Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD vs TXN vs ON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD vs TXN vs ON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $4.08B | $78.63B | $5.13B | $262.15B | $40.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $446M | $2.79B | $1.56B | $18.44B | $6.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $17M | $616M | $86M | $5.37B | $574M |
| Gross Margin | 53.9% | 55.2% | 31.3% | 57.3% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | 26.1% | 3.5% | 35.3% | 10.8% |
| Forward P/E | 58.7x | 67.2x | 42.6x | 38.1x | 33.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $24M | $96M | $15.39B | $3.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $59M | $1.10B | $367M | $3.23B | $2.15B |
POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD vs TXN vs ON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 135.3 | +35.3% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 763.2 | +663.2% |
| Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) | 100 | 229.1 | +129.1% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | 100 | 242.5 | +142.5% |
| ON Semiconductor Co… (ON) | 100 | 625.8 | +525.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD vs TXN vs ON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, POWI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MPWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 26.4%, EPS growth -65.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.9%
- 25.3% 10Y total return vs ON's 10.3%
- 26.4% revenue growth vs ON's -15.3%
DIOD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +179.0% vs POWI's +43.3%
TXN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 1.9%
- Beta 1.09, yield 1.9%, current ratio 4.35x
- 29.1% margin vs POWI's 3.7%
- Beta 1.09 vs MPWR's 2.27
ON is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.91, Low D/E 45.1%, current ratio 4.52x
- Lower P/E (33.7x vs 38.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.4% revenue growth vs ON's -15.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (33.7x vs 38.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.1% margin vs POWI's 3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs MPWR's 2.27 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +179.0% vs POWI's +43.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.5% ROA vs POWI's 2.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.4% |
POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD vs TXN vs ON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD vs TXN vs ON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TXN leads in 3 of 6 categories
MPWR leads 2 • DIOD leads 1 • POWI leads 0 • ON leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 41.3x POWI's $446M. TXN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to POWI's 3.7%. On growth, DIOD holds the edge at +22.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $446M | $2.8B | $1.6B | $18.4B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $41M | $781M | $162M | $8.1B | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $17M | $616M | $86M | $5.4B | $574M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $85M | $664M | $129M | $3.7B | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.9% | +55.2% | +31.3% | +57.3% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +26.1% | +3.5% | +35.3% | +10.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +22.1% | +5.5% | +29.1% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +23.8% | +8.3% | +20.2% | +24.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +20.8% | +22.1% | +18.6% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -60.0% | -88.4% | +4.3% | +32.0% | +93.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DIOD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 52.8x trailing earnings, TXN trades at a 85% valuation discount to ON's 355.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DIOD's 27.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPWR's 99.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $78.6B | $5.1B | $262.1B | $40.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $77.6B | $4.9B | $274.3B | $41.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 187.90x | 125.56x | 77.91x | 52.83x | 355.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 58.74x | 67.24x | 42.65x | 38.12x | 33.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.26x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 81.32x | 99.47x | 27.09x | 34.20x | 29.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.20x | 28.18x | 3.46x | 14.83x | 6.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.13x | 21.90x | 2.67x | 16.15x | 5.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 46.85x | 118.03x | 37.37x | 100.71x | 28.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN delivers a 32.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $2 for POWI. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXN's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TXN scores 7/9 vs ON's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | +17.9% | +4.4% | +32.5% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +15.2% | +3.5% | +15.5% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +22.2% | +1.6% | +15.8% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +20.4% | +1.7% | +19.0% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x | 0.05x | 0.95x | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$59M | -$1.1B | -$272M | $12.2B | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $59M | $1.1B | $367M | $3.2B | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $24M | $96M | $15.4B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 66.87x | 12.06x | 10.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $50,422 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,871 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, DIOD leads with a +179.0% total return vs POWI's +43.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPWR at 56.9% vs POWI's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +97.0% | +71.2% | +116.6% | +63.8% | +82.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.3% | +151.2% | +179.0% | +77.2% | +159.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.5% | +286.3% | +32.2% | +85.2% | +28.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.3% | +404.2% | +57.4% | +72.2% | +178.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +239.0% | +2534.9% | +484.5% | +476.4% | +1032.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.5% | +56.9% | +9.7% | +22.8% | +8.6% |
Risk & Volatility
TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXN is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MPWR's 2.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TXN currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs POWI's 89.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.11x | 2.27x | 2.08x | 1.09x | 1.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $81.59 | $1662.00 | $117.80 | $292.64 | $105.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.86 | $630.00 | $39.23 | $152.73 | $38.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.8% | +96.3% | +94.6% | +98.4% | +97.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.3 | 61.6 | 73.3 | 75.2 | 69.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 982K | 578K | 546K | 6.7M | 9.3M |
Analyst Outlook
TXN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: POWI as "Buy", MPWR as "Buy", DIOD as "Buy", TXN as "Buy", ON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -11.9% for TXN (target: $254). For income investors, TXN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.90% vs MPWR's 0.37%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $79.00 | $1615.00 | $120.00 | $253.71 | $94.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 25 | 13 | 65 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +0.4% | — | +1.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 18 | 8 | 1 | 22 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | $5.90 | — | $5.48 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +0.0% | +0.7% | +0.6% | +3.4% |
TXN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). MPWR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD vs TXN vs ON: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is POWI or MPWR or DIOD or TXN or ON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the stronger pick with 26. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) offers the better valuation at 52. 8x trailing P/E (38. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — POWI or MPWR or DIOD or TXN or ON?
On trailing P/E, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the cheapest at 52.
8x versus ON Semiconductor Corporation at 355. 9x. On forward P/E, ON Semiconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 33. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — POWI or MPWR or DIOD or TXN or ON?
Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) delivered a total return of +404. 2%, compared to -1. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPWR returned +25. 3% versus POWI's +239. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — POWI or MPWR or DIOD or TXN or ON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
09β versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 27β — meaning MPWR is approximately 108% more volatile than TXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 95% for Texas Instruments Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — POWI or MPWR or DIOD or TXN or ON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is pulling ahead at 26. 4% versus -15. 3% for ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Diodes Incorporated grew EPS 50. 5% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for ON Semiconductor Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — POWI or MPWR or DIOD or TXN or ON?
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the more profitable company, earning 28.
3% net margin versus 2. 0% for ON Semiconductor Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TXN leads at 34. 1% versus 2. 4% for DIOD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TXN leads at 57. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is POWI or MPWR or DIOD or TXN or ON more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) trades at 33.
7x forward P/E versus 67. 2x for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. — 33. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 7. 8% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — POWI or MPWR or DIOD or TXN or ON?
In this comparison, TXN (1.
9% yield), POWI (1. 1% yield), MPWR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. DIOD, ON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is POWI or MPWR or DIOD or TXN or ON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
09), 1. 9% yield, +476. 4% 10Y return). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXN: +476. 4%, MPWR: +25. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between POWI and MPWR and DIOD and TXN and ON?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DIOD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TXN is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. POWI, TXN pay a dividend while MPWR, DIOD, ON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.