Industrial - Distribution
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
POOL vs SITE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Distribution
POOL vs SITE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $6.86B | $5.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.36B | $4.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $406M | $153M |
| Gross Margin | 29.7% | 34.9% |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | 16.9x | 27.8x |
| Total Debt | $349M | $980M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $105M | $191M |
POOL vs SITE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pool Corporation (POOL) | 100 | 69.5 | -30.5% |
| SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE) | 100 | 113.9 | +13.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: POOL vs SITE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
POOL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 29.4%, current ratio 2.24x
- PEG 4.36 vs SITE's 6.69
SITE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
- 353.9% 10Y total return vs POOL's 149.0%
- 3.6% revenue growth vs POOL's -0.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs POOL's -0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.9x vs 27.8x), PEG 4.36 vs 6.69 | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.6% margin vs SITE's 3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs SITE's 1.24, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +0.2% vs POOL's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.3% ROA vs SITE's 4.6%, ROIC 22.3% vs 7.3% |
POOL vs SITE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
POOL vs SITE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
POOL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
POOL and SITE operate at a comparable scale, with $5.4B and $4.7B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.6% (POOL) to 3.2% (SITE). On growth, POOL holds the edge at +6.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.4B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $636M | $382M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $406M | $153M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $605M | $246M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +34.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +5.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.2% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +1.6% |
Valuation Metrics
POOL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.2x trailing earnings, POOL trades at a 52% valuation discount to SITE's 35.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), POOL offers better value at 4.44x vs SITE's 8.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.9B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.1B | $6.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.24x | 35.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.90x | 27.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.44x | 8.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.25x | 16.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.30x | 1.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.88x | 3.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.18x | 21.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
POOL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
POOL delivers a 32.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $9 for SITE. POOL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SITE's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITE scores 8/9 vs POOL's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.2% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.3% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.3% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.0% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $244M | $789M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $105M | $191M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $349M | $980M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.20x | 6.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SITE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SITE five years ago would be worth $6,256 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,721 for POOL. Over the past 12 months, SITE leads with a +0.2% total return vs POOL's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SITE at -7.5% vs POOL's -17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.0% | -3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.3% | +0.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.1% | -20.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.8% | -37.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.0% | +353.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.2% | -7.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — POOL and SITE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
POOL is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SITE's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SITE currently trades 71.8% from its 52-week high vs POOL's 54.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $345.00 | $168.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $186.95 | $112.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.2% | +71.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.2 | 38.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 749K | 686K |
Analyst Outlook
POOL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates POOL as "Buy" and SITE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.3% upside for POOL (target: $279) vs 34.1% for SITE (target: $162). POOL is the only dividend payer here at 2.65% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $279.29 | $162.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.96 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.0% | +1.8% |
POOL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SITE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
POOL vs SITE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is POOL or SITE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 4% for Pool Corporation (POOL). Pool Corporation (POOL) offers the better valuation at 17. 2x trailing P/E (16. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pool Corporation (POOL) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — POOL or SITE?
On trailing P/E, Pool Corporation (POOL) is the cheapest at 17.
2x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. at 35. 9x. On forward P/E, Pool Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Pool Corporation wins at 4. 36x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 69x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — POOL or SITE?
Over the past 5 years, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) delivered a total return of -37. 4%, compared to -52. 8% for Pool Corporation (POOL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SITE returned +353. 9% versus POOL's +149. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — POOL or SITE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pool Corporation (POOL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
00β versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 1. 24β — meaning SITE is approximately 24% more volatile than POOL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pool Corporation (POOL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 58% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — POOL or SITE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -0. 4% for Pool Corporation (POOL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. grew EPS 24. 4% year-over-year, compared to -4. 0% for Pool Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SITE leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — POOL or SITE?
Pool Corporation (POOL) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
7% net margin versus 3. 2% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: POOL leads at 11. 0% versus 5. 1% for SITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SITE leads at 34. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is POOL or SITE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Pool Corporation (POOL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 4. 36x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 69x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Pool Corporation (POOL) trades at 16. 9x forward P/E versus 27. 8x for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — 10. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POOL: 49. 3% to $279. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — POOL or SITE?
In this comparison, POOL (2.
7% yield) pays a dividend. SITE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is POOL or SITE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pool Corporation (POOL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
00), 2. 7% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (POOL: +149. 0%, SITE: +353. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between POOL and SITE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: POOL is a small-cap deep-value stock; SITE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. POOL pays a dividend while SITE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.