Rental & Leasing Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PONY vs LIDR vs JPM vs MBLY vs LAZR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Banks - Diversified
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
PONY vs LIDR vs JPM vs MBLY vs LAZR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Auto - Parts | Banks - Diversified | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $2.87B | $74M | $896.00B | $7.61B | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90M | $270K | $280.33B | $2.01B | $66M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-134M | $-34M | $57.05B | $-4.11B | $-378M |
| Gross Margin | 15.7% | -144.1% | 60.0% | 48.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -289.8% | -125.8% | 25.9% | -209.5% | -449.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 14.4x | 33.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $15M | $235K | $942.38B | $0.00 | $117M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $295M | $43M | $343.34B | $1.84B | $20M |
PONY vs LIDR vs JPM vs MBLY vs LAZR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pony AI Inc. Americ… (PONY) | 100 | 62.6 | -37.4% |
| AEye, Inc. (LIDR) | 100 | 141.6 | +41.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 128.4 | +28.4% |
| Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) | 100 | 51.7 | -48.3% |
| Luminar Technologie… (LAZR) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PONY vs LIDR vs JPM vs MBLY vs LAZR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PONY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.3%, EPS growth 85.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
- 20.3% revenue growth vs LAZR's -12.4%
LIDR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +86.2% vs LAZR's -98.0%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs PONY's -32.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, current ratio 0.52x
- Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
MBLY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, LAZR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.3% revenue growth vs LAZR's -12.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs LIDR's -127.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs PONY's 3.32 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs PONY's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +86.2% vs LAZR's -98.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs LAZR's -164.4%, ROIC 4.5% vs -140.1% |
PONY vs LIDR vs JPM vs MBLY vs LAZR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PONY vs LIDR vs JPM vs MBLY vs LAZR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 6 of 6 categories
PONY leads 0 • LIDR leads 0 • MBLY leads 0 • LAZR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1038270.4x LIDR's $270,000. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIDR's -127.0%. On growth, LIDR holds the edge at +57.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90M | $270,000 | $280.3B | $2.0B | $66M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$256M | -$34M | $81.4B | -$3.8B | -$297M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$134M | -$34M | $57.0B | -$4.1B | -$378M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$209M | -$29M | $100.9B | $482M | -$200M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | -144.1% | +60.0% | +48.3% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -125.8% | +25.9% | -2.1% | -4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -148.5% | -127.0% | +20.4% | -2.0% | -5.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -106.7% | +36.0% | +23.9% | -3.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.3% | +57.8% | — | +27.4% | -43.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +110.8% | -63.6% | +16.0% | -35.0% | -98.4% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 18.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MBLY's 74.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $74M | $896.0B | $7.6B | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $31M | $1.50T | $5.8B | $454M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.29x | -1.78x | 16.00x | -19.46x | -0.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 14.40x | 33.74x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 18.36x | 74.94x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 31.83x | 318.04x | 3.20x | 4.02x | 0.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.81x | 0.74x | 2.47x | 0.64x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.88x | 14.54x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-56 for LIDR. LIDR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIDR scores 5/9 vs LAZR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.4% | -56.2% | +15.9% | -37.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.4% | -48.5% | +1.3% | -35.5% | -164.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -20.9% | -100.7% | +4.5% | -3.2% | -140.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.4% | -64.7% | +8.9% | -3.6% | -198.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.00x | 2.60x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$280M | -$43M | $599.0B | -$1.8B | $96M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $295M | $43M | $343.3B | $1.8B | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $235,000 | $942.4B | $0 | $117M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -80.57x | 0.74x | — | -6.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for LAZR. Over the past 12 months, LIDR leads with a +86.2% total return vs LAZR's -98.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs LAZR's -91.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -49.3% | -24.2% | -0.5% | -16.8% | -24.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.8% | +86.2% | +21.8% | -41.2% | -98.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | -70.4% | +138.2% | -76.6% | -99.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | -99.5% | +118.2% | -67.8% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | -99.5% | +465.8% | -67.8% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.1% | -33.4% | +33.6% | -38.4% | -91.5% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PONY's 3.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs LAZR's 1.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.32x | 2.51x | 0.94x | 2.09x | 2.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.92 | $6.44 | $337.25 | $20.18 | $3.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.95 | $0.71 | $262.71 | $6.47 | $0.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.7% | +24.8% | +95.1% | +46.3% | +1.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 36.7 | 59.1 | 49.0 | 36.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.3M | 3.4M | 7.0M | 6.0M | 418K |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PONY as "Buy", LIDR as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", MBLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 650.0% upside for LIDR (target: $12) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs PONY's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $12.00 | $339.75 | $13.32 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 4 | 61 | 26 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — | +1.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 15 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | — | $5.95 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +1.3% | 0.0% |
JPM leads in 6 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
PONY vs LIDR vs JPM vs MBLY vs LAZR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PONY or LIDR or JPM or MBLY or LAZR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pony AI Inc.
American Depositary Shares (PONY) is the stronger pick with 20. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 4% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PONY or LIDR or JPM or MBLY or LAZR?
On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PONY or LIDR or JPM or MBLY or LAZR?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus LAZR's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PONY or LIDR or JPM or MBLY or LAZR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares's 3. 32β — meaning PONY is approximately 252% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AEye, Inc. (LIDR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PONY or LIDR or JPM or MBLY or LAZR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pony AI Inc.
American Depositary Shares (PONY) is pulling ahead at 20. 3% versus -12. 4% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mobileye Global Inc. grew EPS 87. 4% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LAZR leads at 17. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PONY or LIDR or JPM or MBLY or LAZR?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -145. 7% for AEye, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -136. 2% for LIDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PONY or LIDR or JPM or MBLY or LAZR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 33. 7x for Mobileye Global Inc. — 19. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LIDR: 650. 0% to $12. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PONY or LIDR or JPM or MBLY or LAZR?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield), PONY (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. LIDR, MBLY, LAZR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PONY or LIDR or JPM or MBLY or LAZR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR) carries a higher beta of 2. 19 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, LAZR: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PONY and LIDR and JPM and MBLY and LAZR?
These companies operate in different sectors (PONY (Industrials) and LIDR (Consumer Cyclical) and JPM (Financial Services) and MBLY (Consumer Cyclical) and LAZR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PONY is a small-cap high-growth stock; LIDR is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; MBLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM pays a dividend while PONY, LIDR, MBLY, LAZR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.