Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PPC vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
PPC vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $7.45B | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.57B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $888M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 11.6% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 8.1x | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $3.35B | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $640M | $10.73B |
PPC vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pilgrim's Pride Cor… (PPC) | 100 | 147.1 | +47.1% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PPC vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PPC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.02, yield 26.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 90.8%, current ratio 1.47x
- PEG 0.13 vs WMT's 4.06
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs PPC's 71.4%
- 4.7% revenue growth vs PPC's 3.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs PPC's 3.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 44.7x), PEG 0.13 vs 4.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs WMT's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs WMT's 0.12 | |
| Dividends | 26.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.0% vs PPC's -28.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.7% ROA vs WMT's 7.9%, ROIC 20.0% vs 14.7% |
PPC vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PPC vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PPC and WMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 37.9x PPC's $18.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.8% (PPC) to 3.3% (WMT). On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.6B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.8B | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $888M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $773M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.3% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PPC leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, PPC trades at a 86% valuation discount to WMT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PPC offers better value at 0.11x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.4B | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.2B | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.89x | 47.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.05x | 44.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.11x | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.91x | 24.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.40x | 1.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.02x | 10.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.27x | 24.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PPC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PPC delivers a 24.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $22 for WMT. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PPC's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs PPC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.1% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.7% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.0% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.8% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.91x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.7B | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $640M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.4B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.87x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,569 for PPC. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +33.0% total return vs PPC's -28.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.5% vs PPC's 20.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.5% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.4% | +33.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.0% | +160.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.7% | +185.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.4% | +505.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.5% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PPC and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PPC is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WMT's 0.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs PPC's 60.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.02x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $51.45 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.22 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.8% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.9 | 58.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PPC and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PPC as "Hold" and WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.0% upside for PPC (target: $46) vs 5.4% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, PPC offers the higher dividend yield at 26.72% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.00 | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +26.7% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $8.36 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
PPC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WMT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
PPC vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PPC or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 5% for Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC). Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PPC or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the cheapest at 6.
9x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Pilgrim's Pride Corporation wins at 0. 13x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PPC or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +185. 3%, compared to +65. 7% for Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus PPC's +52. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PPC or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
02β versus Walmart Inc. 's 0. 12β — meaning WMT is approximately 379% more volatile than PPC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 91% for Pilgrim's Pride Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PPC or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 3. 5% for Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -0. 7% for Pilgrim's Pride Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PPC or WMT?
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
9% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PPC leads at 8. 7% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMT leads at 24. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PPC or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 13x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 36. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PPC: 47. 0% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PPC or WMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) offers the highest yield at 26. 7%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is PPC or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, PPC: +52. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PPC and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PPC is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.