3% | -24.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.8% | +86.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | -70.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | -99.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | -99.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.1% | -33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PONY and LIDR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIDR is the less volatile stock with a 2.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PONY's 3.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PONY currently trades 32.7% from its 52-week high vs LIDR's 24.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.32x | 2.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.92 | $6.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.95 | $0.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.7% | +24.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 36.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.3M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PONY as "Buy" and LIDR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 650.0% upside for LIDR (target: $12) vs 182.2% for PONY (target: $23). PONY is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $12.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PONY leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
PONY vs LIDR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PONY or LIDR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pony AI Inc.
American Depositary Shares (PONY) is the stronger pick with 20. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 3% for AEye, Inc. (LIDR). Analysts rate Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PONY or LIDR?
Over the past 5 years, Pony AI Inc.
American Depositary Shares (PONY) delivered a total return of -32. 1%, compared to -99. 5% for AEye, Inc. (LIDR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PONY returned -32. 1% versus LIDR's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PONY or LIDR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AEye, Inc.
(LIDR) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 51β versus Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares's 3. 32β — meaning PONY is approximately 33% more volatile than LIDR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AEye, Inc. (LIDR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 1% for Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PONY or LIDR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pony AI Inc.
American Depositary Shares (PONY) is pulling ahead at 20. 3% versus 15. 3% for AEye, Inc. (LIDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares grew EPS 85. 4% year-over-year, compared to 79. 9% for AEye, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PONY leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PONY or LIDR?
Pony AI Inc.
American Depositary Shares (PONY) is the more profitable company, earning -148. 9% net margin versus -145. 7% for AEye, Inc. — meaning it keeps -148. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PONY leads at -289. 8% versus -136. 2% for LIDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PONY leads at 15. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PONY or LIDR?
In this comparison, PONY (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. LIDR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is PONY or LIDR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pony AI Inc.
American Depositary Shares (PONY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. AEye, Inc. (LIDR) carries a higher beta of 2. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PONY: -32. 1%, LIDR: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PONY and LIDR?
These companies operate in different sectors (PONY (Industrials) and LIDR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.