Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PONY logo
PONY
OUST logo
OUST
KO logo
KO
MBLY logo
MBLY
INVZ logo
INVZ
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PONY vs OUST vs KO vs MBLY vs INVZ

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PONY
Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares

Rental & Leasing Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$2.87B
5Y Perf.-37.4%
OUST
Ouster, Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.53B
5Y Perf.+302.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+28.9%
MBLY
Mobileye Global Inc.

Auto - Parts

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$7.61B
5Y Perf.-48.3%
INVZ
Innoviz Technologies Ltd.

Auto - Parts

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$137M
5Y Perf.-18.8%

PONY vs OUST vs KO vs MBLY vs INVZ — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PONY logoPONY
OUST logoOUST
KO logoKO
MBLY logoMBLY
INVZ logoINVZ
IndustryRental & Leasing ServicesHardware, Equipment & PartsBeverages - Non-AlcoholicAuto - PartsAuto - Parts
Market Cap$2.87B$2.53B$355.61B$7.61B$137M
Revenue (TTM)$90M$185M$49.28B$2.01B$45M
Net Income (TTM)$-134M$-56M$13.70B$-4.11B$-81M
Gross Margin15.7%49.0%61.7%48.3%9.7%
Operating Margin-289.8%-37.4%29.3%-209.5%-178.8%
Forward P/E25.3x33.7x
Total Debt$15M$17M$45.49B$0.00$65M
Cash & Equiv.$295M$67M$10.27B$1.84B$9M

PONY vs OUST vs KO vs MBLY vs INVZLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PONY
OUST
KO
MBLY
INVZ
StockNov 24Jun 26Return
Pony AI Inc. Americ… (PONY)10062.6-37.4%
Ouster, Inc. (OUST)100402.8+302.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100128.9+28.9%
Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY)10051.7-48.3%
Innoviz Technologie… (INVZ)10081.2-18.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PONY vs OUST vs KO vs MBLY vs INVZ

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Ouster, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. MBLY and INVZ also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
PONY
Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares
The Defensive Pick

PONY is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 3.32, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 13.67x
  • Beta 3.32, yield 0.2%, current ratio 13.67x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
OUST
Ouster, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

OUST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +104.3% vs MBLY's -41.2%
Best for: momentum
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
  • 121.1% 10Y total return vs PONY's -32.1%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 27.8% margin vs MBLY's -204.0%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
MBLY
Mobileye Global Inc.
The Defensive Choice

MBLY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 2.09 vs OUST's 3.93
Best for: stability
INVZ
Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
The Growth Play

INVZ is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 127.0%, EPS growth 40.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 109.1%
  • 127.0% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthINVZ logoINVZ127.0% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueKO logoKOBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs MBLY's -204.0%
Stability / SafetyMBLY logoMBLYBeta 2.09 vs OUST's 3.93
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs PONY's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)OUST logoOUST+104.3% vs MBLY's -41.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs INVZ's -57.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs -46.9%

PONY vs OUST vs KO vs MBLY vs INVZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Autonomous Vehicle Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Autonomous Vehicle Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
PONYPony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares
FY 2025
Product
66.8%$33M
Engineering Solution Services
33.2%$17M
OUSTOuster, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$111M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
MBLYMobileye Global Inc.
FY 2025
Mobileye
97.9%$1.9B
Other Operating Segment
2.1%$39M
INVZInnoviz Technologies Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

PONY vs OUST vs KO vs MBLY vs INVZ — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGINVZ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 1099.3x INVZ's $45M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MBLY's -2.0%. On growth, OUST holds the edge at +48.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPONY logoPONYPony AI Inc. Amer…OUST logoOUSTOuster, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…MBLY logoMBLYMobileye Global I…INVZ logoINVZInnoviz Technolog…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$90M$185M$49.3B$2.0B$45M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$256M-$60M$15.5B-$3.8B-$74M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$134M-$56M$13.7B-$4.1B-$81M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$209M-$69M$12.6B$482M-$47M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+15.7%+49.0%+61.7%+48.3%+9.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.9%-37.4%+29.3%-2.1%-178.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-148.5%-30.1%+27.8%-2.0%-181.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.3%-37.4%+25.5%+23.9%-105.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+16.3%+48.9%+12.1%+27.4%-59.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+110.8%+33.3%+18.2%-35.0%-76.2%
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — KO and MBLY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, KO's 26.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MBLY's 74.9x.

MetricPONY logoPONYPony AI Inc. Amer…OUST logoOUSTOuster, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…MBLY logoMBLYMobileye Global I…INVZ logoINVZInnoviz Technolog…
Market CapShares × price$2.9B$2.5B$355.6B$7.6B$137M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.6B$2.5B$390.8B$5.8B$193M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-23.29x-37.20x27.18x-19.46x-1.82x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.27x33.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.39x74.94x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue31.83x14.96x7.42x4.02x2.48x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.81x8.57x10.40x0.64x1.59x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.15x14.54x
Evenly matched — KO and MBLY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-102 for INVZ. PONY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs PONY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPONY logoPONYPony AI Inc. Amer…OUST logoOUSTOuster, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…MBLY logoMBLYMobileye Global I…INVZ logoINVZInnoviz Technolog…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-12.4%-22.2%+41.1%-37.3%-101.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-11.4%-15.9%+13.1%-35.5%-57.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-20.9%-30.2%+15.8%-3.2%-46.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-19.4%-31.1%+17.3%-3.6%-64.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946755
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.07x1.33x0.83x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$280M-$50M$35.2B-$1.8B$56M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$295M$67M$10.3B$1.8B$9M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$15M$17M$45.5B$0$65M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense10.70x-46.35x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

OUST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $621 for INVZ. Over the past 12 months, OUST leads with a +104.3% total return vs MBLY's -41.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OUST at 89.8% vs INVZ's -39.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPONY logoPONYPony AI Inc. Amer…OUST logoOUSTOuster, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…MBLY logoMBLYMobileye Global I…INVZ logoINVZInnoviz Technolog…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-49.3%+70.3%+20.3%-16.8%-35.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-35.8%+104.3%+17.2%-41.2%-35.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-32.1%+583.8%+47.0%-76.6%-78.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-32.1%-64.9%+65.6%-67.8%-93.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-32.1%-59.0%+121.1%-67.8%-93.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-12.1%+89.8%+13.7%-38.4%-39.9%
OUST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OUST's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs INVZ's 24.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPONY logoPONYPony AI Inc. Amer…OUST logoOUSTOuster, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…MBLY logoMBLYMobileye Global I…INVZ logoINVZInnoviz Technolog…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5003.32x3.93x-0.20x2.09x2.47x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$24.92$49.39$84.04$20.18$2.54
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.95$16.40$65.35$6.47$0.58
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+32.7%+80.6%+98.3%+46.3%+24.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.654.660.649.041.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.3M4.0M12.7M6.0M2.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PONY as "Buy", OUST as "Hold", KO as "Buy", MBLY as "Buy", INVZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 871.7% upside for INVZ (target: $6) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs PONY's 0.21%.

MetricPONY logoPONYPony AI Inc. Amer…OUST logoOUSTOuster, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…MBLY logoMBLYMobileye Global I…INVZ logoINVZInnoviz Technolog…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$23.00$56.00$86.13$13.32$6.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2948265
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0561
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.02$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.2%+1.3%0.0%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OUST leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PONY vs OUST vs KO vs MBLY vs INVZ: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PONY or OUST or KO or MBLY or INVZ a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Innoviz Technologies Ltd.

(INVZ) is the stronger pick with 127. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PONY or OUST or KO or MBLY or INVZ?

On forward P/E, The Coca-Cola Company is actually cheaper at 25.

3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PONY or OUST or KO or MBLY or INVZ?

Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.

6%, compared to -93. 8% for Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus INVZ's -93. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PONY or OUST or KO or MBLY or INVZ?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Ouster, Inc. 's 3. 93β — meaning OUST is approximately -2061% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PONY or OUST or KO or MBLY or INVZ?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Innoviz Technologies Ltd.

(INVZ) is pulling ahead at 127. 0% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mobileye Global Inc. grew EPS 87. 4% year-over-year, compared to 23. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, INVZ leads at 109. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PONY or OUST or KO or MBLY or INVZ?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -148. 9% for Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -289. 8% for PONY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PONY or OUST or KO or MBLY or INVZ more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) trades at 25.

3x forward P/E versus 33. 7x for Mobileye Global Inc. — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INVZ: 871. 7% to $6. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PONY or OUST or KO or MBLY or INVZ?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield), PONY (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. OUST, MBLY, INVZ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PONY or OUST or KO or MBLY or INVZ better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ) carries a higher beta of 2. 47 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, INVZ: -93. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PONY and OUST and KO and MBLY and INVZ?

These companies operate in different sectors (PONY (Industrials) and OUST (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and MBLY (Consumer Cyclical) and INVZ (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PONY is a small-cap high-growth stock; OUST is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MBLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INVZ is a small-cap high-growth stock. KO pays a dividend while PONY, OUST, MBLY, INVZ do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.