Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD vs SLAB vs ON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD vs SLAB vs ON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $4.00B | $77.41B | $5.18B | $7.17B | $39.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $446M | $2.79B | $1.56B | $785M | $6.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $17M | $616M | $86M | $-65M | $574M |
| Gross Margin | 53.9% | 55.2% | 31.3% | 58.2% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | 26.1% | 3.5% | -9.0% | 10.8% |
| Forward P/E | 55.5x | 73.1x | 48.5x | 80.4x | 34.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $24M | $96M | $0.00 | $3.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $59M | $1.10B | $367M | $364M | $2.15B |
POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD vs SLAB vs ON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 751.4 | +651.4% |
| Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) | 100 | 231.5 | +131.5% |
| Silicon Laboratorie… (SLAB) | 100 | 232.4 | +132.4% |
| ON Semiconductor Co… (ON) | 100 | 610.0 | +510.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD vs SLAB vs ON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
POWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 2.08, yield 1.2%
- Beta 2.08, yield 1.2%, current ratio 6.51x
- 1.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
MPWR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 24.9% 10Y total return vs ON's 10.0%
- 22.1% margin vs SLAB's -8.3%
- 15.2% ROA vs SLAB's -5.1%, ROIC 22.2% vs -6.9%
DIOD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +187.1% vs POWI's +44.4%
SLAB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 34.3%, EPS growth 66.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.25, current ratio 4.69x
- 34.3% revenue growth vs ON's -15.3%
- Beta 1.25 vs MPWR's 2.28
ON is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (34.4x vs 80.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.3% revenue growth vs ON's -15.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (34.4x vs 80.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs SLAB's -8.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.25 vs MPWR's 2.28 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +187.1% vs POWI's +44.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs SLAB's -5.1%, ROIC 22.2% vs -6.9% |
POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD vs SLAB vs ON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD vs SLAB vs ON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MPWR leads in 2 of 6 categories
DIOD leads 1 • SLAB leads 1 • POWI leads 1 • ON leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MPWR and SLAB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ON is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 13.6x POWI's $446M. MPWR is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLAB's -8.3%. On growth, SLAB holds the edge at +25.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $446M | $2.8B | $1.6B | $785M | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $41M | $781M | $162M | -$32M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $17M | $616M | $86M | -$65M | $574M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $85M | $664M | $129M | $66M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.9% | +55.2% | +31.3% | +58.2% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +26.1% | +3.5% | -9.0% | +10.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +22.1% | +5.5% | -8.3% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +23.8% | +8.3% | +8.4% | +24.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +20.8% | +22.1% | +25.2% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -60.0% | -88.4% | +4.3% | +88.8% | +93.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DIOD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 78.7x trailing earnings, DIOD trades at a 77% valuation discount to ON's 346.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DIOD's 27.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPWR's 97.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $77.4B | $5.2B | $7.2B | $39.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.9B | $76.3B | $4.9B | $6.8B | $40.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 184.18x | 123.60x | 78.73x | -109.92x | 346.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 55.51x | 73.12x | 48.48x | 80.41x | 34.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.19x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 79.69x | 97.90x | 27.39x | — | 28.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.02x | 27.74x | 3.50x | 9.14x | 6.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.01x | 21.56x | 2.70x | 6.51x | 5.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 45.93x | 116.20x | 37.77x | 109.03x | 27.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-6 for SLAB. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ON's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), POWI scores 6/9 vs ON's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | +17.9% | +4.4% | -5.9% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +15.2% | +3.5% | -5.1% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +22.2% | +1.6% | -6.9% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +20.4% | +1.7% | -6.3% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x | 0.05x | — | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$59M | -$1.1B | -$272M | -$364M | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $59M | $1.1B | $367M | $364M | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $24M | $96M | $0 | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 54.72x | -58.63x | 10.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $46,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,165 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, DIOD leads with a +187.1% total return vs POWI's +44.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPWR at 56.1% vs POWI's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +93.2% | +68.5% | +118.9% | +65.0% | +77.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.4% | +148.6% | +187.1% | +100.3% | +159.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.3% | +280.3% | +33.6% | +59.0% | +24.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.3% | +366.2% | +51.0% | +61.0% | +160.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +232.7% | +2494.7% | +490.7% | +375.0% | +1004.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.2% | +56.1% | +10.1% | +16.7% | +7.7% |
Risk & Volatility
SLAB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLAB is the less volatile stock with a 1.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MPWR's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLAB currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs POWI's 91.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.08x | 2.28x | 2.11x | 1.25x | 1.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $78.94 | $1662.00 | $117.80 | $218.66 | $105.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.86 | $613.00 | $37.97 | $106.01 | $37.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.0% | +94.8% | +95.6% | +99.5% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.1 | 71.0 | 80.4 | 66.1 | 81.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 967K | 577K | 533K | 465K | 9.2M |
Analyst Outlook
POWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: POWI as "Buy", MPWR as "Buy", DIOD as "Buy", SLAB as "Buy", ON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -38.0% for ON (target: $62). For income investors, POWI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.17% vs MPWR's 0.37%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $79.00 | $1615.00 | $74.00 | $211.60 | $62.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 25 | 13 | 37 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +0.4% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 18 | 8 | 1 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | $5.90 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +0.0% | +0.7% | 0.0% | +3.5% |
MPWR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). DIOD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD vs SLAB vs ON: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is POWI or MPWR or DIOD or SLAB or ON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the stronger pick with 34. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) offers the better valuation at 78. 7x trailing P/E (48. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — POWI or MPWR or DIOD or SLAB or ON?
On trailing P/E, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) is the cheapest at 78.
7x versus ON Semiconductor Corporation at 346. 8x. On forward P/E, ON Semiconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 34. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — POWI or MPWR or DIOD or SLAB or ON?
Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) delivered a total return of +366. 2%, compared to -8. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPWR returned +24. 9% versus POWI's +232. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — POWI or MPWR or DIOD or SLAB or ON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 25β versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 28β — meaning MPWR is approximately 82% more volatile than SLAB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 45% for ON Semiconductor Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — POWI or MPWR or DIOD or SLAB or ON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is pulling ahead at 34. 3% versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Silicon Laboratories Inc. grew EPS 66. 6% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for ON Semiconductor Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — POWI or MPWR or DIOD or SLAB or ON?
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -8. 3% for Silicon Laboratories Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPWR leads at 26. 1% versus -9. 0% for SLAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLAB leads at 58. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is POWI or MPWR or DIOD or SLAB or ON more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) trades at 34.
4x forward P/E versus 80. 4x for Silicon Laboratories Inc. — 46. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 10. 0% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — POWI or MPWR or DIOD or SLAB or ON?
In this comparison, POWI (1.
2% yield), MPWR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. DIOD, SLAB, ON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is POWI or MPWR or DIOD or SLAB or ON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 25), +375. 0% 10Y return). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLAB: +375. 0%, MPWR: +24. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between POWI and MPWR and DIOD and SLAB and ON?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DIOD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLAB is a small-cap high-growth stock; ON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. POWI pays a dividend while MPWR, DIOD, SLAB, ON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.