Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
POWR vs AEP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
POWR vs AEP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $619M | $71.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $444M | $22.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $3.65B |
| Gross Margin | 22.8% | 40.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 23.5% |
| Forward P/E | 105.5x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $50.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $268M |
Quick Verdict: POWR vs AEP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
POWR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 72.9%, EPS growth 183.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 11.2%, current ratio 1.51x
- 72.9% NII/revenue growth vs AEP's 9.4%
AEP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 2.9%
- 146.9% 10Y total return vs POWR's 45.4%
- PEG 2.43 vs POWR's 2.70
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 72.9% NII/revenue growth vs AEP's 9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.8x vs 105.5x), PEG 2.43 vs 2.70 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.5% margin vs POWR's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs POWR's 0.82 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield; 21-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.1% vs POWR's +16.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs POWR's -1.4%, ROIC 5.1% vs 4.6% |
POWR vs AEP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
POWR vs AEP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEP leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEP is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.2B annually — 50.0x POWR's $444M. AEP is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to POWR's 1.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $444M | $22.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | $8.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $3.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$41M | $840M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +40.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +23.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +16.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +6.7% |
Valuation Metrics
AEP leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.8x trailing earnings, AEP trades at a 81% valuation discount to POWR's 105.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AEP offers better value at 2.32x vs POWR's 2.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $619M | $71.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $620M | $121.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 105.54x | 19.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.70x | 2.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.74x | 13.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.40x | 3.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.74x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AEP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AEP delivers a 11.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-3 for POWR. POWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEP's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AEP scores 7/9 vs POWR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +11.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.4% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $170,000 | $50.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $268M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $50.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.54x | 2.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AEP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEP five years ago would be worth $17,068 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,181 for POWR. Over the past 12 months, AEP leads with a +26.1% total return vs POWR's +16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEP at 15.7% vs POWR's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.8% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.4% | +26.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.4% | +54.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.8% | +70.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.4% | +146.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.5% | +15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — POWR and AEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AEP is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than POWR's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.42 | $139.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.18 | $97.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.7 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 124K | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
AEP is the only dividend payer here at 2.93% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $136.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
AEP leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
POWR vs AEP: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is POWR or AEP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, iShares Inc.
(POWR) is the stronger pick with 72. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 4% for American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP). American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP) offers the better valuation at 19. 8x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — POWR or AEP?
On trailing P/E, American Electric Power Company, Inc.
(AEP) is the cheapest at 19. 8x versus iShares Inc. at 105. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — POWR or AEP?
Over the past 5 years, American Electric Power Company, Inc.
(AEP) delivered a total return of +70. 7%, compared to +31. 8% for iShares Inc. (POWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEP returned +146. 9% versus POWR's +45. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — POWR or AEP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Electric Power Company, Inc.
(AEP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus iShares Inc. 's 0. 82β — meaning POWR is approximately 12658% more volatile than AEP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, iShares Inc. (POWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 156% for American Electric Power Company, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — POWR or AEP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), iShares Inc.
(POWR) is pulling ahead at 72. 9% versus 9. 4% for American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: iShares Inc. grew EPS 183. 9% year-over-year, compared to 19. 4% for American Electric Power Company, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — POWR or AEP?
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
(AEP) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus 1. 3% for iShares Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEP leads at 24. 3% versus 2. 5% for POWR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEP leads at 31. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — POWR or AEP?
In this comparison, AEP (2.
9% yield) pays a dividend. POWR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is POWR or AEP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Electric Power Company, Inc.
(AEP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 2. 9% yield, +146. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AEP: +146. 9%, POWR: +45. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between POWR and AEP?
These companies operate in different sectors (POWR (Financial Services) and AEP (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: POWR is a small-cap high-growth stock; AEP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. AEP pays a dividend while POWR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.